Fuel Energizer

PRESENTED BY
GUIDED BY
MUNAVAR SAHEED KOTTEKKAT
Mrs. MARY MATHEW
H7,7631
Dept.of chemical engineering
 FUEL ENERGIZER

 It was established
in 1994 by an English Scientist.
‘FUEL ENERGIZER’ Reduce fuel consumption up
to 28%,
Magnetizer Fuel Energizer, The hydrocarbons
molecules change their configuration due to
magnetic field
Fuel actively interlocks with oxygen producing
complete burning in the combustion chamber.
 INSTALLATION
 Magnetizer fuel energizer (eg:- Neodymium super conductor
– NSCM) is installed immediately before carburetor or
injector on fuel line.
 On home cooking gas system it is installed just before burner.
 WORKING
 Most ICE fuels are liquid, but liquid fuels do not combust
until they are vaporized and mixed with air.
 Motor vehicles Exhaust consist of unburned
hydrocarbon, carbon monoxide, and oxides of
nitrogen.
 Unburned hydrocarbon and oxides of N2 react in the
atmosphere and create smog.
 Generally, fuel for an internal combustion engine
is composed of a set of molecules.

 These molecules have not been realigned and so

the fuel is not actively interlocked with oxygen.

 When Hydrocarbons in fuel contact with a magnetic

field, by the Fuel Energizer, change their orientation

 This has the effect of ensuring that the fuel actively

interlocks with the oxygen, complete combustion take
place
SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM
 RESULT
 Higher engine output
 better fuel economy
 reduction in the hydrocarbons, carbon monoxide and
oxides of nitrogen that are emitted through the
exhaust.
 The ionization of the fuel also helps to dissolve the
carbon build-up in carburetor jets, fuel injectors and
combustion chambers, keeping the engine clean.
THE MAGNETIZER & HYDROCARBON
FUEL
 The simplest of hydrocarbons, methane, (CH4) is the major
(90%) constituent of natural gas (fuel)
 It is an important source of hydrogen. Its molecule is
composed of one C atom and four H2 atoms, and is electrically
neutral.
 Hydrogen, the lightest and most basic element known to man,
is the major constituent of hydrocarbon fuels.
 It has one positive charge (proton) and one negative charge
(electron), i.e. it possesses a dipole moment.
 It can be either diamagnetic or paramagnetic depending on
the relative orientation of its nucleus spins.
 In the para H2 molecule, which occupies the even
rotation levels (quantum number), the spin state of
one atom relative to another is in the opposite direction
 In ortho H2 molecule have the odd rotation levels with
spins parallel.
 Ortho hydrogen is more reactive than para hydrogen.
 Ortho Hydrogen readily react with incoming oxygen.
 EFFECT OF MAGNETIC FIELD
 Conversion of para to ortho hydrogen occurs.
 Declustering of hydrocarbons resulting in effective
mixing with oxygen.
 Oxygen can effectively react with carbon In
hydrocarbons under high intensity magnetic field.
 Increased oxidation means increased combustion
The following rules had to be taken into
consideration
 Rule 1:
Unburned hydrocarbon (HC) as well as carbon
monoxide (CO) emitted from a vehicle's exhaust system
can be viewed as the additional fuel reserve, since, if proper
conditions are met, HC & CO can be further burned in the
combustion chamber. Therefore, creating such proper
combustion conditions is paramount.
 Rule 2:
Hydrogen's chemical reaction, determined by its
valence (the electron "surplus" in the "outer" orbital shell),
is affected by a magnetic field since proper magnets are the
prime source of control of the position of electrons.
 Rule 3:
The application of a proper magnetic field enforces
beneficial changes in fuel structure and enhances its
general reactivity in the combustion process.

 Rule 4:
If a hydrocarbon molecule could better bind with
oxygen Molecules (be more completely oxidized), then
the toxicity of fumes would be considerably limited
and in principle, one could dispense with catalytic
converters.
A COMPARISON BETWEEN A CATALYTIC
CONVERTER AND THE "MAGNETIZER":

 Most catalytic converters require air pumps to initiate

catalysis. Which rob power from the engine, reduce fuel
economy, and are costly to install.

 Catalytic converters with air pumps reduce gas mileage -the

Magnetizer increases gas mileage and performance.

 Catalytic converters require a light-off temperature to be

attained before they become operative (between 3 to 5
miles).
 Catalytic converters are subject to meltdown under rich gas
mixtures - the Magnetizer is not. It is a fully permanent
device.

 The Magnetizer can easily be transferred from car to car

with almost no labour. Converters cannot.

 The Magnetizer units cost a fraction of the cost of the

catalytic converter system.
 Catalytic converters have a finite lifetime under optimal
conditions, shorter under adverse conditions.

 "Magnetizer Energizer Systems" constantly work better

and better as time goes on

 The Magnetizer is totally friendly to the environment.

 Catalytic converters require unleaded petrol,but energizer

works well with all types of petrol,diesel and LPG
 Magnetizer on Test Result
Toyota LPG Taxi
Fuel
Energizer
Air
Energizer

Coolant
Energizer
Emission Tested by Toyota (Test period : 28 days , Test mileage : 9,653km)
Results before Results after
Test Items Government Magnetizers Magnetizers Emission to
Limits Installed Installed Environment
(26-Mar-2004) (23-Apr-2004)
(CO) Carbon 1.0% 0.1% 0.047% -53%
Monoxide

(HC) Hydro-
Carbon 300ppm 301ppm 72ppm -76%
Compound
 ADVANTAGES
 More mileage (up to 28% increase) per litre due to
100% burning fuel.
 No fuel wastage.
 Increased pick-up.
 Reduced engine noise.
 Reduced smoke.
 OXIDES OF NITROGEN AND THE
MAGNETIZERFUEL TREATMENT :
• One of the chief reasons for the Magnetizer to have
possibility to lower the NOx level is due to the low
reactivity of nitrogen gas.
• If we can bind up all the available oxygen with the
hydrocarbon fuel, there simply will be no oxygen left over
to form then wanted nitrogen compounds.
• It appears that magnetic treatment is the simplest means
of achieving this feat the Magnetizer fuel treatment has
shown decreases in unburned hydrocarbon by 75-100%
and CO reductions of 90-100%.
CONCLUSION
 By establishing correct fuel burning
parameters through proper magnetic means
(Fuel Energizer) we can assumed that
1. an internal combustion engine is getting
maximum energy per litre
2. environment with lowest possible level
toxic emission.
 REFERENCE
 www.magnetizer.com
 Council Directive 80/1268/EEC Fuel consumption of
motor vehicles.
 Elert, Glenn (2007). "Chemical Potential Energy".
 Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research Vol. 66,
June 2007 pp. 457-463