Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Critical Appraisal On Meta-Analysis Study
Critical Appraisal On Meta-Analysis Study
Meta-analysis Study
Effect of green tea consumption on blood
pressure: A meta-analysis of 13
randomized controlled trials
Peng X, Zhou R, Wang B, Yu X, Yang X, Liu K and Mi M. (2014). Effect of green tea
consumption on blood pressure: A meta-analysis of 13 randomized controlled trials.
Scientific Reports. 4:6251. DOI: 10.1038/srep06251
ABSTRACT
● The aim of this study is to quantitatively evaluate the effects of green tea
on BP control.
● PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library (updated to March 2014) were
searched for randomized controlled trials evaluating the effects of green
tea on BP.
● Pooled effect of green tea consumption on BP was evaluated using fixed-
effects or random-effects model.
● Thirteen trials comprising a total of 1,367 subjects were included in the
current meta-analysis.
ABSTRACT
● The overall outcome of the meta-analysis suggested that green tea
consumption significantly decrease systolic blood pressure (SBP) level by -
1.98 mmHg (95% CI: -2.94, -1.01 mmHg; P ,0.001) and on diastolic blood
pressure (DBP) in treatment group (-1.92 mmHg; 95% CI: -3.17, -0.68
mmHg; P=0.002).
● Subgroup analyses further suggested that the positive effect of green tea
polyphenols on BP was only showed in studies using a low-dose green tea
polyphenol, with the long-term intervention duration or ruling out the
confounding effects of caffeine. The meta-analysis suggested that green
tea consumption had a favorable effect on decrease of BP.
Critical Appraisal of a Meta-analysis
● Adapted from Crombie, The Pocket Guide to Critical Appraisal;
○ The critical appraisal approach used by the Oxford Centre for Evidence
Medicine, checklists of the Cochrane Centre, BMJ editor’s checklists
and the checklists of the EPPI Centre.
● YES
● Abstract / Introduction
● Page 1; 1st Paragraph
2. Was a comprehensive literature search
conducted using relevant research databases?
● YES
● Methods: Search Strategy
● Page 6; 1st Paragraph
Comment:
Other sources of studies such as hand-searching key journals, request on listservs –
electronic mailing list and personal communication with experts or key researchers were
not utilized by the authors.
3. Is the search systematic and reproducible?
● YES
● Methods: Search Strategy
● Page 6
4. Has publication bias been prevented as far as
possible?
● YES
● Results: Publication Bias
● Page 2
5. Are the inclusion and exclusion criteria clearly
defined?
● YES
● Methods: Study Selection
● Page 6
6. Was the methodological quality of each study
assessed using predetermined quality criteria?
● YES
● Methods:
Data
extraction
and quality
assessment
● Page 6
7. Are the key features of the included studies
described? ● YES
● Table 1. Characteristics of 13 randomized controlled trials
included in analysis; Page 3
8. Has the meta-analysis been conducted correctly?
● YES
● Introduction & Methods
● Page 1; 6
9. Were the results similar from study to study?
● NO
● Discussion: Figures 2 & 3
● Page 2 – 3
10. Is the effect size practical relevant?
● NO
● Results
● Page 2
11. How precise is the estimate of the effect? Were
confidence intervals given?
● YES
● Results:
Figure 2
&3
● Page 4
12. Can the results be applied to your organization?
● YES
● Green tea is available locally
● Low dose of green tea has significant effect
● Population of the studies:
○ Usual diet
Will I recommend the
use of green tea to
decrease blood
pressure?
Will I recommend the use of green tea to decrease
blood pressure?
● For now, no.
● Effect size is not clinically relevant
● Individual study has several limitations
● Authors cannot yet also recommend specific dietary recommendations for
lowering blood pressure.