Professional Documents
Culture Documents
8d Handouts
8d Handouts
Name : ____________________
ID No : ____________________
Department/Section: ____________________
Corporate Standard
Problem Solving Process
Reporting Format
Root Cause can be defined as the factor which when changed or eliminated,
will eliminate the non-conformance or problem.
GUIDELINES:
Team champion ensures that the team activities are in right direction
Team champion sets the stage
The team champion has the authority to implement corrective actions
and system repair if necessary.
The team leader is responsible for facilitating and directing the
8D Team.
Department/persons affected or concern should be members of the team.
Special skills and experience are needed to solve the problem
Team members are considered experts on the concern.
Consensus decision making is necessary
Team size should be 4 to 10 members (effective size)
Team members are subject to re-composition.
There must be meeting and discussion (brainstorming).
Each member has a defined activity (contributing to 8D Team)
1. Who are affected by the problem? Are they represented in the team?
2. What special skills or experience will the team require to function
effectively ?
3. Who is the designated champion of the team?
Who is the team leader ?
4. Does the team really meet in the same time and place?
STEPS:
GUIDELINES:
1. What type of problem is it? (Customer complaint, quality improvement, manufacturing, etc.)
2. Have we gathered all necessary data to understand the condition of the problem?
3. Do we have more than one problem? Can this situation be broken into parts?
4. Can we list any resources and documents which might better quantify this problem?
5. Is there any evidence that this problem has surfaced before?
6. What is the extent of the problem?
7. Has the problem been increasing, decreasing, or remaining constant?
8. Is the process stable?
9. What indicators are available to quantify the problem?
10. Can we determine the severity of the problem ? Can we determine the various “costs”
of the problem ? Can we express the cost in percentages, dollars, pieces, etc.?
11. What sources of problem indicators have been used?
12. Have failed parts been analyzed in detail?
13. Have we verified the problem with on-site visits to the customer?
14. Is there an action plan to collect additional information?
15. Does the customer agree with the Problem Description ?
16. Do we have the right team members to proceed to the next step?
STEPS:
GUIDELINES:
Show inspection result in your area or per station (e.g. reject/qty inspected/failures/errors)
Prioritize goods nearest customer’s gate
Define inspection/checking method that is certain to detect the defect/failure/error
Define the change that have been implemented (compared to previous)
If inspection is sampling, define a plan tighter than that of the customer’s plan
Select appropriate sample size and frequency
Document the temporary change
GUIDELINES:
1. What sources of information have been used to define the root cause of the problem?
2. Is there a relationship between the problem and the process?
3. Is there a unique situation, or is the root cause similar to past experience?
4. Why haven’t we experienced this problem before?
5. Is there a changed within manufacturing, process, system procedure?
6. Did the problem exist at product development stage? Was it a risk build?
7. What data is available to indicate any changes in the process?
8. If the likely cause is the root cause, then how does it explain all we know about
the problem description?
9. What evidence do you have that other potential causes are actually occurring?
10. If they are occurring, what unwanted effects might they produce?
11. Are there actions that need to be taken to ensure that other potential causes
will not create unwanted effects?
12. Do we have the right members on this team for the next step?
STEPS:
GUIDELINES:
GUIDELINES:
Turn on and off the Permanent Corrective Action to verify effectiveness and record
the results.
Describe verification results in quantifiable terms
Continue Containment Activities until Permanent corrective actions are verified
effective.
1. Do the action plans represent the best possible long term solution from the
customer’s viewpoint?
2. Do the actions make sense in relation to the cycle plan of the products?
3. Have we tested the control system by simulating the problems?
4. What controls are in place to assure the permanent fix is verified as intended?
5. Have all PCA changes been integrated with our existing system, processes, and
procedures?
6. Have systems, processes, procedures, and documents been formalized and
communicated?
7. Do we have the right people on the team for the next step?
STEPS:
GUIDELINES:
1. Have we recorded the team’s work (D1-D8) appropriately so that others facing a
similar problem in the future may refer to them?
2. What unfinished business remains (e.g. 8D report completed and filed)
3. What forms of recognition have been agreed on for the team’s efforts?
4. How should individual team member’s recognition be handled?
5. How might this information be shared with others who would benefit from the
outcome?
D3 : CONTAINMENT ACTION
D7 : Prevent Recurrence
Process/System Improvement
Objectives :
To control the future by Preventing
similar problems to occur.
.
REMINDERS ON 8D REPORT
Decision Making
A process used to select the best of various options. It deals with “present”
situations where the correct decision needs to be made the first time in
order to implement appropriate actions.
RISK ANALYSIS
1. Brainstorm on “THREATS”
2. Make Risk specific
If - then statement
3. Determine Probability and Seriousness
How likely the potential problem will occur?
How serious it would be ?
4. Look at givens, wants and universals
Recommendation on what to look at.
Key Steps - One of the action plan steps that is difficult to do.