Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Newest Critical Reading Journal 1
Newest Critical Reading Journal 1
Newest Critical Reading Journal 1
Reading Comprehension in L2
Tierney (2005) holds that learning to read is not only learning to recognize words; it is also learning to
make sense of texts.
Wallace (2005) argues that teachers need to assist language learners to critically question the
information content and the tacit ideological assumptions that the writer suggests. In other words,
proficient readers think about what they are reading, analyze it and take the necessary steps to
comprehend the text, and this process is very imperative in L2 reading instruction.
Reading strategies as conscious and flexible plans that readers apply and adapt to particular texts and
situations. Wellman (1988) argued that a strategy has to be “employed deliberately, with some
awareness” defined reading strategies as “a wide range of tactics that readers use to engage and
comprehend text“.
Metacognitive Strategies and L2 Comprehension
Devine (1993) commented that skimming a text for key information involves "the usage of cognitive
strategy, whereas assessing the effectiveness of skimming for gathering textual information would be a
metacognitive strategy"
Metacognitive reading strategies are generally classified into three groups: planning (pre-reading),
monitoring (during reading), and evaluating (postreading) strategies.
Harris et al. (1988) assert that readers who have higher metacognitive skills are able to check for
confusion or inconsistency, employ a corrective strategy, such as rereading, relating different parts of
the passage to one another, look for topic sentences or summary paragraphs, and relating the current
information to their past knowledge.
Nelson English
Proficiency Test
INSTRUMENT
The TOEFL
METHOD Junior Standard
Test
PARTICIPANTS
INSTRUMENTS
Test was administered to determine the subjects’ language Although the TOEFL® Junior™ Standard test has three
proficiency level. The test included 50 multiple-choice items sections: Reading Comprehension, Listening Comprehension
testing grammatical points and knowledge of vocabulary. and Language Form and Meaning, the researchers used only the
Students had to choose the correct answer which best completed reading exam preparation materials for the purposes of this
the sentence (see Appendix A). study.
PARTICIPANTS
The participants of this study were 111 Iranian Intermediate EFL students of grade one studying in high
school who were chosen out of a larger pool of 192 (explained in section 3.2.1). They were all female
and native speakers of Persian whose levels of education were approximately the same because they
passed the entrance exam to enter this school. In the next step, the experimental and control groups were
administered a reading comprehension section of The TOEFL® Junior™ Standard test as their pre-test.
PROCEDURES
PREPAR EXPAN
ATION TION
SELF
PRESEN EVALUA
TATION TION
PRAC
TICE
RESULT
Table 1. Descriptive statistics for both groups in pre and Table.2. The result of the two-way analysis of variance
post-tests. (ANOVA) test
DISCUSSION
The major aim of the present study was to explore the effectiveness of metacognitive strategies
instruction on the reading comprehension performance of the EFL students. As it was shown, the
experimental groups outperformed the control group on the reading comprehension performance after
the intervention. Thus, the metacognitive strategy instruction seems to have contributed to the
improvement of students' reading comprehension performance. In other words, the explicit instruction
and practice the experimental group received about how to plan and how to monitor their reading,
contributed to this improvement. In addition, the findings of this study indicate that the Cognitive
Academic Language Learning Approach (CALLA) strategy has contributed to the improvement of
students' reading comprehension performance.
CONCLUSION