Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Vietnam - History of Rebellion Against Foreign Invaders
Vietnam - History of Rebellion Against Foreign Invaders
By 1850
Culture clash had developed between Vietnamese
(Confucians) and the French (Christians)
Some Vietnamese had converted to Christianity
and a Vietnamese Catholic community had
developed
Some Vietnamese helped France gain a foothold
in Vietnam in exchange for weapons to use
against Vietnamese rivals
The French were threatening and undermining
the position of the Emperor who ruled by divine
right
THE FRENCH WERE VIOLENT FIRST
The French used ‘Gunboat Diplomacy’ to conquer.
Worked at night
Avoided meeting the enemy ‘head on’
Used cunning, stealth and subversion
Used psychology
Harassed the enemy when it least expected it
Relied on dedicated troops working in small units
Appealed to the community for help
What would be some of the benefits of using this
kind of warfare against the French?
1887 – FRENCH INDOCHINA CREATED1887 –
(incl. Cochinchina, Annam, Tonkin, Cambodia and in 1893 Laos
HYPOTHESIS
The Vietnamese responded to the French
invaders with violence because:
The French were violent first
Diplomacy by the Vietnamese had only led
to French dominance and Vietnamese
submission
The Vietnamese feared losing control of
their culture and their lives
The Vietnamese feared losing control
of their culture and their lives.
Let’s look at some sources to see if this is true!
Method:
entered villages/volunteered to work for their food/established trust
exhibited pamphlets, cartoons, posters, pictures, slogans, songs, drama
focused on struggles of Vietnamese people/blamed French & Japanese
stressed nationalism, patriotism and independence
ignored communist principles
reminded villagers that every Vietnamese was vital to the movement
Emotionally appealing approach to nationalism
Created concept of ‘total war’ leading to giai phong (liberation)
1930-1945 – Rise of Ho Chi Minh
August Revolution and Declaration of Independence
We see the Dien Bien Phu victory as the victory [over] the French army and [over]
the intervention of the Americans --because in the Dien Bien Phu campaign, 80
percent of the war expenditures were spent by the Americans. The Americans had
their hands in it. So the Dien Bien Phu defeat was a defeat for both the French
and the Americans. But whether the Americans had drawn the lessons from that, I
don't think so. That's why the Americans continued in South Vietnam. ...
When we received news of the Dien Bien Phu victory, everyone practically jumped
up in the air, they were so happy about it. But Ho Chi Minh said that this is only
victory of the first step: we have yet to fight the Americans. It was very clear then.