Electrical Properties Study of Double

Perovskite Sr2FeTiO6 as a Function of

Temperature
Paper ID : 4083

Ngia Masta1 and D. Triyono1, a)

1Physic Department, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences,

Universitas Indonesia, Depok 16424, Indonesia

a)Corresponding author: djoko.triyono@sci.ui.ac.id

 INTRODUCTION
• unique electrical and magnetic
Perovskite properties
• Wide range aplication.

• http://cdn.iopscience.com/images/0022-
3727/45/3/033001/Full/jphysd397523f01_online.jpg
 INTRODUCTION
• A2B’B”O6 type
Sr2FeTiO6
• suitable for (SOFC) electrode
materials
• Cobalt free  more stable
• Lead Free  friendly
environment

• Sr2FeTiO6 have been studied (prepared

by solid state reaction).
• This paper describes for the synthesis
of Sr2FeTiO6 by sol-gel method
 Sample preparation
EXPERIMENTAL  sol gel method
reagen solvent

a) Sr(NO3)2 Citric acid

aquadest
b) Fe(NO3)3.9H2O
c) TiO2
Strired
&
pre Heated

Calcination

Pelleted

Sintered
 EXPERIMENTAL

The structure
• XRD  The powder and pellet
 room temperature, by RigakuMiniFlex 600 X-
Ray Diffracto meter with radiation source by
ሶ with 2𝜃 range from 5o to
Cu Kα (ʎ=1.5418 𝐴),
90o.

• pellet, coated by carbon

• SEM • By Phenom Pro X desktop Scanning Electron
Micrograph (SEM) at 15 kV.
• The the element of compound analysed by EDS
 The electrical properties
• IS (impedance Spectroscopy) RLC Meter
• pellet coated by carbon on both surface,
• modeled as parallel plate capacitor.
• Then it connected with probe which served as
conductor.
• Both values of impedance and phase angle
measured by RLC meter as function of
temperature
 Electrical properties
• investigated by Nyquist plot and Bode plot.
• Nyquist plot explicitly represented the effect
of temperature to impedance’s magnitude.
• Bode plot represented the frequency’s effect
(1 kHz to 1 MHz) and at various temperature
(293K- 523K)
 RESULT AND DISCUSSION
Figure 1.a) XRD patterns of Sr2FeTiO6.

(211) • single phase

Pellet
• Space Group : Pm3m
Intensity (a.u.)

(002) • Cubic Structure

(111) (112)
(022) (013 • lattice parametric
a=b=c=3,899 𝐴ሶ
Powder • chrystaline size 26
nm
20 30 40 50 60 70 80
2   degree )
b) SEM of Sr2FeTiO6
• heterogenous distribution with very small
porosity.
• well separated grainsgood agreement with
Impedance spectrum analysis observation.
 Table 1. EDS of Sr2FeTiO6
Weight Ratio (%)
Spo
Strontium Iron Oxygen Titanium
t
38 8 26 22
1 51,50 16,00 7,50 25,00
2 45,30 27,30 12,60 14,80
3 45,70 11,70 5,70 37,00
4 54,80 18,20 7,50 19,40
5 51,90 16,50 7,60 24,00
6 53,00 18,50 8,00 20,50
7 55,70 23,80 8,20 12,30
Ave
rage 51,13 18,86 8,16 21,86
The the element of compound analysed, Sr have the highest
concrentration
 140
293 K
120 323 K
348 K
100 373 K
423 K
80 473 K

Zreal
523 K
60

40

20

0
-1 0 1 2 3
log f

Figure. 2.
a) Nyquist plot Sr2FeTiO6 (Zreal vs Zim).
b) Bode plot Sr2FeTiO6 (log f vs Zreal).
 𝐸𝑎 = 0,26 eV.
Figure 3.
a) Bode plot Sr2FeTiO6 (log f vs Zim)
b) The natural logarithm of relaxation time τ versus
1/T. The symbols are the experimental points and the
solid line is the least-squares straight-line fits
 CONCLUSIONS
1. The XRD data reveal
• crystal structure is cubic
• lattice parametric, a=3,899𝐴ሶ
• crystalyne size 26 nm.
2. The SEM graph exhibits
• heterogenous grain distribution with very small porosity.
3. EDS investigated the compound’s composition were Sr, Fe, Ti,
and O, with Sr as the highest concentration.
4. Nyquist plot indicated the resistivity of double perovskite
Sr2FeTiO6 decrease with temperature increasing.
5. Bode plot indicated the resistivity of double
perovskite Sr2FeTiO6 in higher frequency was
dependent with temperature.
6. The peaks of data plot between Zreal and log f
indicated the relaxation phenomena.
7. The energy activation of Double Perovskite
Sr2FeTiO6 evaluated from slope of ln τ versus 10-
3 T-1 curve obtained by 𝐸 = 0,26 eV.
𝑎
 REFERENCES

1. P. Neenu Lekshmi, S. Savitha Pillai, K.G. Suresh, P.N. Santhosh,

Manoj Raama Varma, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 522, 90-
95 (2012).
2. Sami Vasala, Maarit Karppinen, Progress in Solid State Chemistry
43, 1-36 (2015).
3. A. Sendil Kumar, P.D. Babu, S. Srinath, Materials Research Bulletin
51, 332-335 (2014).
4. J. Livage, F. Beteille, C. Roux, M. Chatry, P. Davidson, Acta
Materialia 46, 743-750 (1998).
5. Prasanta Dhak, Debasis Dhak, Manasmita Das, Kausikisankar
Pramanik, Panchanan Pramanik, Materials Science and
Engineering: B 164, 165-171 (2009).
6. Y.Q. Lin, X.M. Chen, X.Q. Liu, Solid State Communications 149,
784-787 (2009).
 The end,
Thank You