Pseudo-pressure case For Modified

Isochronal Test Without Stabilized point;

 For Houpeurt analysis results in the form of 7.45

Pp  Pp ( ps )  Pp ( pwf )  at q  bq 2 Pp ( ps )  Pp ( pwf ) 

1.422 *106 qT  r  3 
* ln  d    s  Dq 
kg h   rw  4 

 Where;

1.422 *10 6 T   rd  3 
at  * ln     s 
kg h   rw  4 

1.422 *106 TD
b
kg h
Pseudo-pressure case For Modified
Isochronal Test Without Stabilized point;
 Brar and Aziz method
 Will be illustrated by Example 7.4
Example 7.4

GIVEN DATA:

h= 454 ft
rw= 0.2615 ft
f 0.0675
T= 718 R
p= 4372.6 psia
m 0.023 cp
cg= 1.69E-04 psia-1
gg= 0.65
Sw= 0.3
A= 640
CA= 30.8828

z= 0.87
Example 7.4 Step 1

Pp(pws)at the
beginning of each
flow rate

q (MMscf/d) Pp(pws) (psia2/cp)

31.612 1.049E+09

44.313 1.042E+09

56.287 1.038E+09

70.265 1.037E+09
Example 7.4 Step 1

t (hours) q (MMscf/d) Pp(pwf) (psia2/cp) Pp (psia2/cp)/q Pp (psia2/cp)

3 31.612 1.011E+09 1.202E+06 3.800E+07
44.313 9.848E+08 1.291E+06 5.720E+07
56.287 9.488E+08 1.585E+06 8.920E+07
70.265 9.047E+08 1.883E+06 1.323E+08
4 31.612 1.008E+09 1.297E+06 4.100E+07
44.313 9.821E+08 1.352E+06 5.990E+07
56.287 9.456E+08 1.642E+06 9.240E+07
70.265 8.968E+08 1.995E+06 1.402E+08
5 31.612 1.006E+09 1.360E+06 4.300E+07
44.313 9.793E+08 1.415E+06 6.270E+07
56.287 9.433E+08 1.682E+06 9.470E+07
70.265 8.916E+08 2.069E+06 1.454E+08
6 31.612 1.005E+09 1.392E+06 4.400E+07
44.313 9.787E+08 1.428E+06 6.330E+07
56.287 9.419E+08 1.707E+06 9.610E+07
70.265 8.888E+08 2.109E+06 1.482E+08
Example 7.4 Step 1, 2 & 3
Houpeurt analysis

2.500E+06

2.000E+06

1.500E+06
Del Pp/q

1.000E+06
y = 18293x + 564164
R2 = 0.9587
5.000E+05

0.000E+00
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
q (MMscf/d)
Step 2 and 3 find “at” and “b”
 Pp  N
  q j    q j  (Pp ) j
N N N

  2

j 1  q  j j 1 j 1 j 1
at  2
N 
N  q j    q j 
N
2

j 1  j 1 

N
 Pp
N N

N  (Pp ) j   q j   
j 1 j 1 j 1  q j
b 2
 
N  q j 
N N
  q j 
2

j 1  j 1 
Example 7.4 Step 2 & 3 Numerical
determination of at and b for 3 hour case
t (hours) q (MMscf/d) q2 Pp (psia2/cp) Pp (psia2/cp)/q

3 31.612 9.993E+02 3.800E+07 1.202E+06

44.313 1.964E+03 5.720E+07 1.291E+06

56.287 3.168E+03 8.920E+07 1.585E+06

70.265 4.937E+03 1.323E+08 1.883E+06

S= 202.477 11068.35711 316700000 5960500.113

at1= 564163.5568

b1= 18292.67465
Example 7.4 Step 4

 Plot at vs log t
Example 7.4 Step 4

t at log t at*logt logt2

3 5.642E+05 0.477121255 2.692E+05 0.2276447

4 6.247E+05 0.602059991 3.761E+05 0.3624762

5 6.794E+05 0.698970004 4.749E+05 0.4885591

6 6.807E+05 0.77815125 5.297E+05 0.6055194

2548963.557 2.556302501 1649849 1.6842

Example 7.4 Step 4

at vs log t

7.500E+05
7.000E+05 y = 413005x + 373300
6.500E+05 R2 = 0.9405
at

6.000E+05
5.500E+05
5.000E+05
0.4 0.45 0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8
log t
Example 7.4 Step 4 calculate m’ and c’

m'= 413004.5299

c'= 373299.7611
Example 7.4 Step 5, 6, 7 & 8 calculate
k, s, a, and qAOF;

kg= 6.249336796

s= -5.073733034

a= 1202750.544

qAOF= 208.8395699 MMscf/D

Example 7.4 Stabilize C method
calculate n, qe, C, and qAOF;
log Del. Pp vs log q

1.000E+09
log Del. Pp

1.000E+08

1.000E+07
10 100
log q
Example 7.4 Stabilize C method
calculate n, qe, C, and qAOF;

Stabilized C method
n= 0.62924704
qe= 94.30449184
C= 0.000460266
qAOF= 218.4260625
Deliverability testing:
 Steps of modified Isochronal tests cont.;

 Establish an extended stabilized flow rate

 Obtain n from the transient deliverability curve

and draw a line with same slope using the
stabilized flow rate to get stabilized deliverability
curve