Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Aircraft Hanger Design Pre Engineered Building
Aircraft Hanger Design Pre Engineered Building
06-03-2019 1
SCOPE AND OBJECTIVES
06-03-2019 2
INTRODUCTION
06-03-2019 3
If we go for regular steel structures, time frame will be
more, and also cost will be more, and both together i.e.
time and cost, makes it uneconomical.
pre-engineered buildings, the total design is done in the
factory, and as per the design, members are pre-fabricated
and then transported to the site where they are erected in a
time less than 7 to 9 weeks
06-03-2019 4
06-03-2019 5
COMPONENTS
PRIMARY MEMBERS (Built up I Section)
• Columns,
• Rafters,
• beams of rigid frames,
• crane run ways
06-03-2019 6
SHEETING (GI SHEETS)
• Roof
• Wall
• Fascias etc
ACCESSORIES
• Ventilators
• Sky Lights
06-03-2019 7
BENEFITS OF PEB BUILDING
• Optimized design of steel reducing weight
• Reduce construction Time
• Lower Cost
• Construction efficiency increases
• High energy efficient
• Cost effective
• Seismic and wind pressure resistant
• Easy future expansion/modification
• Weather proof and fire hazard
06-03-2019 8
PRESENTATION OUTLINE
• Literature Review
• Methodology
• Work Schedule
06-03-2019 9
LITERATURE REVIEW
C. M. Meera June 2013. This paper effectively conveys
that PEB structures can be easily designed by simple
design procedures in accordance with country standards.
In light of the study, it can be concluded that PEB
structures are more advantageous than CSB structures in
terms of cost effectiveness, quality control speed in
construction and simplicity in erection. The paper also
imparts simple and economical ideas on preliminary
design concepts of PEBs.
06-03-2019 10
RAJAT PALYA(2017) different section to find out the
best section which will be cost effective, economical and
easily available.
In this study weight is determined, here results
shows that angel section is more economical.
The difference in weight is approx. 35% which is
really beneficial for a developing country
This deduction in cost is not disturbing the load
carrying capacity of structure.
Implementation of sections is as per practical use
so that we can practically implement it.
06-03-2019 11
METHODOLOGY
LITERATURE REVIEW
DESIGN SECTIONS
QUESTIONNAIRE PREPARATION
PHASE 2
SEISMIC ANALYSIS USING ETABS
QUESTIONARIE PREPARATION
DESIGN PEB BUILDING PRODUCTIVITY AND month
WORK EFFICIENCY IN SITE
DESIGN SECTIONS
literature review
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
3/6/2019 13
REFERENCE
• Dr. N. Subramanian, ‘Design of steel structures’
• Dr. N. Subramanian (2008), “Pre-engineered Buildings Selection of
Framing System, Roofing and Wall Materials”, The Masterbuilder
• IS : 800 - 2007 :- General Construction In Steel - Code of Practice.
• [5] IS : 875 (Part 1) - 1987 :- Code of Practice for Design Loads (Other
Than Earthquake) for Buildings and Structures- Dead Loads.
• [6] IS : 875 (Part 2) - 1987 :- Code of Practice for Design Loads (Other
Than Earthquake) for Buildings And Structures- Live Loads.
• [7] IS : 875 (Part 3) - 1987 :- Code of Practice for Design Loads (Other
Than Earthquake) for Buildings And Structures- Wind Loads.
14
THANK YOU
06-03-2019 15