This document discusses Barr's equation for calculating the Darcy friction factor (λ) for turbulent flow in transitional pipes that are neither completely smooth nor completely rough. It provides the Colebrook-White transition formula and Barr's 1975 explicit formula for λ. An example problem applies Barr's equation to calculate the friction head loss and pressure change across a 530m long pipeline given the flow rate, pipe diameter, roughness, and change in elevation. A second example estimates the roughness of a 150mm diameter pipe from measured head loss and flow rate data. A third example uses the given pressures, flow rate, pipe properties, and Barr's equation to determine the difference in pipe elevation between the inlet and outlet.
This document discusses Barr's equation for calculating the Darcy friction factor (λ) for turbulent flow in transitional pipes that are neither completely smooth nor completely rough. It provides the Colebrook-White transition formula and Barr's 1975 explicit formula for λ. An example problem applies Barr's equation to calculate the friction head loss and pressure change across a 530m long pipeline given the flow rate, pipe diameter, roughness, and change in elevation. A second example estimates the roughness of a 150mm diameter pipe from measured head loss and flow rate data. A third example uses the given pressures, flow rate, pipe properties, and Barr's equation to determine the difference in pipe elevation between the inlet and outlet.
This document discusses Barr's equation for calculating the Darcy friction factor (λ) for turbulent flow in transitional pipes that are neither completely smooth nor completely rough. It provides the Colebrook-White transition formula and Barr's 1975 explicit formula for λ. An example problem applies Barr's equation to calculate the friction head loss and pressure change across a 530m long pipeline given the flow rate, pipe diameter, roughness, and change in elevation. A second example estimates the roughness of a 150mm diameter pipe from measured head loss and flow rate data. A third example uses the given pressures, flow rate, pipe properties, and Barr's equation to determine the difference in pipe elevation between the inlet and outlet.
Barr’s Equation & Tutorials Transitional Pipe Turbulence most pipes are neither completely ‘smooth’ nor completely rough and λ is a function of both Re and pipe roughness.
Colebrook-White Transition Formula
1 ks 2.51 - 2 log 3.7d Re This equation covers the whole range or turbulent pipe flow, ie smooth, rough and transitional Barr (1975) published another explicit formula for λ:- 1 ks 5.1286 - 2 log 0.89 3.7d Re Hydraulic Research Station : Charts for the hydraulic design of channels and pipes” in 1958 dependant variables Q, d & hf/L are presented in a series of charts for various kS values During a recent network calibration exercise the head loss due to friction over an existing 220m length of 150mm diameter pipe was calculated to be 0.6m when the measured flowrate was 7.5 litres/sec. Estimate the pipe wall roughness ks. Assume the coefficient of dynamic viscosity m for water is 1.14 x 10-3 kg/ms. Ans:0.00225 m Re=55789 =0.045 V=0.424 Water with a coefficient of dynamic viscosity of 1.0x10-3 kgm/sec, flows through a 225mm diameter pipeline at a rate of 50 litres/sec. The pipeline is 530m long and has a surface roughness ks of 0.9mm. Using Barr's equation, determine a value for the Darcy friction factor and then determine the friction head loss across the pipeline. If the pipeline falls by 2m over its length, determine the pressure change between the two ends of the pipeline. F – 0.0289 Hf=5.5m P1-p2= 34.34 kn/m2 An old water main, having a ks value of 1.5mm, has a diameter of 150mm and is 800m in length. When the flow rate Q is 17 litres/sec, the pressure recorded at the inlet is 3 bar and the pressure recorded at the outlet is 1.851 bar. Determine the difference in the pipe levels at the inlet and outlet. Take the coefficient of kinematic viscosity n for water as 1.14 x 10-6 m2/sec.
Hydraulic Tables; The Elements Of Gagings And The Friction Of Water Flowing In Pipes, Aqueducts, Sewers, Etc., As Determined By The Hazen And Williams Formula And The Flow Of Water Over The Sharp-Edged And Irregular Weirs, And The Quantity Discharged
The Water Supply of the El Paso and Southwestern Railway from Carrizozo to Santa Rosa, N. Mex.
American Society of Civil Engineers: Transactions, No. 1170