TRAINING OF TRAINER

(ToT)
2018

ARIF BURHANUDIN
TIKA DESTIRATRI S.
 DEBATING FORMAT

CASE BUILDING

3 VS 3
Government
30 MINUTES : PREPARED
30 MINUTES : IMPROMPTU

Vs
Opposition
PARLIAMENTARY DO
Reply Printed Materials
SYSTEM (Book, Magazine,
4’ 20”
Newspaper, Articles)

Substantive WSDC DON’T

8’ 20” HP, Internet, 4th Party
 SPEAKING ORDER
AFFIRMATIVE OPPOSITION

1 1

2 2

3 3

R R
 ROUNDS
PRELIMINARY ELIMINARY

PRELIM 2 PRELIM 4 OCTO SEMI

QUARTER
PRELIM 1 PRELIM 3 PRELIM 5 FINAL
SPEAKER STANDING RECORD
 TEAM RANKING

1 2 34 5 Dst. VICTORY
POINT

TEAM
SCORE

MARGIN
 BEST SPEAKER

?
*If more than one If come from the same
Total individual score Consistency of the score
speaker in the toppest team, decided from the
during 3 preliminary rank, will be decided
rounds* score in elimination
from ranking of the (Pre/semi)
team
 SCORING

40% 40% 20%

MANNER MATTER METHOD
HOW TO DELIVER CONTAIN
Public Speaking Relevance Structure
Effectivity Depth of Analysis Signposting
Language Strength of Arguments Role speaker
Gesture Logic/illogical Over time, Under time?
CLARITY etc
SPEAKER SCORE

WSDC Debate Rules 2015

 SPEAKER ROLE

AFFIRMATIVE OPPOSITION
Set-up debate Clarify (if needed)
Rebuttals
- Background (what is happening, what is the
Explain
problem) SPEAKER - Theme Line
- Defining keywords of the motion

1
- Goal
- Explain the goal of the team
- Stance
- Stance
- Team split
- Mechanism (if needed)
- Theme Line : redline.
- Team split : distribution of role

ARGUMENTS to support the ARGUMENTS to against the

motion motion
 SPEAKER ROLE

- Giving responses (rebuttals)

SPEAKER - Explain Arguments

2 - Further Implications, harms vs benefit, stakeholders and

scenario analysis
+/-
 SPEAKER ROLE

- Clarify
- Giving Rebuttals/responses
- Explain clashes of the debate
SPEAKER
- NO new arguments
3 - YES new analysis, examples, data, precedence, etc

+/-
 SPEAKER ROLE

- Over-view the debate

- What were the clashes

- The strength of your team
REPLY - The failure of opponent in giving arguments or response
+/- - Proving why your team deserves to win the debate
 P O I (POINT OF INTERRUPTION)
Rebuttle, clarification, or
question

REPLY SPEAKER IS NOT

Time POI : 15 seconds ALLOWED TO BE
INTERRUPTED

Encouraged to offer and/or

POI ALLOWED
accept POI

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8.20
ADJUDICATOR

• Odd number (1,3,5,7)

• One Chair Adjudicator
• Voting System
• Preliminary Rounds 1-4: Verbal Adjudication (by chair)
• Last Preliminary + Eliminary Rounds  silent