The document discusses integrating management, budgeting, and strategic planning as a single system using a results-based approach. It addresses weaknesses in the current government budgeting process by proposing a more strategic structure focused on results rather than being shortsighted and fragmented. Key aspects include setting population-level results and measuring department/program performance, identifying community conditions to improve, and engaging partners to develop strategies and roles to achieve better outcomes.
The document discusses integrating management, budgeting, and strategic planning as a single system using a results-based approach. It addresses weaknesses in the current government budgeting process by proposing a more strategic structure focused on results rather than being shortsighted and fragmented. Key aspects include setting population-level results and measuring department/program performance, identifying community conditions to improve, and engaging partners to develop strategies and roles to achieve better outcomes.
The document discusses integrating management, budgeting, and strategic planning as a single system using a results-based approach. It addresses weaknesses in the current government budgeting process by proposing a more strategic structure focused on results rather than being shortsighted and fragmented. Key aspects include setting population-level results and measuring department/program performance, identifying community conditions to improve, and engaging partners to develop strategies and roles to achieve better outcomes.
AS A SINGLE SYSTEM SITI RAHAYU SELVIA NURINDAH 1 RESULTS BASED MANAGEMENT
RESULTS BASED BUDGETING
RESULTS BASED STRATEGIC PLANNING
RESULT BASED GRANTMAKING
1 GOOD MANAGEMENT IS GOOD SUPERVISION
2 GOOD SUPERVISION INVOLVES SETTING EXPECTATIONS AND
HOLDING SUBORDINATES ACCOUNTABLE
WITH USING 7 QUESTIONS TO COLABORATE TWO COMPONENTS
3 3 COMPONENTS WEAKNESS IN CURRENT GOVERNMENT BUDGET PROSES
SHORTSIGTED
FRAGMENTED
PROCESS, NOT RESULTS ORIENTED
PENJELASAN TENTANG STRUKTUR APBN YANG STR
Strategic planning often take a lot time
Make it two parts: populations part and performance part
Part 1 show “How are we doing” to support our pupulations
results?
Part II shows how each department, division, and progran is
performing What quality of life conditions do we seek to improve the communities? What would these conditional look like if we could see them? How we can we meassure the conditions? How are the communities doing on the most important of this measures? Who are the partners that have a role play ini doing better? What would it take to do better? What is our role inside that strategy?