Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Neural Network Using MATLAB
Neural Network Using MATLAB
1
Contents
1. Introduction
2. Aims and Objectives
3. Literature Review
4. Methodology
5. Results
6. Discussion
7. Recommendations
8. Conclusion
9. References 2
Introduction
3
Aims and Objectives
100
1 2 3 4 5 6
4
Literature Review
Wellbore Drilling
Parameters
Fundamentals of
Artificial Neural
Networks
5
Wellbore Drilling Parameters
Wellbore Drilling
Parameters
6
Wellbore Drilling Parameters
Wellbore Drilling
Parameters
7
Wellbore Drilling Parameters
Wellbore Drilling
Parameters
Lithology Formation Name Bit Size Bit Type Bit Total Flow Area
8
Wellbore Drilling Parameters
Wellbore Drilling
Parameters
Lithology Formation Name Bit Size Bit Type Bit Total Flow Area
Rate Of
Drilling Depth Weight On Bit Rotary Speed Torque Pump Flow Rate
Penetration
9
Previous Drilling Analysis Methods
Hareland et al.
Bourgoyne & Young
1965 1987
1974 2010 Our
Project
Well
Real-time
monitoring
Monitoring &
Bingham system Warren
Optimization 2018-
improves
7
Limitations of Previous Methods
✘
● Based on research done in a different region with
Inconsistent Predictions different lithology
● “Capped” accuracy depending on lithology similarity
✘
● Accurate but impractical
● Unrepresentative sample
Developed using Lab Results ● Uses too many variables as a control
● Does not make use of field data
✘
● Ignores many variables affecting ROP
Oversimplified ● Oversimplifies relationship between drilling
parameters
8
Benefits of ANN Method
✔
● Model was developed with vast amount of field data.
Developed using Field Data ● Field data provides a better representation of the
Cooper Basin.
✔
● Takes into consideration many drilling parameters.
Complex Model ● In depth understanding of the relationship of these
parameters.
✔
● Uses history matched data and an understanding of
Optimum Relationships parameter relationships to provide better parameter
recommendations.
9
Fundamentals of ANN
10
Fundamentals of ANN
10
ANN Capabilities
11
Methodology
Data Collection Data Processing Analysis of Rock Correlation Coefficient Neural Network
Matrix Strength Analysis Algorithm 12
Data Collection
13
Data Processing
Screening
Clustering Identifying
Compiling Validating 14
Rock Matrix Strength
Bit weight exponent
Weight on Bit (klbs)
Y Y Y
X X X
Strong Positive Correlation Strong Negative Correlation Weak Correlation
r = 0.9 r = -0.9 r = 0.1 16
Artificial Neural Network
• The selection was based upon including the data that was from the same depth region as the
Coonatie wells identified in Group 1 20
Results – Hutton Group Comparison
Coonatie Well Group Expanded Well Group
-4.75%
-3.11% -1.58%
-3.21%
21
Results – Combined Hutton Group
6800
7000
Data used to
train NN
7200
7400
Depth (ft)
7600
Data used to
7800 validate NN
8000
Data used to
8200
test NN
8400
8600
23
Results – Adori Data Collection
• Substantial quantity of data over a significant range with the majority between 5900ft – 7400ft
• No significant grouping of wells such as the Coonatie group used in the Hutton analysis 24
Results – Adori Data Groups
• The selection was based upon identifying a depth range with a high concentration of data that
with reduced ROP ranges 25
Results – Adori Group Comparison
6450ft – 6850ft Well Group 6850ft – 7330ft Well Group
-0.0075%
-4.93% -4.48%
-0.003%
26
Results – Combined Adori Group
-10.28% 6450ft – 6850ft Well Group -6.77% 6450ft – 6850ft Well Group
-9.54% 6850ft – 7330ft Well Group -6.47% 6850ft – 7330ft Well Group
28
Results – Parameter Comparison
Hutton Sandstone Parameter Correlation Adori Sandstone Parameter Correlation
0.30 0.30
0.20 0.20
0.10 0.10
0.00 0.00
-0.10 -0.10
-0.20 -0.20
-0.30 -0.30
-0.40 -0.40
-0.50 -0.50
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
6200 6300 6400 6500 6600 6700 6800 6900 7000 7100 7200
Depth (ft)
12000
10000
Torque (ft/hr)
8000
6000
4000
2000
0
5800 6000 6200 6400 6600 6800 7000 7200 7400 7600
Depth (ft)
250
200
ROP (ft/hr)
150
100
50
0
5800 6000 6200 6400 6600 6800 7000 7200
Depth (ft)
+14.5% Combined Adori Group Data +16.0% Combined Adori Group Data
+17.4% +17.7%
0.20 0.2
0.10 0.1
0.00 0
-0.10 -0.1
-0.20 -0.2
-0.30 -0.3
-0.40 -0.4
-0.50 -0.5
AB 12
C 3
36
Conclusion
Hutton Adori
37