Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Jurnal Shoulder Dislocation - Pure Text
Jurnal Shoulder Dislocation - Pure Text
Presented by:
M. Rizqi Firyal
71 2016 048
Approximately 20% of all shoulder
dislocations occur in patients aged >60 years.
Older patients who sustain a primary
shoulder dislocation are much less likely than
younger patients to suffer from recurrence.
However, older patients are more likely than
younger patients to sustain injuries to the
rotator cuff, axillary nerve, or brachial
plexus.
Rotator cuff tears are significantly more
common than nerve palsies, and rotator cuff
tears can be mistaken for nerve palsies.
Older patients with persistent shoulder pain
and dysfunction after dislocation should be
carefully evaluated for rotator cuff
pathology.
Although dislocation is a common injury in
the older population, these concomitant
injuries—especially of the rotator cuff—are
often missed
Although the incidence of shoulder
dislocation is similar between young and
elderly persons, most of the literature has
traditionally focused on young patients
because of the high rate of recurrent
dislocations in this population.
Shoulder dislocations in older patients tend
to occur as the result of low-energy
mechanisms and are associated with less risk
of recurrent dislocation; however, pain and
disability can persist for years as a result of
associated rotator cuff tears and nerve
injuries.
Carefulpatient evaluation and treatment
selection are important to provide adequate
care to older patients with shoulder
dislocation.
Approximately 20% of shoulder dislocations
occur in patients aged ≥60 years.
The rate of recurrent shoulder dislocation is
reportedly as high as 90% in patients in their
20s and 30s, but it is <10% in patients aged
≥40 years.
Differences in mechanism of injury are
largely responsible for the increased
incidence of instability in younger patients
and the increased likelihood of rotator cuff
tear in patients aged ≥40 years.
In young patients, McLaughlin and MacLellan
describe an anterior mechanism of injury in
the dislocated shoulder.
In younger patients with strong, healthy
rotator cuff tissue, a high-energy insult
results in failure of the weaker anterior
static restraints (ie, labrum, capsule).
McLaughlin speculated that, in older
patients, the posterior mechanism
constraints, composed of the rotator cuff,
are more susceptible to injury as the result
of weakening of the cuff tendons caused by
degeneration associated with aging.
Asa consequence, young patients present
with Bankart tears, that is, displaced tears of
the anterior-inferior labrum and inferior
glenohumeral ligaments, whereas older
patients typically present with rotator cuff
tears (Figure 1).
Figure 1
A and B, Illustrations of the posterior
mechanism of injury in shoulder dislocation
in an elderly patient.
A low-velocity fall
on the
outstretched hand
causes the
humeral head to
subluxate
anteriorly.
The force created
(large arrows)
results in stretching
of the anterior
capsule and
subscapularis
tendon and tearing
of the weaker
posterior rotator
cuff or
supraspinatus
tendon.
This difference in injury mechanisms explains
the different recurrence rates between the
two populations.
In the young, Bankart tears render the
shoulder inherently unstable with the loss of
the static restraints.
In patients aged ≥40 years, the rotator cuff
usually tears.
However, the rotator cuff plays a lesser role
in shoulder stability, and, in general, only
massive tears result in recurrent instability.
Therefore, older patients tend to redislocate
at a much lower rate than do their
younger counterparts.
Hence, surgical management of shoulder
dislocation in older patients should focus on
reconstruction of the rotator cuff rather than
on capsulolabral reconstruction.
Careful physical examination is crucial
because shoulder dislocation can be missed
on initial presentation.
Upon arrival to an emergency department or
physician’s office, a patient with a suspected
shoulder dislocation should receive a
standard radiographic trauma series
consisting of a true AP view of the shoulder
in the scapular plane (ie, Grashey), an
axillary lateral view, and a true
scapulolateral view.
Images should be critically evaluated for
evidence of glenohumeral joint reduction
and for subtle signs of previous dislocation
(ie, glenoid rim fractures, erosions), such as
a Hill-Sachs lesion or a bony Bankart lesion.
The greater tuberosity of the humerus should
also be closely evaluated because subtle
fractures may be missed on overpenetrated
radiographs.
Physical examination is done with the goal of
measuring joint stability and diagnosing
associated injuries.
Inspection may reveal muscular atrophy,
which may be an indicator of a chronic
problem such as chronic rotator cuff tear or
nerve palsy.
Obvious deformity, such as loss of the
contour of the coracoid, indicates an
anterior dislocation, whereas a prominent
coracoid may suggest posterior shoulder
dislocation.
Examination of shoulder passive range of
motion is crucial.
Loss of passive range of motion may be
suggestive of fracture, shoulder
subluxation/dislocation, or glenohumeral
joint stiffness, such as arthritis or adhesive
capsulitis.
Inabilityto externally rotate the arm may
suggest posterior shoulder dislocation in
which the dislocated humeral head is
mechanically blocked by the glenoid.
Isolated loss of active range of motion may
suggest rotator cuff tear rather than nerve
palsy.
Theacromioclavicular joint, greater
tuberosity, biceps groove, and coracoid are
potential sources of shoulder pain and should
be palpated.
The rotator cuff should be thoroughly
examined.
Resisted thumb down shoulder abduction in
the scapular plane suggests supraspinatus
pathology.
Similarly, weakness on resisted external
rotation in adduction and at 90° of abduction
is suggestive of infraspinatus and teres minor
pathology, respectively.
Several physical examination tests have been
described to assess for subscapularis tears,
but the most commonly used tests are the
belly press and modified lift-off.
Provocative testing is completed with
testing for shoulder
apprehension/relocation signs to obtain
evidence of existing shoulder instability.
Finally,a thorough neurovascular
examination is performed, with special
attention paid to the axillary nerve.
Axillary nerve palsy usually presents as a
painless loss of shoulder abduction and loss
of sensation in the proximal-lateral aspect of
the arm.
The arm is evaluated for brachial plexus
injury, which usually manifests as sensory
and/or motor weakness distally in the arm.
Vascular injury is assessed by inspecting for
evidence of expanding hematoma, which
may indicate arterial/venous injury after a
recent dislocation.
Distal
radial and ulnar pulses should be
evaluated and compared with those of the
contralateral side.
Radiographs play a limited role in direct
evaluation of rotator cuff pathology.
However, they can identify associated
pathologies, such as tuberosity excrescences.
A high-riding humeral head may also suggest
underlying chronic rotator cuff pathology.
MRIhas become the preferred modality to
evaluate rotator cuff tears and assess
associated shoulder injuries (Figure 2).
Figure 2
AP (A) and
scapular Y (B)
radiographs of a
70-year-old man
with anterior
shoulder
dislocation.
Figure 2
AP (A) and
scapular Y (B)
radiographs of a
70-year-old man
with anterior
shoulder
dislocation.
Figure 2
(C) T2-weighted
coronal magnetic
resonance image
of the same
patient
demonstrating a
massive, retracted
supraspinatus tear
(arrow).
Ultrasonography is a cost-effective and
noninvasive imaging modality for evaluating
rotator cuff tears.
In one study, ultrasonography correctly
identified 45 of 46 full-thickness rotator cuff
tears and predicted the degree of retraction
and width of rotator cuff tears with accuracy
similar to that of MRI.
Ultrasonography allows for dynamic
evaluation of the rotator cuff and may be
especially helpful in patients in whom MRI
findings are equivocal.
Resultsare operator dependent, however,
and ultrasonography does not provide
adequate information regarding
glenohumeral bone loss and arthritis, which
can influence treatment decisions in persons
with rotator cuff tears.
In patients in whom medical comorbidities or
indwelling metallic implants preclude MRI,
CT arthrography is a reasonable modality to
assess rotator cuff and labral integrity and
can be used to evaluate muscle atrophy.
In a study of 33 patients assessed 4 to 6
weeks following primary shoulder
dislocation, Ribbans et al visualized labral
tears in 100% of the young patients (aged <50
years) and in 75% of the older patients (aged
≥50 years) with dislocation.
Rotator cuff tear was found in 63% of older
patients and none of the younger patients.
Concomitant rotator cuff tear with anterior
dislocation of the shoulder is well
documented in older patients.
The incidence of rotator cuff tear in
conjunction with shoulder dislocation in
patients aged ≥40 years ranges from 35% to
86%.
In older patients, a posterior mechanism of
failure is observed with weakening and
disruption of the rotator cuff, but the
anterior capsuloligamentous complex
remains intact.
Tearing of these structures is more prevalent
in the older patient because rotator cuff
degeneration is correlated with increasing
age.
Infact, Yamaguchi et al demonstrated a 50%
chance of bilateral rotator cuff tear in
patients aged ≥66 years.
As a result, in older patients, the
degenerative cuff is more likely to tear than
are the much stronger capsular attachments.
A study by Porcellini et al supports this
hypothesis.
They found a strong correlation between
dislocation and supraspinatus tear in 150
patients between 40 and 60 years of age who
underwent arthroscopy for rotator cuff tears,
instability, or both.
No correlation was observed between
dislocation and capsular or Bankart lesions.
Terrible Triad
Associated Peripheal Brachial
of the
Fractures Nerve Injury Plexus Injury
Shoulders
Associated
Injuries
Chronic
Vascular Recurrent
Unreduced
Injury Instability
Dislocations
Bony injuries associated with shoulder
dislocations include compression fractures of
the humeral head (ie, Hill-Sachs lesion),
anterior glenoid rim fractures, and greater
tuberosity fractures.
Older patients, especially elderly patients
with osteoporosis, may sustain large Hill-
Sachs lesions from even lowvelocity falls.
These lesions may predispose them to
increased instability and to the need for
shoulder arthroplasty to address loss of
articular congruity and relatively easy
engagement during forward elevation and
external rotation, which leads to anterior
shoulder subluxation or dislocation.
The Hill-Sachs posterolateral humeral head
defect is a compression fracture caused by
the anterior glenoid rim as the humeral head
dislocates from the glenoid fossa.
This lesion is seen in most anterior inferior
shoulder dislocations and is largest in
recurrent and chronic dislocations.
Special radiographic views, such as the AP in
internal rotation view and the Stryker notch
view, are useful to identify humeral head
defects.
MRI can show bony pathology, but CT, with or
without threedimensional reconstruction, is
best to determine the extent of the lesion.
Greater tuberosity fractures are the most
common fractures associated with anterior
shoulder dislocation, and occurrence
increases with increasing age.
Several authors have found that patients
with isolated greater tuberosity fracture
have a better prognosis than do patients with
rotator cuff tear.
There is a decrease in the incidence of
recurrent shoulder dislocation in older
patients with greater tuberosity fracture
because the rotator cuff mechanism is
effectively repaired when the fracture
unites.
Hoveliuset al observed no recurrence in
patients with a greater tuberosity fracture
compared with a 32% recurrence rate in
patients without a fracture.
Itis our current standard practice to manage
nondisplaced fractures nonsurgically and to
operate on fractures displaced >5 mm,
especially those displaced into the
subacromial space.
However, the decision for surgical versus
nonsurgical treatment should take into
account the activity level of the patient.
Special attention should be paid to the
individual patient’s preoperative function as
well as his or her postinjury goals.
Patients who are poor surgical candidates
and those with low postinjury functional
goals should be treated nonsurgically.
Glenoid fractures associated with humeral
head dislocations are typically avulsion
fractures that occur when the humeral head
impacts the anterior capsule and labrum.
In older patients, the glenoid fractures
because the bone is weaker and
osteoporotic.
Iffracture is suspected or if there is
evidence of potential instability, an axillary
radiograph and/or CT scan may reveal the
glenoid lesion, which can be associated with
recurrent instability.
Nerve injury associated with anterior
shoulder dislocations is more common in
older persons than in their younger
counterparts.
Theaxillary nerve is the most commonly
affected, with a reported incidence of 9.3%
to 63%, followed by the suprascapular nerve
(29%), musculocutaneous nerve (19%), radial
nerve (22%), and ulnar nerve (8%).
The increased incidence in older patients
may be attributable to age-related
degenerative changes in neural tissue, which
render the nerve more susceptible to injury
in closed trauma.
Clinical features of axillary nerve palsy
include deltoid weakness or wasting that may
be accompanied by sensory deficit on the
lateral shoulder.
Although suggestive, these features are not
diagnostic in older patients.
It is critical to rule out massive rotator cuff
tear before diagnosing a nerve palsy.
Forpatients with persistent symptoms 3 to 4
weeks after dislocation and with MRI findings
that are negative for rotator cuff tear, it is
reasonable to obtain electrodiagnostic
studies to evaluate the axillary nerve.
Gumina and Postacchini used
electrophysiologic studies to evaluate nerve
palsies in patients with shoulder dislocations.