Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Griffy Reservoir Water Sampling Locations
Griffy Reservoir Water Sampling Locations
Griffy Reservoir Water Sampling Locations
7 Griffy
6
Lake
3
4
5 1
10
2
University
Lake
Sample Locality
Note: Sites 9 and 10 were added in 2011. (Site 3 was dry due to low water level)
Griffy Field Teams and Water Sample IDs
Data Analysis
and Presentation (2010)
Temp pH SpC Redox DO Alkalinity F- Cl- NO2- Br- NO3- PO43- SO42- Ca2+ Mg2+ Na+ K+
(oC) (µS/cm) (mV) (mg/L) (mg/L) (mg/L)(mg/L)(mg/L)(mg/L)(mg/L)(mg/L)(mg/L) (mg/L) (mg/L) (mg/L) (mg/L)
GRIFFY LAKE –
7 Sept 2010
Boat House Dock B1 23.0 7.94 590 141.1 165.9 0.12 49.4 0.94 1.21 18.18 35.07 12.58 38.25 11.35
Boat House Dock #2 0.12 22.7 1.48 1.72 1.80 11.04 41.14 11.90 34.75 11.48
inlet sample 1 - JB 22.0 8.10 556 4.4 159.3 0.28 46.5 0.91 1.16 18.37 58.02 20.52 24.30 2.07
Inlet sample 1 group A 0.10 54.4 0.03 0.04 16.55 50.50 9.03 13.60 1.88
Inlet Group A 0.01 75.0 0.15 13.28 14.39 5.39 17.65 1.45
"Pond" group A 30.4 7.89 215 16.9 54.2 91.8 0.02 0.13 0.10 10.24 14.62 5.39 16.50 1.91
Causeway Group 2 B 25.0 6.71 637 120.0 8.5 148.6 0.04 63.2 0.24 0.33 0.51 32.27 36.42 9.02 26.60 4.50
Causeway 2 25.0 6.96 530 155.6 0.09 55.1 0.17 0.23 0.30 30.94 42.85 10.24 30.50 5.99
The Milliequivalent (meq/l),
Units of Equivalent Weight
An equivalent is the amount of an anion or cation species needed
to add or remove one mole of electrons from a system.
Conc. Conc.
Ion Valence F.W.
(mg/l) (meq/l)
Ca+2 151 +2 40.08 7.53
Mg+2 23 +2 24.31 1.90
Na+1 165 +1 22.99 7.18
K+1 19 +1 39.10 0.49
Total meq/l cations: 17.10
HCO3-1 401 -1 61.02 6.57
SO4-2 58 -2 96.06 1.21
Cl-1 345 -1 35.45 9.73
Total meq/l anions: 17.51
EMP balances:
Total meq/l cations: 17.10 meq/l difference = 2.39%
•An acceptable analyses will have a %-difference that is less than 10%
Though, less than 5% is best.
Indicates you have accounted for all the major ions in the system and
have a “complete” analysis.
If balance is off, not accounting for an ion such as Fe, Si, Al, or OH,
incorrect dilutions,
very dilute samples,
math errors,
contamination
Stiff Diagram
Stiff diagrams are graphical representation of
water chemical analyses, first developed by H.A. Stiff Diagram –sample 3A
Stiff in 1951.
Mg SO4
A polygonal shape is created from three or four
parallel horizontal axes extending on either side of Ca HCO3
a vertical zero axis. Cations are plotted in
milliequivalents per liter on the left side of the Na Cl
zero axis, one to each horizontal axis, and anions
are plotted on the right side. Stiff patterns are
0
useful in making a rapid visual comparison
between water from different sources.
Other possible pairs:
ADVANTAGES
Fe NO3
• Can help visualize ionically related waters from
which a flow path can be determined, or;
K NO3
• If the flow path is known, to show how the
ionic composition of a water body changes
Fe CO3
over space and/or time.
DISADVANTAGE
• Only one analysis per plot.
Application of Stiff Diagrams
A. B.
Craft, 1999.
Piper Diagram
A piper diagram is a graphical
representation of the chemistry of a
water sample or samples.
The cations and anions are shown by
separate ternary plots.
In Piper diagrams the concentrations Figure 1-7 from Kehew (2001). Classification of
are expressed as %meq/L. hydrochemical facies using the Piper plot.
% meq/l
Conc. Conc.
Ion
(mg/l)
Valence F.W.
(meq/l) (% meq/l)
Ca+2 151 +2 40.08 7.53 44.34
Mg+2 23 +2 24.31 1.90 11.21
Na+1 165 +1 22.99 7.18 41.99
K+1 19 +1 39.10 0.49 2.46
Total meq/l cations: 17.10 100
HCO3-1 401 -1 61.02 6.57 37.52
SO4-2 58 -2 96.06 1.21 6.91
Cl-1 345 -1 35.45 9.73 55.57
Total meq/l anions: 17.51 100
Cations
Conc. Conc.
Ion
(mg/l)
Valence F.W.
(meq/l) (% meq/l)
Ca+2 151 +2 40.08 7.53 44.34
Mg+2 23 +2 24.31 1.90 11.21
Na+1 165 +1 22.99 7.18 41.99
K+1 19 +1 39.10 0.49 2.46
Anions
Conc. Conc.
Ion
(mg/l)
Valence F.W.
(meq/l) (% meq/l)
HCO3-1 401 -1 61.02 6.57 37.52
SO4-2 58 -2 96.06 1.21 6.91
Cl-1 345 -1 35.45 9.73 55.57
Projection
into the
upper
diamond-
shaped field
ADVANTAGES
• Many water analyses can be
plotted on the same diagram.
• Can be used to classify waters
by hydrochemical facies.
• Can be used to identify mixing
of waters.
• Can track changes through
space and temporal
relationships.
DISADVANTAGES
• Concentrations are
renormalized.
• Cannot easily accommodate
waters where other cations or
anions may be significant.
TDS (mg/L)
Anions
(norm)
cations
anions
[semi-logarithmic axis]
cations anions
Radial Plot
What is a radial plot? What type of data is used?
• A radial plot is a diagram • In this plot, the data shows
used to compare samples or milliequivalents/kilogram
values against each other, (meq/l) for various ions and
according to a standard compounds.
measurement.
• The circular plot type allows
you to easily see how values
compare based on the
shape of each section of
plot.
Radial Plot
What kinds of studies? Examples
• Studies that involve direct • Mixing phase of sea water and fresh
water
comparisons:
– Ionic concentrations
– Wind speed and velocity
– Seasonal plant productivity
– Fission track dating
– Mineral availability
Type of data
The data used in the plot was the directly measured pH without any transformation.
Many other characteristic parameters, such as temperature, conductivity, alkalinity and
so on, can also be plot as functions of time series. This plot is probably the
environmental monitoring result of the pH variation in a river, a lake or a wastewater
discharge outlet.
Time Series - pH
•Types of studies in which pH, or other similar data, is examined over time
•Evaluating ocean acidification
•Effects of rising sea surface temperature on pH through time
•Carbonate concentrations
•Monitoring seasonal cycles that affect pH, pCO2, and salinity
•Buffering capacity of a system through time
Time
[ Julian days, calendar dates, hours, minutes, seconds, years, decades, etc.]
Box and Whisker plot
• Multiples plots can be connected to show the variance of data over time or
compared to other sites to show differences.
Box and Whisker Plot
• It is often used in Environmental Chemistry to show
water quality variance over time, between areas, and
in concentration studies.
– Allows comparison range, median, spread, etc more
conclusion can be drawn than from a time plot
• Examples
– Knudson, A.C., M.E. Gunter, 2002, Sedimentary Phosphorites—An
Example: Phosphoria Formation, Southeastern Idaho, U.S.A.: Reviews in
Mineralogy and Geochemistry, v. 48, no. 1, p. 363-389.