Electrochemical Monitoring For Process Optimization: Dr. Russell D. Kane - Icorrosion LLC Houston, Texas

You might also like

Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 20

Electrochemical Monitoring for Process

Optimization
Dr. Russell D. Kane – iCorrosion LLC
Houston, Texas
Organization
 Background
 Conventional corrosion control approaches
 What new approaches does electrochemical (echem)
corrosion monitoring bring for controlling corrosion and
process improvement?
 Proven Applications
 Amine gas processing
 Cooling water
 Black & white liquor
 Developing Areas
 Issues and Potential Problem Areas
 Summary
Background
What the Chemical Industry Wants
to Know About Corrosion…
Process
Design: Optimization:
Which is the most How can I better
efficient metal for operate my process
my application?
to maximize
production but
control corrosion?

Troubleshooting:
Why did is Asset
material fail by Management:
pitting corrosion? What will be the
remaining asset life
at run rate X ?

Bottom Line:
How do I know my
What solutions should I recommendations are
recommend to keep the plant working?
operating?
“Corrosion Control 101”
 Methods of Corrosion Control
 Selection of materials

 Chemical treatment

 Cathodic/Anodic protection

 Coatings

What about a new paradigm? Include:

 Better Process Control


However, a New Paradigm
Requires a Different Approach
 Need to view corrosion as a “real-time” variable
 In minutes, hours & days

 Not weeks, months & years

 Then, correlate corrosion with operations and specific


process conditions; develop automated processes that
prevent, minimize or repair corrosion damage.
Offline to Real-time Corrosion
How Can Corrosion Technology be Applied?
Monitoring
See only cumulative damage See only long term changes See periods of max. corrosion

Corrosion Rate

Corrosion Rate
M etal Loss


  
 

Date/Time Date/Time Date/Time

Off-line Online Online, Real-Time


Weight Loss Periodic UT Super ER SuperLPR technology
Advanced
Coupon • multiple technique
Off-line ER On-line ER Conventional LPR Electrochemical
electrochemical monitoring
Visual Inspection Monitoring
(New data every 7 minutes)
UT inspection (Data in minutes and differentiate
pitting from general corrosion)
Time
TimeFrame
Frame- -months Time
months TimeFrame
Frame––days/weeks
days/weeks Time
Mostly
Mostlymanual
manualtechniques:
techniques: Time
Timeframe
framestill
stilltoo
toolong
long
TimeFrame
Frame- -minutes
minutes
Only
Time
Timeframe
frametoo
toolong
long for process correlation;
for process correlation; Onlytechnology
technologyconsistent
consistent
with
for process correlation;
for process correlation; Good
Goodfor
forcumulative
cumulativedamage
damage withdirect-to-DCS
direct-to-DCSfor
forprocess
process
Good correlation & optimization
Goodfor
forcumulative
cumulativedamage
damage correlation & optimization

Timing

MONTHS DAYS MINUTES


Online Corrosion Information
Changes the Game
 This new approach is also consistent with CPI corrosion control needs:
 Faster, accurate and requires less manual labor.
 Provides integration with plant automation systems.
 Distributes important information and promotes better decision making,
increases work efficiency and aides documentation & follow-up, enabling:

Identify Correlate Optimize Closed-loop


Critical Events to Process to Corrosion
Corrosion process reduce mitigation
Events changes Corrosion Solutions

Update Automate
inspection & Instructions,
maintenance follow-up
Planning Reports & KPIs
New Capabilities of Advanced
Electrochemical Monitoring
 Corrosion Rate
 Technique: Linear Polarization Resistance Wireless Antenna

 Prime variable for control of general corrosion activity in system. Real-


time measurements in minutes. IS Self-powered
Transmitter
 B Value Housing
 Technique: Harmonic Distortion Analysis
 Correction factor (often assumed to be a constant) that is actually
determined by the mechanism and kinetics of the corrosion process;
used to increase accuracy of LPR corrosion rate.
 Pitting Factor (PF)
 Technique: Electrochemical Noise
 Measure of the stability of the corrosion process (defined as standard Extended
Cable
deviation of the corrosion current vs. corrosion current) (6-12 ft)
 Corrosion Mechanism Indication (CMI) Access Fitting &
 Technique: Low frequency impedance measurement Electrode (Sensor)

 Correlates with film formation/destruction and surface adsorption


(inhibition) processes Direct to DCS
 Measurement time Corrosion
 Variable Monitoring
Proven & Developing Applications
of Electrochemical Monitoring
Cooling Water

Corrosion
rate

 Online monitoring of water treatment resulted in reduced corrosion rate /


pitting and 85% reduction in copper dissolution rate of HX system. Most
importantly, the corrosion control was implemented online without
changing other critical plant variables.
Overview of Applications: Gas
Processing - Amine Unit
TREATED GAS
Corrosion Problem Areas

LEAN AMINE

C
O
ACID
N
FILTERS GASES
T
A
ACCU
C
M.
T
O S
R
T
A
Lean To R
Rich
B I
Amine
S P
Heat Exch.
O
R
P
B E Amine
SOUR GAS E R Reboiler
FEED R

RICH AMINE
* Highlighted areas can
be monitored by
Amine
Make-up electrochemical
techniques.
Amine Process Upset vs.
Real-Time Corrosion Rate
Spike in
differential  Real-time corrosion rate
pressure across (black line) during an upset
the regenerator
event.
 Upset was related to specific
events: ΔP and rapid change
in stream rates to reboiler.
 Corrosion rate changed from
0.15 mm/yr to 1.25 mm/yr
 Corrosion rate remained high
even after regenerator
regained some stability.
 Loss of protective corrosion
Corrosion rate films from period of local
turbulence.
 Lesson: Corrosion was not an
“always on” process, but
correlated with process
conditions and could be
controlled.
Pulp & Paper White Water:
Pitting vs. Neutralizer Control
 Pitting Factor from
electrochemical monitoring
indicated episodes of pitting
in plant white water system.
 Further examinations showed
the key role of white water
neutralizer selection in
determining its potential for
localized corrosion.
 Monitoring usage of different
neutralizers clearly shows
importance of properly

pH & Neutralizer
selected dosage rate and
type of neutralizer.
 Switch to new neutralizer
(marked as B) resulted in a
significant reduction in pitting
tendency.
Successful and Developing Applications
Critical catalyst feed rate
 Impact of water upset in HC
process environment (Rohm &
Haas and BASF)
 Corrosion in multiphase
(oil/gas/brine) environment
(USDOT field pipeline study).
New relationship  Refinery ADU, VDU & FCCU
with neutralizer feed rate systems (West Pacific Refinery)
 Amine gas processing (Shell
Canada)
 Pulp & paper plant white water
(SCA Ortvikens)
Relationship with
 Biodegradation of VOCs using
Inorganic feed rates trickle-bed bioreactor (Plant
Demonstration Project)
 H2S-containing environments
(Extensive Lab Trials / Canadian
Pipeline)
Present Experience-based Limits
for Echem Monitoring
 Need an electrically conductive environment; electrodes must be wetted
 > 100 µS - Use of standard finger-electrode or flush-mounting probes
 10-100 µS - Requires larger, more closely spaced electrodes
 <10 µS – Requires use of a special low conductivity probe

 High H2S content environments may lead to formation of a


conductive iron sulfide film on electrodes
 In severe cases, can lead to disruption of data
 Use of measured B value improves corrosion rate accuracy
 B value and CMI indicate interference of conductive films (indication to
operator to clean electrodes).

 Hydrocarbon environments can prevent accurate measurements


 Need separate aqueous phase or condensation on probe
 May require proper selection of probe type (sensor configuration)
 Turbulence to keep HC and aqueous phases mixed
 Need to know phase and flow behavior of water in system
Minimize Problems for Echem
Monitoring
HC Product
HC Product Pipeline
Pipeline Profile
Profile
 Need to understand
(general and local)
process conditions:
 Phase behavior of process
constituents (esp. liquid
water & dew point)
 Tool: thermodynamic/ionic
modeling
 Flow dynamics (turbulent /
stratified flow)
 Tool: Flow modeling / CFD
 Anticipated local corrosivity
 Tool: Corrosion modeling
 Determine probe locations System can be modeled by Predict ®-Pipe and/or Predict to
indentify locations of water drop-out and hold-up in system.
and type for max. success The highlighted locations can be electrochemically monitored
for corrosion in the local aqueous phase.
Echem Monitoring Benefits & Value
Delivered: Chemical Industry
Decrease asset replacement, extend Mitigate production losses; increase
asset service life throughput

Proactively identify susceptibility to Identify critical & risk areas; inspect


localized corrosion where most needed

Optimize materials-friendly processes Define compatible process & materials


envelope

Prevent emissions and hazardous Mitigate process and product


effluents contamination

Opportunity Value Estimates


Reduce Lost Production >$300,000 per leak
Improved Material Selection up to $500,000 per unit
Summary
 Electrochemical corrosion monitoring is a real-time and
accurate method to assess plant corrosion.
 Can be integrated with plant process control; allows process
optimization for reduced corrosion.
 Works most effectively in conductive media or subject to upsets
involving conductive media (e.g. water)
 Modern electrochemical monitoring is compatible with
modern plant control systems
 The best transmitter will not work if the wrong probe type or
monitoring location is used
 To be successful, need to understand phase behavior, fluid
dynamics and variability of corrosion in the system.
 Process, ionic and flow modeling are of great value.
 Need to understand the probe type required for accurate system
measurements.
 Emphasize:
 Probe location – Probe location – Probe location
 Probe type – Probe type – Probe type
Acknowledgement
 Honeywell Corrosion Solutions
 Dawn Eden
 Juan Hernandez
 Phil Ng
 Slawomir Kus
 David Eden

You might also like