Female Labour Force Participation in India New

You might also like

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 26

Female labour force

participation in India
Resolving the conundrum

1
Conundrum
• High growth rates yet fall in female labour force participation since the mid
2000s.
• FLFP often related to
• 1.Changes in labour market structure
• 2. Social norms regarding women’s work and
• 3.Cultural factors such as religion, social mobility and family structure

2
FLFP – Female Labour Force Participation
• Economic and demographic conditions should point to an increase in FLFP
• High economic growth, averaging between 6 and 7% in 1990s and 2000s
• Demographically, our share of working age population is currently the highest
• Fall in fertility allowing women to be free to work
• If women leave the labour force, economy and household well-being will suffer
• Raising the participation of women in the labour force can boost the growth rate by
2 percentage points over time

3
India and neighbouring countries
• India has one of the lowest female labour force participation rates
• International Labour Organisation ranks India’s FLFP rate at 121 out of 131
countries in 2013, one of the lowest in the world
• Lowest in South Asia, apart from Pakistan
• Ours 27%, China’s 63.9%, Bangladesh 57.4%, Nepal 79.9% and Sri Lanka
35.1%.
• Pakistan 23.3%
4
Decline; stagnation
• Consistent decline since the 1970s
• Fell from 35% to 27% between 1990 and 2016 (World Bank Study)
• NSS data for India show that LFP rates of women aged 25-54 have
stagnated at about 26-28% in urban areas, and fallen substantially from 57%
to 44% in rural areas, between 1987 and 2011.
• Latest 2011-12 NSS estimates – 25.3% in rural areas and 15.5% in urban
areas.

5
Feminization U hypothesis?

• FLFP high in lower income countries as well as upper- middle and high
income economies
• Low in lower middle income countries creating a U shaped relationship between
national income and FLFP.
• More women in labour force at lower levels of prosperity and education, decline,
then rises again.
• Weak U in India?
• FLFP rates are 22% points below their expected level in a feminization U curve.
6
Structural conditions affecting FLFP
• Separation of work from home
• Stigma against females working outside the home (generally, or in particular
sectors)
• Societal norms that affect unmarried and married women
• Rural – purdah, seclusion, caste norms, (lack of counting of home-based,
unpaid work)
• Urban - Night shifts, safety and security issues, distance from home

7
Education and FLFP
• At present, a rising trend of women in education for longer periods
• Gender Parity in enrollment in secondary school
• Leads to their absence from the LF
• Once more women have more education, they are likely to return to the labour
force
• However, conflict between marriage and work kicks in at this point
• Also lack of “respectable” jobs
• Does education play other roles?
8
Declining child labour (6-14 age group)
• Fell from 10.6 million in 1999-2000 to 3.7 million in 2011-12
• Fewer female child labourers in the workforce

9
Changing domestic responsibilities
• Decline highest in the age cohort 30-34 yrs followed by 35-39 yrs
• In rural areas, the percentage of women engaged in domestic duties
increased from 51.8% to 59.7%
• As female children and young girl move into education, mothers have to
shoulder more work.
• An effect of gendered duties – women’s unpaid domestic work increases

10
Contd.
• Nuclearization of families; less support from other family members
• India’s gender chore gap (amount of housework done by women vs men) is
the largest of any country for which data is available.
• Another factor:
• Fall in fertility means women will have more time to devote to work
• Would lead to a fall in unpaid workers
• But decline would be for younger women who are in education now
11
Rural areas
• Chatterjee, Raveendran and Kannan
• Stagnation in agriculture
• Non-availability of non-farm rural jobs
• Lack of availability of ag and non ag jobs in rural areas reason for declining
participation

12
Mechanization of agriculture
• Increasing use of seed drills, fertilizer drills for sowing and planting. Power
weeders for weeding, harvesters and threshers
• Much of this work was traditionally handled by women –
• Men take over mechanized work displacing women, especially of marginal
and subsistence households.

13
Decline in household level animal farming
• Activities by women:
• Raising cattle, buffaloes, goats, sheep
• Production of milk, and other dairy products, production of eggs etc.
• No. of rural women engaged in these activities declined absolutely by half from 16
to 8 million in seven years. (2004-5 to 2011-12)
• Loss of common property resources
• On the other hand, dairying is becoming more popular – but mostly undertaken by
better-off farmers; even if wage employment in this sector grows, it won’t be for
women
14
Fall in demand for labour-intensive products

• In any crisis women face increased competition from men for scarce jobs
• Post the global economic crisis in 2008, negative export growth – trade
contraction
• Demand for Agro products like cashews, oil-meal, processed food
handicrafts, textile products etc. in which women participate more declined

15
Structural factors
• Growth has been in service sector that requires higher level skills and few
women possess these
• Female entrepreneurship has been rising in manufacturing and services yet
most of these are in the subsistence sector like street vendors etc.

16
Women specific hazards in the workplace
• Patriarchal society
• Male bosses
• Sexual harassment
• Workplaces are built with a male worker in mind
• Absence of toilets for women and other infrastructure – leaving them open to
harassment
• However, these have been around for ever so cannot explain recent fall in FLFP
17
Are so many women really missing from the
workforce
• Hirway – not missing but are in sectors that are difficult to measure
• Hard to demarcate from unpaid family work
• Time-use surveys can give us a better idea

18
Income effect
• Rising household income; rising rural wages from 2006-07
• Opportunity cost of domestic work increases while that of paid labour
decreases
• Hence “withdrawal from the labour force”
• Srinivas – “status trap”

19
Rising family earnings (income effect) and
Status production
• Income effect of husband’s earnings (upward mobility of family, status
considerations)
• Women withdrawn from work
• “Status production”
• “Concerted cultivation”
• Effect of doing only unpaid house and care-work resulting in
hidden/uncalculated value of human capital production

20
Unpacking upward family mobility
• Occupational as well as geographic mobility of husband
• Marriage migration of women and compulsory patrilocality
• Appropriate jobs not available for women
• “Respectable jobs” – in public sector not private sector, salaried, in sync with
household duties etc.

21
Gendered effects
• If women are not in paid/productive work their status is much lower
• We have to separate family status and woman’s status
• Results in dowry demands for ‘unproductive member’ being added to the
family
• Are there lower dowries for working women?

22
Gendered effects
• Lower status leads to unwantedness of daughters (seen as a burden)
• Relationship between rising incomes, family mobility and deteriorating sex
ratios since the late 1980s
• Daughters as burdens; daughter elimination

23
Role of policies
• Employment policies
• Role of macro, trade and structural policies
• Bangladesh – export oriented, manufacturing-centred growth strategy lead to
increasing female employment opportunities
• Same in China
• India’s growth strategy – has focused on high domestic demand and high
value service exports – generate too few opportunities for women
24
Facilitating FLFP
• Ensuring land rights, providing credit and extension services
• Expanding vocational training from just beauty business
• Increasing investments in health and education where a lot of women work
• Decreasing the double burden – home and work - and facilitating working women
• Child care facilities
• Hostel/housing facilities for single women
• Secure transport

25
Improvement in FLFP- some hopeful signs?

• Rising portion comes with receding stigma, high potential earnings of


women as their education improves further, fertility decline and better
options to combine work and family duties.
• More girls and women keen to work
• Role models in sport, media, science and technology etc.

26

You might also like