Professional Documents
Culture Documents
E-Tailing: Principles of Internet Marketing MARK 468
E-Tailing: Principles of Internet Marketing MARK 468
1
Session Format
Statistics
E-tailing Model
Economic Issues
Conclusion
2
Statistics
Household with PC: 53%
Households connected to internet: 34%
Households buying items online: 17%
Percent of total dollars spent online: 15%
Average U.S. online shopper spent $1205
Percent of total dollars spent online projected
in 2002: 36%
Reference: Ernst & Young Online Global Retailing
http://www.ey.com
3
Statistics (Cont.)
# of purchases made : 13
# of sites purchased from: 11
% of shoppers who have purchased through
auction site: 51%
% of purchases made online which would not
have been made elsewhere: 43%
% of online purchases made unplanned: 16%
Reference: Ernst & Young Online Global Retailing
http://www.ey.com
4
Statistics (Cont.)
% of online shopping trips resulting in
online purchase: 51%
% of online shopping trips resulting in
store purchase: 25%
5
Statistics (Cont.)
1999 online e-tailing revenues totaled $33.1
billion, or 1.4% of overall retail revenue
Expected to grow 85% to $61.1 billion in
2000
In 1999, online, offline demographics became
more similar
Three strongest categories remain travel,
computer hardware and software, and
brokerage services
Reference: Ernst & Young Online Global Retailing
http://www.ey.com
6
Statistics (Cont.)
50 largest online retailers command 67% of
the market
However, the top ten sites declined from 43%
in 1998 to 38% in 1999
Nontraditional business models such as
auctions, buying groups, and manufacturers
and distributors selling directly to the
consumer, accounted for more than 35% of
1999 online product revenue
Reference: Ernst & Young Online Global Retailing
http://www.ey.com
7
Statistics (Cont.)
Customer acquisition costs increased by 15%
in 1999 to $38 per customer from $33 in
1998
This increase driven by pure-play retailers,
whose acquisition cost per customer jumped
to $82, while multichannel acquisition cost
decreased to $12
Order conversion rate increased from 2.8% in
1998 to 3.2% in 1999
Reference: Ernst & Young Online Global Retailing
http://www.ey.com 8
Statistics (Cont.)
Pure-play marketing spend as a percentage of
total revenues was ten times that of
multichannel retailers
Pure plays shifted emphasis away from
generating awareness into retention
Multichannel retailers increased focus on
brand awareness
Order fulfillment process ripe for
improvement – catalog based players do best
Reference: Ernst & Young Online Global Retailing
http://www.ey.com
9
Statistics (Cont.)
88% of online consumers abandoned
carts during last Christmas shopping
season
62% of retail sites failed to turn profit
10
E-tailing Model
E-tailing model is a direct sales model using
the internet as one or more channels of
distribution
Distinguished from content or service
advertising revenue model
Usually not associated with transactions,
auctions, or exchanges in either B2C or B2B
market
Pioneered by Amazon.com
11
E-tailing Model (Cont.)
Successful e-tail model requires same market
analysis as offline models including
assessment of:
Market size
Market segments
Market needs
Competitors & Positioning
Unique Selling Propositions
Communication Strategy, Given
Analysis of Buyer Behavior and
How Choices Are Made
12
E-tailing Model (Cont.)
Online, consumers have a variety of
tools to facilitate choice, including:
Product evaluation sites
Store evaluation sites
Price evaluation sites
Coupons, incentive, reward sites
13
E-tailing Model (Cont.)
E-tailing also characterized by unique
buying “motivators” and “inhibitors”:
Prime buying motivators:
Saving money
More convenience
More choice
More fun than traditional shopping
14
E-tailing Model (Cont.)
15
E-tailing Model (Cont.)
E-tailers should address inhibitors directly:
Increase trust and privacy protection through
policies, 3rd party affiliation (Truste, Better
Business Bureau, Online Privacy Alliance)
Offer incentives to buy to overcome security
concerns (e.g. web discount) and publicize 3rd
party security measures (RSA, Verisign)
Reward buyers to reinforce behavior and
encourage future purchases (e.g reward points)
Make your web site easy to navigate even for web
“newbies”
16
E-tailing Model (Cont.)
Web site navigation reflects how the prospect
interacts with the site in distinct stages
Stage 1: Attraction – visitor is attracted to site
Stage 2: Interaction – visitor views pages of
interest, forms attitudes
Stage 4: Transaction – visitor buys
Stage 5: Satisfaction – visitor receives product and
is happy, leading to further attraction
17
E-tailing Model (Cont.)
Satisfaction depends largely on front and
back office operations much of which operate
behind the scenes
Order receipt, order verification, order
assembly, order packing, order shipping
Payment receipt, payment processing
Claims receipt, claims processing
Customer service, conflict resolution
Customer records, data mining, offer
targeting
18
E-tailing Model (Cont.)
E-Commerce enabling web sites is simple
1. Shopping Carts – for relatively small number of
products
Design web site in FrontPage, Dreamweaver,or
NetObjects Fusion
Add Product Images, Multimedia
Add Links To Shopping Cart
Some shopping carts require you to use specific ISPs,
others let you choose
Advantage: complete freedom in web design
Disadvantage: have to manually update, revise links
which may be time consuming
Disadvantage: may lack more advanced features
19
E-tailing Model (Cont.)
E-Commerce enabling web sites is simple
(Cont.)
2. E-Commerce Software Packages – for larger
web sites
Build e-commerce web site from the ground up
Wizards make this process quite simple
Select templates, colors styles
Upload product database, Presto! You’re done!
Some programs require you to use specific ISPs, others
let you choose
Advantage: rapid creation, and advanced features
Disadvantage: cookie cutter look, customization takes
time
20
E-tailing Model (Cont.)
E-Commerce enabling web sites is simple
(Cont.)
3. Browser Based Solutions
Build your store with a browser (example Yahoo! Store,
Amazon.com zShops, or free offerings by Homestead,
vStore, Golinq)
Advantage: no knowledge required whatsoever
Disadvantage: cookie cutter look, very little flexibility,
store branding and promotion very problematic (e.g.
difficult to implement banner ads, affiliate marketing, or
third party programs)
21
E-tailing Model (Cont.)
Once store is built, you need to process
payments
Virtually all stores use SSL, secured socket layer
technology so that credit card numbers cannot be stolen
during transaction
SET (secure electronic transaction) is more secure and
relies on electronic wallet technology using VISA –
encrypts payment information all the way to the
payment processor (even merchant can’t read card
number) limited acceptance because it is more costly
22
E-tailing Model (Cont.)
Payment Methods:
Dominate means of payment online remains credit card
No widely accepted digital cash
E-Charge promotes payment on phone or ISP bill
Mon-e promotes electronic debit through purchase of
web money cards
Visa and Citibank also promoting “web ready” credit
cards and electronic wallets
Not widely accepted thus far
Problem: merchants must sign on
23
E-tailing Model (Cont.)
Payment Processing
You cannot use existing non-internet merchant
account
New internet merchant account needed
Banks and brokers provide these accounts
Or, third parties like ccnow will process credit
cards for you (for a fee)
Watch out for fraud! If you have a typical MOTO
(mail order telephone order) merchant account,
YOU will be left with the loss if fraudulent credit
cards used – not the bank!
24
E-tailing Model (Cont).
Payment Processing (Cont.)
Real time authorization and automatic deposit
require account with online payment processor
such as AuthorizeNet or Cybercash
However, you cannot deposit funds until product
is shipped
Customer must be informed immediately and
given options if shipment cannot be done with 30
days
25
E-tailing Model (Cont.)
Shipping & Fulfillment
Shipping, fulfillment and logistics difficult for many
firms inexperienced in this area of business
Consumers may demand overnight delivery; this
requires national distribution coverage
Costs, inventory control issues must also be
considered
Growth area in e-tailing is outsourcing of entire
logistics functions to third parties
Netship, ifulfill, ups, fedex, electroneconomy
26
E-tailing Model (Cont)
Customer Service
Consumers expect replies to email within
24 hours
Consumers expect live telephone support
Consumers expect prompt service claims
More consumers demand real time support
online while surfing
Some of these tasks can also be
outsourced (e.g. LivePerson.com)
27
E-tailing Model (Cont)
Pretend you’re a consumer
How will you interact with site
How will you buy
How will order be processed
How will order be fulfilled
How will order be shipped
How will payment be processed
How will customer service be implemented
Repeat this process for relevant scenarios
28
E-tailing: Economics
Demand Side: Consumer Issues
Supply Side: Traditional Retailer Issues
Channel Conflict
29
Consumers and E-tailing
e-tailing will need to match or exceed the
utility provided by traditional formats to
succeed
Shopping benefits provided by retail formats
influence type of merchandise that can be
sold in different retail formats
Retailers and retail formats also differ in the
type of information they convey effectively to
consumers
Reference: Alba et. Al Interactive Home Shopping, Journal of Marketing
30
Dimensions Affecting Relative Attractiveness to
Consumers of Alternative Retail Formats
Dimension Supermarket Department Category Catalog Current Future
Store Specialist Internet E-tailer
Retailer
Providing alternatives for
consideration
Number of Categories Medium Medium Low Low Low Low or High
Screening Alternatives to
Form Consideration Set
Selecting Consideration Medium High Medium Low Low High
Set
Providing Information for
Selecting from
Consideration Set
Quantity Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium High
33
Consumers and E-tailing
(Cont.)
Web superior when management and
dissemination of information quantity
main issue
However, when information quality an
issue web may or not be superior
Depends on whether product is a
search, experience, or credence good
Reference: Alba et. Al Interactive Home Shopping, Journal of Marketing
34
Consumers and E-tailing
(Cont.)
Search goods: those whose quality and
value to the consumer can be easily
assessed prior to purchase
Experience goods: quality difficult to
assess prior to purchase and usage
Credence good: quality cannot be
known even after repeated use
Reference: Alba et. Al Interactive Home Shopping, Journal of Marketing
35
Consumers and E-tailing
(Cont.)
Search goods generally do better on web
(stocks, computers, tickets)
However, digital experience goods also sell
well when trial allowed (e.g. software)
Consumer experience goods (e.g. wine) may
also sell well when communities allowed to
disseminate opinions, or product review sites
used
Consumers may also combine offline product
examination with online search and purchase
Reference: Alba et. Al Interactive Home Shopping, Journal of Marketing
36
Retailers & E-tailing
Retailers must develop new skills in:
Distribution efficiency (shipping small units to
individual consumers)
Selling assortments of complementary merchandise
to lower shipping costs and therefore net price
Collecting and using information to better market
one-on-one
Presenting product information in catalog style
Offering unique, targeted merchandise
39
Channel Conflict
Loss of control over distribution, prices, or
terms of sale because of emergence of
parallel or competing internet channel
Both direct and indirect channels may face
channel conflict because of the internet
Conflict may be internal and related to
channels the company employs, or external
and related to conflicts involving third parties
Reference: Arthur D. Little: Online And Onland: Channel Conflicts And How To Avoid Them
40
Internal Channel Conflict
1. Cross-channel cannibalization
The creation of a new channel triggers a
redistribution of sales volume in favor of new
one
When firm is channel rather than customer
focused, channel managers will fight for
volume, possibly working against one another
Example: Merrill Lynch feared significant
income reductions by moving to internet and
held out for as long as possible
Reference: Arthur D. Little: Online And Onland: Channel Conflicts And How To Avoid Them
41
Internal Channel Conflict
2. Underutilization of real estate
Most retail channels comprise physical assets,
such as stores, branch offices, etc.
Moving online may cause underutilization of
these assets and lower profitability
Example: Barclay’s Bank U.K. was forced to
close nearly 700 branches because of
popularity of internet banking
Reference: Arthur D. Little: Online And Onland: Channel Conflicts And How To Avoid Them
42
Internal Channel Conflict
3. Pricing
Online prices tend to be lower because of
greater price transparency, lower cost
structures of some pure play web firms and
current market share focus
May be difficult if not impossible to maintain
multiple channel pricing structure
Example: Schwab set flat rate of $29.95 for online
trade and attempted to keep offline commission at
$60; “click and mortars” face price arbitrage; get
service offline, but buy online
Reference: Arthur D. Little: Online And Onland: Channel Conflicts And How To Avoid Them
43
Internal Channel Conflict
4. Channel Desynchronization
Consumers do not differentiate among
channels but firms do
Firms may be unable to coordinate service
and warranty requirements across channels
Incorporation of separate offline entities for
tax nexus reasons, exacerbates this
Example: in many cases you may not be able to
return your online purchase to the offline store
(Barnes & Noble)
Reference: Arthur D. Little: Online And Onland: Channel Conflicts And How To Avoid Them
44
External Channel Conflict
1. Alienating Traditional Retailers
By going direct, you may alienate traditional
channel members
Channel members may withdraw support or
sabotage offline marketing efforts or turn to
competitors
Example: Compaq tried to sell direct and maintain
relationship with offline retailers by not selling to
online retailers.
Reference: Arthur D. Little: Online And Onland: Channel Conflicts And How To Avoid Them
45
External Channel Conflict
2. Losing Channel Control
Establishment of sales regions attempts to
exert control over margins and distribution
Manufacturers or intermediaries who establish
web sites may usurp existing channels and
lose control over distribution and pricing
Example: Levi Strauss went online and attempted to
prevent retailers from also selling its jeans online;
this attempt failed
46
External Channel Conflict
3. Moving Value Upstream
Manufacturers may use the web to perform
value added services that used to be
performed by channel members, thereby
reducing value added fees that distributors
can charge
Example: Car manufacturers are providing a variety
of search, information, and even ordering capabilities
that used to be done by dealers – dealers are
becoming little more than temporary parking lots for
cars
Reference: Arthur D. Little: Online And Onland: Channel Conflicts And How To Avoid Them
47
Designing Channel to Minimize
Conflicts
Use a completely different brand name
online
Use different product/service bundle
online versus offline
Redefine distributor/manufacturer
relationship
Reference: Arthur D. Little: Online And Onland: Channel Conflicts And How To Avoid Them
48
Summary
Successful e-tailing requires adherence to
marketing principles
Combines skills of offline retail, direct catalog
marketing
Unique aspects of consumer behavior
Statistics show high growth
Economics compelling
Channel conflict will continue until offline,
online models merge to form unique mix of
advantages
49