Statistica Training Course

Example Graphs and Analyses

From Statistica
• Statistica Graphs Are Fully Editable
• Examples Provided Here Should Open In
Statistica. Provides and Example of How
They Were Created
QA/QC Analyses
 Relative Difference in Pulp Assay Grades
0.6
Total Copper Reative Difference (Yr 2002 - Previous)
0.5
Relative Difference For Duplicate Pair
10 Point Moving Average of Difference
0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1

0.0

-0.1

-0.2

-0.3

-0.4

-0.5

-0.6
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5
Average Total Copper Grade of Duplicate Pair
 Example Relative Difference By Sequence, Arsenic (ppm)
180 3000
Average Grade of Pair
Relative Difference
160 Rel Diff > 35% and Grade>50 ppm
2500
140

120 Poor Precision 2000

Cluster

100
1500
80

60 1000
Relative Difference (%)

Average Grade of Pair (ppm)

40
500
20

0 0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
Sequence Number
 Comparison of Results and Standards for Ag ppm by ICP
70

60

50

40

30
Ag (ppm) ICP

20
SG902-7
SG900-3
10 SG301-6
SG902-5
SG300-5C
0
SG399-6
SG399-5
SG996-3
3-Aug-05

8-Aug-05

9-Aug-05

5-Sep-05
13-Jul-05

13-Jul-05

18-Jul-05

21-Jul-05

SG398-1
16-Aug-05

18-Aug-05

23-Aug-05

13-Sep-05

29-Sep-05

29-Sep-05
Return Date
 Bismuth, ICP41 Standards, Box Plot
50

45

40 Average
Median
25%-75%
35 Non-Outlier Range
Outliers
Extremes
30

25 Y=
1.2
0*
20 X-
1 .3
3
15
Laboratory Quantifications (pp

10

0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36
Best Value (ppm)
Contact Analysis
 Contact With Rock Type 100
1.5

Contact
1.4
With Unit
300
1.3 350
500
1.2 700

1.1

1.0

0.9

0.8
Average Copper (%)

0.7

0.6

0.5 Average Copper Average Copper Within

Adjoining Unit Unit 100
0.4
-100 -80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 100
Distance From Contact (m)
 Contact With Rock Type 350
1.3

1.2

1.1 Contact
With Unit
1.0 100
300
500
0.9 600
700
0.8

0.7

0.6
Average Copper (%)

0.5

0.4

0.3 Average Copper Average Copper Within

Adjoining Unit Unit 350
0.2
-100 -80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 100
Distance From Contact (m)
 Composite Averages By 45x45x48m Block, Min. 3 Composites
400 4 4 4 4 4
350 CUT DH100
300 3 3 3 3 3
250
200 2 2 2 2 2
150
100 1 1 1 1 1
50
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4

4 3500 4 4 4 4
3000 CUT DH300
3 2500 3 3 3 3
2000
2 2 2 2 2
1500
1 1000 1 1 1 1
500
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4

4 4 4 4 4
500 CUT DH350
3 3 3 3 3
400
2 2 300 2 2 2
200
1 1 1 1 1
100
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4

4 4 4 4 4
1000 CUT DH500
3 3 3 800 3 3

2 2 2 600 2 2
400
1 1 1 1 1
200
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4

4 4 4 4 4
400 CUT DH600
3 3 3 3 350 3
300
250
2 2 2 2 200 2
150
1 1 1 1 100 1
50
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4

4 4 4 4 4 700
600 CUT DH700
3 3 3 3 3 500
400
2 2 2 2 2
300
1 1 1 1 1 200
100
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4
Plots of Grade Against Difference
Controlling Variables
 Average Copper (%)

0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3736 3.0
3796
3856
3916
3976
4036
4096
4156
4216

Intrusive
4276
4336
4396
4456
4516

3736
3796
3856
3916
3976
4036
4096
4156
4216

EndoSkarn
4276
7.5m Composite

4336
4396
4456
3m + 7.5m Composites

4516

3736
3796
3856
1

50
20
Unit

3916
3976
4036
4096
2.10
1.17
0.26

4156
Breccia

4216
Average Copper By Bench and Composite Type

4276
4336
2.31
1.15
0.24
Averages (%)

4396
4456
7.5m 3m+7.5m

4516
 Average Zinc By Lithology Group and Grade Zone
4.5

4.0
Model Average
Nearest Neighbor
3.5 Data Average

3.0
Average Zinc (%)

2.5

2.0

1.5

1.0

0.5

0.0
LMS/Hrnf el Int/Endo/Brx Exoskarn LMS/Hrnf el Int/Endo/Brx Exoskarn LMS/Hrnf el Int/Endo/Brx Exoskarn

Low Grade Zone Medium Grade High Grade

 Average Zinc (%)

0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
60 to 110m 1.2
110 to 160m

160 to 210m

Azm = 330
>210m

60 to 110m

110 to 160m

160 to 210m

Azm = 30
>210m

60 to 110m

110 to 160m

160 to 210m

Azm = 90
>210m

60 to 110m

110 to 160m

160 to 210m

Azm = 150
>210m

60 to 110m

110 to 160m

160 to 210m
Azm = 210

>210m
Data Avg.
NN Model
Kriged Model

60 to 110m

110 to 160m
Zinc in Endo/Brx/Int By Distance From Lms and Azm

160 to 210m
Azm = 270

>210m
Customized Line Plots
 Oxide Indicator Variogram
0.30
0.28
0.26
0.24
0.22
0.20
0.18
0.16
(h)

0.14
NS
0.12
N45E
0.10 EW
N45W
0.08 Vertical
0.06
0.04
(h) = 0.04 + 0.094 Sph85,36,24(h135,h45,hv) + 0.10 Sph223,91,139(h135,h45,hv)
0.02
0.00
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220
Distance
Scatterplots
 Multiple Search (TRIS) vs. Blast Blocks, Don Luis
3.0

2.5 798 Blocks (30x30x16m)

Average Difference = -0.02%
Var. of Difference = 0.030%2
r = 0.84

2.0

1.5

Y = 0.13 + 0.85 * X
1.0
Blast Block Grades

0.5

0.0
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0
Estimated Block Grade - Multiple Search (TRIS)
Combination Bar-Line Plots
 Complete Resource for xxxxx (Insitu and Broken Material)
 1.4
 1.3
  1.2
  1.1
 1.0

0.9
 
0.8
 
Sulf.Prim. 0.7
 Sulf.Sec.
Mixed 0.6

Million Tons

Oxide
Leached 0.5

Total Copper (%)

  CuT(%) Lix
CuT(%) Ox 0.4
  CuT(%) Mx
  CuT(%) SS 0.3
CuT(%) SP
  0.2

 0.1

 0.0
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
Total Copper cutoff (%)