The article reviews randomized controlled trials evaluating racecadotril for treating acute diarrhea in children. A comprehensive literature search found 50 relevant studies. Meta-analysis showed racecadotril was more effective than comparators in reducing stool frequency and diarrhea duration. Racecadotril had similar tolerability to placebo and better tolerability than loperamide. The findings support using racecadotril to treat acute diarrhea in children.
The article reviews randomized controlled trials evaluating racecadotril for treating acute diarrhea in children. A comprehensive literature search found 50 relevant studies. Meta-analysis showed racecadotril was more effective than comparators in reducing stool frequency and diarrhea duration. Racecadotril had similar tolerability to placebo and better tolerability than loperamide. The findings support using racecadotril to treat acute diarrhea in children.
The article reviews randomized controlled trials evaluating racecadotril for treating acute diarrhea in children. A comprehensive literature search found 50 relevant studies. Meta-analysis showed racecadotril was more effective than comparators in reducing stool frequency and diarrhea duration. Racecadotril had similar tolerability to placebo and better tolerability than loperamide. The findings support using racecadotril to treat acute diarrhea in children.
Racecadotril in the treatment of acute diarrhea in children: a systematic,
comprehensive review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Disusun Oleh: ARIQO ALALA (1102010035) KELOMPOK 6 Dosen Pembimbing: dr. Yusnita, M.Kes, DiplDK FAKULTAS KEDOKTERAN UNIVERSITAS YARSI PERIODE 6 AGUSTUS - 6 SEPTEMBER 2018 Skenario • Seorang pasien anak laki-laki umur 6 tahun datang ke Puskesmas A dengan keluhan utama BAB Mencret sebanyak lebih dari 4 kali per hari sejak 2 hari yang lalu. Keluhan Mencret tanpa diikuti dengan lendir maupun darah. Keluhan juga demam disangkal. Dari hasil pemeriksaan didapati diagnosis Diare Akut Tanpa Dehidrasi. Kemudian dokter meresepkan obat serta terapi tambahan yaitu racecadotril untuk mengatasi diare pada anak tersebut. • Pertanyaan (foreground question) Apakah pemberian terapi tambahan racecadotril lebih baik dibandingkan dengan tanpa pemberian tambahan racecadotril pada diare anak ? PICO • Population: Anak laki-laki dengan keluhan BAB sebanyak lebih dari 4 kali per hari • Intervention: Pemberian terapi racecadotril • Comparison: Pemberian terapi placebo • Outcomes : Tingkat keefektivitasan racecadotril pada terapi diare anak Pencarian bukti ilmiah • Alamat website: https://search.ebscohost.com • Kata kunci : racecadotril AND acute diarrhea AND children. • Limitasi : Januari 2013 – Desember 2018 • Hasil Pencarian : 50
• Dipilih artikel berjudul:
Racecadotril in the treatment of acute diarrhea in children: a systematic, comprehensive review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials REVIEW JURNAL • Latar Belakang Racecadotril is a guideline-recommended option for the treatment of acute diarrhea in children but existing guidelines and previous reviews of the field are based on a small fraction of published evidence. Therefore, we have performed a systematic search for randomized controlled trials evaluating racecadotril as add- on or in comparison to other treatments.. Metode: A search was performed in PubMed, Scopus and Google Scholar without limits about country of origin or reporting language. A meta-analysis was conducted for the five most frequently used efficacy parameters. Hasil • Racecadotril was superior to comparator treatments in outpatients and hospitalized patients with a high degree of consistency as confirmed by meta-analysis for the five most frequently used outcome parameters. Kesimpulan • Based on a comprehensive review of the existing evidence, we conclude that racecadotril is more efficacious than other treatments except for loperamide and has a tolerability similar to placebo and better than loperamide. These findings support the use of racecadotril in the treatment of acute diarrhea in children. APAKAH HASIL DALAM ARTIKEL INI VALID? • VALIDITY Apakah lokasi subjek penelitian kelompok terapi atau kontrol betul-betul secara acak (random) atau tidak ? Ya. • Adakah penyertaan semua pasien dalam perimbangan pembuatan kesimpulan? Identifikasi lengkap atau tidaknya follow-up • Ya. • Identifikasi ada tidaknya analisis pasien pada kelompok randomisasi semula. Ya, sesuai pada table 2 Identifikasi ada tidaknya blinding pada pasien, klinisi dan peneliti. • Ya. • Ada tidaknya persamaan diatara dua kelompok dari awal penelitian. • Ya. • Ada tidaknya perlakuan persamaan dua kelompok selain perlakuan eksperimen. Tidak ada perbedaan signifikan pada kedua kelompok. Seperti tergambar dalam tabel 1. IMPORTANCE • Penentuan besar efek terapi (CER, EER, ARR, ARI, NNT) APPLICABILITY • Menentukan kemungkinan penerapan pada pasien (spektrum pasien dan seting) Hasil eksperimen ini dapat diterapkan pada pasien saya, karena adanya kesamaan karakterisitik, yaitu : • Usia • Jenis Kelamin • RAS
• Menentukan potensi keuntungan dan kerugian bagi pasien.
• Keuntungan : Dapat membantu mengurangi sekresi air dan elektrolit berlebih pada usus. • Kerugian : Efek samping Nausea (mual) ,sakit kepala dan Kantuk