Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Analgesic Effect of Breast Milk Versus Sucrose For Analgesia During Heel Lance
Analgesic Effect of Breast Milk Versus Sucrose For Analgesia During Heel Lance
SUPERVISOR :
dr. Yulidar Hafidh, SpA(K)
dr. Dwi Hidayah, SpA, MKes
Presented by :
Argadia Yuniriyadi.
Original Article…
Backgrounds
Pain on infant
– Invasive Medical
Procedure
– Other discomfort
condition reaction
- Behavior (crying)
- Physical (tachycardia, >stomach acid, etc)
Backgrounds
PAIN IN INFANT
• Ethical
• Repeated Pain Stimulus
– Long term child pain
responds dysfunction
(hypersensitive, over reaction)
Need :
PAIN MANAGEMENT
Background
PAIN MANAGEMENT
Sucrose
Breastfeeding Drugs
(sweet oral)
Breast Milk Vs Sucrose
• Both are the sweet oral liquid
• Breast is more naturally
• Sucrose
– Evidence proven analgesic effect on infant
– (Harrison 2011) Sucrose
• Less effective when used for prolonged and/or more
intensely painful procedures.
• poorer neurologic outcomes compared with infants who
received fewer sucrose doses
BREAST MILK
• Breastfeeding or Bottled
Background
Premature Infant
• >> more invasive medical procedural needs
• Important risk infant group
Supplemental
Breastfeeding Sucrose
Breast Milk
Subject
Assessed for eligibility
Exclusion
breastfeeding,
Inclusion
• Gastroesophageal
• had to have a reflux disease,
clinical blood • drug abuse by the
sample taken mother,
(Diagnose & • Sedative medication
Screening) to mother or child
Supplemental Feed
• Held by a nurse
3 observer
• Breast-milk
• Sterile syringe
Sucrose
• 1-2 ml sucrose 24 %
• 2 minutes before
(PIPP)
Postmenstrual age, behavioral state, heart rate, oxygen
saturation, and 3 facial actions
• COMFORTneo
alertness, calmness, respiratory response or crying, body
movement, facial tension, and muscle tone
No Failure
Treatment failure (2) No failure Exclusion (1)
Analyzed (23) Analyzed (23) Analyzed (24)
Baseline Criteria
PIPP Score
Group n Unadjusted Adjusted
Point Difference
Outcome Comparing
Unadjusted Adjusted
(Group 1+2) and 0,94 (-1,15 to 3,02) 0,61 (-1,57 to 2,78)
Primary
Group 3 (p=0,37) (p=0,58)
Group 1 and 1,62 (-0,82 to 1,93) 1,93 (-0,57 to 4,42
Secondary
Group 2 (p=0,19) (p=0,13)
COMFORT Neo Score
Group n Unadjusted Adjusted
Point Difference
Outcome Comparing
Unadjusted Adjusted
(Group 1+2) and 1,5 (- 0,5 to 3,5) 1,8 (-0,3 to 4,0)
Primary
Group 3 (p=0,14) (p=0,092)
Group 1 and 2,1 (-0,3 to 4,4) 2,7(0,3 to 5,1)
Secondary
Group 2 (p=0,09) (p=0,03)
DISCUSSION ..
..
• PAIN :
– Discomfort
Condition
PAIN PATHWAY
1. Breast feeding and
Supplemental breast milk
• Clinical Practice :
– Breast milk can give breastfed or bottle-fed
– Depend on mother attendance
• Skin to skin (breastfed), can be relief the
pain so it’s assumed to be a better way
– But the PIPP score is not significantly
different.
2. PIPP and COMFORT neo,
• PIPP Primary assessment tool in research
setting
– Higher ICC point
– But less applicable.
• COMFORTneo
– More applicable,
– Because it didn’t need to measure HR and O2
saturation
• PIPP and COMFORTneo
– Correlation coefficient 2; moderate corelation
LATE PRETERM
• Their immature pain responses
• Inadequate newborn sucking reflect
COMPARISSON Sucrose
Level Of Evidence
• Ib
RECOMENDATION
• The breast milk can be used for relief the
pain of late preterm infant during a heel
lance procedure
THANK YOU