This is the second class session for the subject Evaluation Workshop that I taught for thrre years at Unicda, the Dominico-Americano university in the Dominican Republic
This is the second class session for the subject Evaluation Workshop that I taught for thrre years at Unicda, the Dominico-Americano university in the Dominican Republic
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
This is the second class session for the subject Evaluation Workshop that I taught for thrre years at Unicda, the Dominico-Americano university in the Dominican Republic
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Frameworks for Learning from the Cognitive Domain,
Errors in Standard Testing, Assessment in the ¨Dimensions
of Learning ¨ model, as well as in the Multiple Intelligences and in the Backwards Design approaches, Moving Towards a Multidimensional Assessment model According to N. Gronlund, to design an effective Evaluation/Assessment System, we must make sure that this system:
Measures all instructional objectives
Covers all cognitive domains Uses appropriate test items Makes tests valid and reliable Uses tests to improve learning Errors of Standard Testing All measurements are subject to potential error. Compared with physical measurements, the errors in standard test scores are enormous. There are many sources of error. These include: Mechanical errors in transcribing short answers or multiple choice answers Consistency errors in scoring essays or extended answers Computer errors when calculating or reporting results Systematic errors from varying difficulty of different test versions Random errors arising from the physical or mental states of test-takers Bias errors: test designs that favor some groups of test-takers over others Content errors: test items that do not accurately cover the intended material Dimensions of Learning It is an innovative model that uses what researchers and theorists know about learning to define the learning process. Its premise is that five tpes of thinking -that is, the five dimensions of learning- are essential to successful learning. The Dimensions of Learning Are: Dimension 1: Attitudes and Perceptions Dimension 2: Acquire and Integrate Knowledge Dimension 3: Extend and Refine Knowledge Dimension 4: Use Knowledge Meaningfully Dimension 5: Habits of Mind In this framework, a basic assumption is that:
The assessment should focus on
students´ use of knowledge and complex reasoning processes rather than on their recall of information Multiple Intelligences Theory Howard Gardner argues that traditional schooling emphasizes only two abilities- verbal-linguistic (especially in written form) and logical-mathematical. Yet, there are many other kinds of knowledges or talents that enrich our lives and help us respond effectively to our environment. He lists the following, while emphasizing that there are many others as well. The Multiple Intelligences Visual-spatial Capacity to perceive the visual-spatial world accurately and to modify or manipulate one's initial perceptions Bodily-kinesthetic Abilities to control one's body movements and to handle objects skillfully Musical-rhythmical Abilities to produce and appreciate rhythm, pitch, and timbre, and appreciation of the forms of musical expressiveness Interpersonal Capacities to discern and respond appropriately to the moods, temperaments, motivations, and desires of other people Intrapersonal Knowledge of one's own feelings, strengths, weaknesses, desires, and the ability to draw upon this knowledge to guide behavior Logical-mathematical The abilities to discern logical or numerical patterns and to handle long chains of reasoning. Verbal-linguistic Sensitivity to the sounds, rhythms, and meanings of words; sensitivity to the different functions of language For Howard Gardner, in the near future: Not only will logical and verbal abilities continue to be assessed, but assessment also will include visual, auditory, kinesthetic, intrapersonal, and interpersonal abilities. This means assessing students' repertoire of learning strategies, skills in communicating with others, and knowledge as it is applied to day-to-day and culturally diverse contexts Backwards Design Wiggins and McTighe, curriculum experts, have created a model that they call “Backwards Design”. Understanding, the authors argue, differs from knowledge, and it can be difficult to recognize whether we're teaching for deeper understanding or shallower knowledge. In order to help identify the concept of understanding, Wiggins and McTighe propose Six Facets of Understanding that are best described by the characteristics of the learner. True understanding is present when the learner: Evidence of Understanding
· Can Explain · Can Interpret · Can Apply · Has Perspective · Can Empathize · Has Self-Knowledge Stages of Backwards Design
Wiggins and McTighe divide the
backwards design process into three stages: 1. Identify desired results 2. Determine acceptable evidence
3. Plan learning experiences and
instruction Applying the Model With this model, teachers first examine the relevant standards to identify what enduring understandings they want to address, then design assessment to show that students reached the desired understandings, and only then do they design instruction that will lead to those understandings. Towards Multidimensional Assessment The new vision of learning and evaluation of student learning reflected in the term multidimensional assessment is broad- based, relevant to real life, process oriented, and based on multiple measures which provide a rich portrayal of student learning CREDITS The information about the ¨Dimensions of Learning¨ framework was based on the handbook ¨Dimensions of Learning¨, by Robert Marzano and Debra Pickering. ¨Errors of Testing¨ appeared in ¨School Based Standard Testing¨, by Craig Bolon (May 2000), and the topics of Multidimensional Analyses, Howard Gardner’s theory, and the ¨Types of Assessments¨diagram, were ellaborated from ¨Why Should Assessment be Based on a Vision of Learning,¨ a group effort sponsored by NCREL in 1990, led by M. Kulienko et al.