1. Growth can stem from technological change or increases in factor endowments.
2. Technological change can be commodity-neutral, affecting both export and import goods equally, or commodity-specific, affecting one sector more than the other. Commodity-specific technological change that increases export goods leads to pro-trade effects, while increases in import goods leads to anti-trade effects.
3. Similarly, technological change can be factor-neutral or factor-specific. Factor-specific technological change has the same effect as increasing the endowment of that factor. The Rybczynski theorem demonstrates how changes in factor endowments affect output.
1. Growth can stem from technological change or increases in factor endowments.
2. Technological change can be commodity-neutral, affecting both export and import goods equally, or commodity-specific, affecting one sector more than the other. Commodity-specific technological change that increases export goods leads to pro-trade effects, while increases in import goods leads to anti-trade effects.
3. Similarly, technological change can be factor-neutral or factor-specific. Factor-specific technological change has the same effect as increasing the endowment of that factor. The Rybczynski theorem demonstrates how changes in factor endowments affect output.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
1. Growth can stem from technological change or increases in factor endowments.
2. Technological change can be commodity-neutral, affecting both export and import goods equally, or commodity-specific, affecting one sector more than the other. Commodity-specific technological change that increases export goods leads to pro-trade effects, while increases in import goods leads to anti-trade effects.
3. Similarly, technological change can be factor-neutral or factor-specific. Factor-specific technological change has the same effect as increasing the endowment of that factor. The Rybczynski theorem demonstrates how changes in factor endowments affect output.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
1. technological change 2. increases in the endowment of factors Production effect of growth: • growth can occur in the export sector or factor intensively used to produce exports can increase trade • growth can occur in the import sector or factor intensively used to produce import-competing goods can reduce trade • growth can be neutral, and affect both sectors equally. Commodity-specific technological change and production effect of growth: • if technological change is specific to the export sector, then only productive capacity of the export good increases. – (the ppf stretches only in direction of export good) • if technological change is specific to the import sector, then only productive capacity of the import good increases. – (the ppf stretches only in direction of import good)
• growth can be commodity neutral, and affect both
sectors equally. technological change can be neutral, or commodity specific Obviously, • growth that causes an increase in the production of the export good (relative to the import good) will be a pro-trade production effect.
• growth that causes an increase in the
production of the import-competing good (relative to the export good) will be an anti- trade production effect. • technological change can also affect the productivity of factors. • it can be neutral, or factor-specific • A factor-specific technological change has the identical effect on production as an increase in the amount of the factor available.
• So, let’s look at the effect of an increase in a
factor. production of both goods, but has a greater effect on the good that uses the factor intensively • labour-saving technological change has the SAME effect on the PPF as an increase in labour supply
• Capital-saving technological change has the
same effect on the PPF as an increase in the supply of capital • When both L and K Grow at the same rate and we have constant returns to scale in the production of both commodities , the productivity and there fore the returns to L and K remains the same after the growth as they were before growth took place . • If only L grows ( L grows proportionately more than K) ,K/L will fall and so will the productivity of L ,the returns to L and the real per capita income . If on the other hand only the endowment grows ( K grows proportionately more than the L ) ,K/L will rise and so will the productivity of L , the returns to L , and the real per capita income . The Rybczynski Theorem The Relationship between Endowments and Outputs. • The Rybczynski theorem demonstrates how changes in an endowment affects the outputs of the goods when full employment is maintained. The theorem is useful in analyzing the effects of capital investment, immigration and emigration within the context of a H-O model. • An increase in the endowment of labor increases the production of labor intensive good and decreases the production of the other good (capital intensive good). The cone of diversification can be used to illustrate Rybczynski Theorem in the output spac e. An increase in the endowment of one factor results in either an ultra-export or import biased growth. The Magnification Effect An increase in labor endowment increases the output of labor- intensive good more than proportionately. IMMESERIZING GROWTH • This hypothesis was propounded by the famous economist Prof Jagdish Bhagwati . IMMISERIZING GROWTH
Immiserizing Growth If the terms
of trade deteriorate sufficiently, growth can be immiserizing, lowering income and welfare.