Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 66

Clean Room

Fundamentals
A Trane Seminar

© American Standard Inc. 2001 Seminar SYS_P19.PPT


Clean Room Fundamentals
1. Introduction
2. Terminology
3. Contamination sources
4. Standards and classes
5. Design considerations
6. Application considerations
7. Testing
8. Closing thoughts Objective: This Trane seminar
discusses the fundamental design
concepts used in clean rooms.

© 2001 American Standard Inc. 2 Seminar SYS_P19.PPT


Clean Room
Fundamentals
Section 1
Introduction

© American Standard Inc. 2001 Seminar SYS_P19.PPT


Introduction
Clean Room Technology
 Started some 40 years ago
 As the manufacturing technology advances,
more clean spaces are needed
 Significant number of clean rooms are
microelectronics related
 Pharmaceutical clean rooms control particles
and viable particles (mostly bacteria growth)
 HVAC challenge is to be low cost

© 2001 American Standard Inc. 4 Seminar SYS_P19.PPT


Introduction
The Facts
 Microscopic fabrication, foods, automotive
paint, medical, aerospace, biological, and
other applications require clean and/or germ-
free atmospheres
 Contamination affects health, laboratories,
hospitals, and selected manufacturing
processes
 The best place to control particulates is at the
point of generation

© 2001 American Standard Inc. 5 Seminar SYS_P19.PPT


Clean Room
Fundamentals
Section 2
Terminology

© American Standard Inc. 2001 Seminar SYS_P19.PPT


Terminology
Use Established Terminology
 Maintain a common language among everyone
in the project
 Very important in written documents
 Mission
 Objective
 Goal
 Specs

© 2001 American Standard Inc. 7 Seminar SYS_P19.PPT


Terminology (partial list)
 Aseptic space
 Clean room
 Clean space
 Contamination
 Critical parameter
 Design conditions

© 2001 American Standard Inc. 8 Seminar SYS_P19.PPT


Terminology (continued)
 High-efficiency particulate air filter (HEPA)
 a filter with an efficiency in excess of 99.97% of 0.3 micron particles

 Makeup air
 Qualification & Qualification protocol
 ULPA (ultra low penetration air) filter
 Unidirectional flow
 Validation
 Workstation

© 2001 American Standard Inc. 9 Seminar SYS_P19.PPT


Clean Room
Fundamentals
Section 3
Contamination
Sources

© American Standard Inc. 2001 Seminar SYS_P19.PPT


Contamination Sources
Categories
 External sources
 Outdoor air (makeup air)
 Adjacent spaces (doors, windows, cracks)

 Internal sources
 Personnel (one of most common sources)
 Type of activity
 Manufacturing process equipment
 Products/material
 Cleaning agents
 Processes
 Cross contamination

© 2001 American Standard Inc. 11 Seminar SYS_P19.PPT


Contamination Sources
Examples
 External source — urban areas
 Typically contains 10 million particles (> 0.3 micron)
per cubic foot

 Internal source — people


 A seated or resting person releases 100,000 particles
(> 0.3 micron) per minute

Air pollution refers to particles released outside the building, while


NOTE
contamination refers to inside the building.

© 2001 American Standard Inc. 12 Seminar SYS_P19.PPT


Contamination Sources
Contaminant Classification
 Particulate
 Solid
 Liquid

 Non-particulate
 Gaseous

 Other: ions, radiation, vibration…

© 2001 American Standard Inc. 13 Seminar SYS_P19.PPT


Contamination Sources
Elimination Is Complex
 Thoroughly understand processes to
adequately plan
 Each process has requirements which in turn
define the cleanliness class
 Goal: to control the contamination source

© 2001 American Standard Inc. 14 Seminar SYS_P19.PPT


Clean Room
Fundamentals
Section 4
Standards and
Classes

© American Standard Inc. 2001 Seminar SYS_P19.PPT


United States
Standards and Classes
 1960 — first clean room concept
(nuclear fusing and firing systems — Sandia Nat. Lab., NM. USA)
 Aviation:gyroscope assembly
 Semiconductors: microchip processing
 HEPA filters

 1966 — first federal standard -> classes


 Current version is Fed-Std-209E (1992)

 ISO Standard 14644-1 is the international


standard for clean rooms
NOTE Fed-Std-209E does not specify air flow velocity — the owner and designer
should do it!
© 2001 American Standard Inc. 16 Seminar SYS_P19.PPT
Standards and Classes
Airborne Particle Concentration Limits
Fed-Std-209E 0.5 micron ISO 0.5 micron
3 3
Class particles/ft particles/m Class particles/m3

1
2 4
1 1 35 3 35
10 10 353 4 352
100 100 3,530 5 3,520
1000 1000 35,300 6 35,200
10,000 10,000 353,000 7 352,000
100,000 100,000 3,530,000 8 3,520,000
9 35,200,000
Cn = N (0.5/D)2.2 where, Cn = concentration limits in particles ft3, N = FS 209 class, and D = particle diameter in micron
Cn = 10N (0.1/D)2.08 where, Cn = concentration limits in particles m3, N = ISO class, and D = particle diameter in micron
SOURCE: ASHRAE 1999

NOTE The concentration limits indicate the maximum number of particulates allowed
for a cleanliness class.
© 2001 American Standard Inc. 17 Seminar SYS_P19.PPT
Standards and Classes
Air Cleanliness Class Limits
Particles per Cubic
Foot
100,000
Class

100,000
10,000
10,000
1,000
1,000

100 100

10
10
1

1
0 0.1 0.2 0.5 1 2 5 10
Particle Size

Source: FED-STD-209E

NOTE The smaller is the class number and the highest is the cleanliness level.

© 2001 American Standard Inc. 18 Seminar SYS_P19.PPT


Standards and Classes
Comparison of Parameters
Cleanliness Number of Filter Average Air Air
Class Particles/ft3 Coverage Velocity Changes
Fed-Std-209E d = 0.5 micron 1 in percentages fpm 2 per hour 3

1 1 > 90 60 – 90 360 – 540


10 10 > 90 50 – 90 300 – 540
100 100 > 85 40 – 80 240 – 480
1,000 1,000 30 – 60 25 – 40 150 – 240
10,000 10,000 10 – 20 10 – 15 60 – 90
100,000 100,000 5 – 10 1– 8 5 – 48
Office 4 (2 – 4 ) 106 — — 3–6

1 Comparisons: human hair: d = 60 – 80 microns


red blood cells: d = 8 microns

2 Relative to total ceiling area


3 Room height = 3 meters (9.84 feet)
4 Consensus practice. (5) 1 m/s = 196.85 fpm

© 2001 American Standard Inc. 19 Seminar SYS_P19.PPT


Clean Room
Fundamentals
Section 5
Design
Considerations

© American Standard Inc. 2001 Seminar SYS_P19.PPT


Design Considerations
Criteria
 Control the particles within a specified limit
 The manufacturing process within the space
(room’s process) determines the cleanliness
classification
 Design of clean room, should meet specific
requirements (the use and objectives) of the
project

© 2001 American Standard Inc. 21 Seminar SYS_P19.PPT


Design Considerations
Thermal Load, Air Volumes
 Estimate thermal cooling/heating load like
other spaces, but consider the room’s
manufacturing process
 Set air volumes by:
 Class of cleanliness (refer to Fed-Std-209E)
 Air pattern
 Clean room activity level

NOTES When return air flows through perforated floor, the room’s shape matters.
The greater the class type, the greater the air volumes.

© 2001 American Standard Inc. 22 Seminar SYS_P19.PPT


Design Considerations
Examples of Clean Room Shapes
Plan View Elevation View

10 m

V = 0, 45 m/s

10 m 0.75 m V = 6 m/s

V = 0, 45 m/s
20 m

0.375 m V = 6 m/s

5m

© 2001 American Standard Inc. 23 Seminar SYS_P19.PPT


Design Considerations
Example of Single Path Unit

RA

SA
OA

© 2001 American Standard Inc. 24 Seminar SYS_P19.PPT


Design Considerations
Single Path Psychometrics
93°F DB
OA 75°F WB

72°F
ROOM (R) 50% RH

58.8°F DB
SA 54.8°F WB

76.6°F DB
M 63.8°F WB

LEAVING COIL (L) 54°F DB


53.8°F WB OA

0.98
M
L SA R

© 2001 American Standard Inc. 25 Seminar SYS_P19.PPT


Design Considerations
Example of Dual Path Unit

Stacked
OA Dehumidification Unit
Outside
(SDU)
(Primary)
Air

M SA
RA
Return
(Secondary)
Air

© 2001 American Standard Inc. 26 Seminar SYS_P19.PPT


Design Considerations
Dual Path Psychometrics
93°F DB
OA 75°F WB

72°F
ROOM (R) 50% RH

58.8°F DB
SA 54.8°F WB

68°F DB
MIXTURE (M) 58.7°F WB
25.4 Btu/lb
OA
LEAVING COIL (L) 54°F DB
53.8°F WB

0.98

MR
L SA

© 2001 American Standard Inc. 27 Seminar SYS_P19.PPT


Design Considerations
Example: Class 10,000
example room:
 floor area = 2,545.5 ft2, ceiling height = 10 ft, room volume = 25,455 ft3
 outdoor air = 93°F dry bulb, 75°F wet bulb, 38.3 Btu/lb, sea level elevation
 space set points = 72°F ± 0.5° dry bulb, 50% ± 5% relative humidity

assumptions:
 supply air temperature = 54°F DB (specific volume = 13.7 ft3/lb)
 space sensible load = 234,600 Btu/hr
 space sensible heat ratio (SHR) = 0.98

© 2001 American Standard Inc. 28 Seminar SYS_P19.PPT


Design Considerations
Example: Calculation Summary
Q = m  cp   T
m = 234,600 / [0.24  (72 - 54)] = 54,300 lb/hr
supply airflow = 54,300  13.7 ft3/lb = 743,986 ft3/hr or 12,400 cfm
air changes/hr (ach) = 746,986 ft3/hr / 25,455 ft3 = 29.2 ach

process requires 40 ach, so new supply airflow is:


 40 ach x 25,455 ft3 = 1,018,200 ft3/h3 = 17,000 cfm = 74,321 lb/hr

outdoor air (OA) required for leakage (cracks/passages):


 m = 2,627 cfm (cracks) + 1,120 cfm (passages) = 3,777 cfm = 16,542 lb/hr

© 2001 American Standard Inc. 29 Seminar SYS_P19.PPT


Design Considerations
Example: Results
conventional single-path system:
 cooling coil load, QC = m h = 74,321  7.5 / 12,000= 46.4 tons
 reheat load, QRH = m cp  T = 74,321  0.24  4.4 / 3,420 = 25 kW (7.1 tons)
 single-path system: 46.4 + 7.1 = 53.5 tons (equivalent)

alternative dual-path system (precondition outdoor air):


 separate coil preconditions outdoor air, OAL) = 54°F DB, 95% RH, 21.7 Btu/lb
 OA cooling coil load, QOA = m h = 16,542  (38.3 - 21.7) / 12,000 = 22.8 tons
 mixture of OA and R, M = 68°F DB, 58.7°F WB, 25.4 Btu/lb
 supply air condition for 40 ach, SA = 58.8°F DB, 54.8°F WB, 23 Btu/lb
 cooling coil load to cool mixed air from M to SA,
QM = m h = 74,321  (25.4 - 23) / 12,000 = 14.8 tons
 dual-path system: 22.8 + 14.8 = 37.6 tons

© 2001 American Standard Inc. 30 Seminar SYS_P19.PPT


Design Considerations
Temperature Control
 Provide stable conditions for instruments,
materials and comfort
 Range
 Controla constant temperature
 Accuracy (tolerances: ~1°F; or 0.1 – 0.5°F)
 Comfort conditions

 Use independent humidity and temperature


controls

© 2001 American Standard Inc. 31 Seminar SYS_P19.PPT


Design Considerations
Humidity Control
 The room’s process determines the required
humidity and tolerance *
 Humidity control is necessary to…
 Prevent condensation and corrosion
 Eliminate static electricity
 Maintain comfort conditions
 RH range should stay between 30 - 50% with
tolerances of ~ 0.5 to 5%

NOTE Use independent humidity and temperature control.

© 2001 American Standard Inc. 32 Seminar SYS_P19.PPT


Design Considerations
Makeup and Exhaust Air
 Makeup air (MA)
 Affects pressurization, humidity, and cleanliness
 Volume is a function of process exhaust &
pressurization
 Pre-filtered based on contamination level and relative
position to main HEPA filters

 Process exhaust air


 Process exhaust depends on the room’s process
 Exhaust air should be treated before it’s delivered to
the atmosphere

© 2001 American Standard Inc. 33 Seminar SYS_P19.PPT


Design Considerations
Pressure
 Pressurization
 Causes air to migrate to least clean area
 Differential pressure 0.05 in. wg (~0.01 to ~0.03 in. wg)
 Should be kept as low as possible

 Pressure level results from the balance of…


 Process exhaust
 Makeup air
 Leakage
 Supply and return air volumes

© 2001 American Standard Inc. 34 Seminar SYS_P19.PPT


Design Considerations
Pressurization Illustration
Airlock with
interlocked doors

Product out
(++) Gown
(++)

Aseptic Core Degown


Class 10,000 (++)
Aseptic Fill
(+++)
(+++)

Auto- Mech Auto- Oven Mech Auto-


clave space clave space clave

Formula preparation Glass wash


Class 100,000 (++) Class 100,000 (++)
(+) Room pressurization level
above zero reference
(+) (+) (+) Unidirectional airflow
(curtained area optional)
Material Personnel Equipment

© 2001 American Standard Inc. 35 Seminar SYS_P19.PPT


Design Considerations
Filtration and Type of Air Cleaners
 Filtration helps to prevent contamination
 Fibrous media unit
 Viscous impingement filters
 Dry-type extended-surface filters, low- and high-
efficiency air filters (the last)
 High-efficiency particulate air (HEPA)
 Ultra-low penetration air (ULPA)

 Renewable media filters


 Electronic air cleaners
 Combination air cleaners
© 2001 American Standard Inc. 36 Seminar SYS_P19.PPT
Design Considerations
Filters

Prefilter
Consider need for
Prefilter/Filter Final filter filtration of exhaust air

Return air

?
Outside air H&V coils, Steam Moisture eliminator Space Exhaust fan
washers, etc. humidifier (if required)

SOURCE: ASHRAE 2000

© 2001 American Standard Inc. 37 Seminar SYS_P19.PPT


Design Considerations
“Ballroom” with Fan Filter Units
Plan View Elevation View
Air handler
Make-up FFUs
air supply
to plenum

Advantage: Easy to
Visitors
corridor
change cleanliness class.

© 2001 American Standard Inc. 38 Seminar SYS_P19.PPT


Design Considerations
“Comb” with Fan Filter Units
Equipment through partition

Products
entry/exit
Clean area
Support/service area
Maintenance
corridor
Production area Clean
corridor

Maintenance shop/spare parts Dressing rooms Clean


tools
Fan filter units with HEPA filters Exhaust

Treated outside air


(make-up)

Service Return air

© 2001 American Standard Inc. 39 Seminar SYS_P19.PPT


Design Considerations
Air Pattern
 Objective
 Cleanest air at the critical areas conveyed to less
critical areas
 Large flow at low velocity
 Unidirectional movement (usually downward)

 Air flow patterns


 Unidirectional flow (“laminar”) — air evenly distributed
from one entire surface of the room (ceiling or wall)
at constant velocity
 Single direction, single pass, parallel streamlines

© 2001 American Standard Inc. 40 Seminar SYS_P19.PPT


Design Considerations
Unidirectional Air Pattern
(classes 1000, 100, 10, 1)

 Vertical
 Total displacement with ceiling HEPA or ULPA filters
(class 100 or better)
 Down-flow with HEPA filters
 Return or exhaust air perforated floor
(not recommended for pharmaceutical clean rooms)

 Horizontal
 Across a section of the room (wall-to-wall)

© 2001 American Standard Inc. 41 Seminar SYS_P19.PPT


Design Considerations
Air Pattern Unidirectional Air Flow
(classes 1000, 100, 10)

HEPA-filtering
ceiling

 The air volume of the entire room flows at an uniform velocity,


following parallel streamlines
 This “displacement flow” provides a higher cleanliness class
© 2001 American Standard Inc. 42 Seminar SYS_P19.PPT
Design Considerations
More Air Patterns
 Non-unidirectional (classes 100,000,10,000 & 1,000)
 Eithernon-parallel flow or multiple passes
 Turbulent mixing (dilution) flow, high air change rates,
and ceiling partially covered with HEPA filters

 Mixed configuration
 Non-unidirectional area flow plus unidirectional
module (currently used on pharmaceutical industry)

© 2001 American Standard Inc. 43 Seminar SYS_P19.PPT


Design Considerations
Air Patterns Illustration
Secondary
air handler
Primary
air handler
Outside
air

99.999%, HEPA or
ULPA filters in ceiling

Return air Return air

Class 10,000 Class 100


non-unidirectional airflow unidirectional airflow

© 2001 American Standard Inc. 44 Seminar SYS_P19.PPT


Design Considerations
Air Patterns Illustration

Air handler
Outside
air

In-line HEPA or ULPA filter

Return air
Return air

Class 100 Class 10,000


localized airflow non-unidirectional airflow

© 2001 American Standard Inc. 45 Seminar SYS_P19.PPT


Design Considerations
Optimize Cleanliness Class
 Restrict to class 1, 10, 100 unidirectional
airflow where the product is exposed
 Install partitions to shield “laminar flow” area
 Use class 10,000 or 100,000 turbulent mixing
flow for adjacent areas

The result will be a reduction of


installation and operating costs!

© 2001 American Standard Inc. 46 Seminar SYS_P19.PPT


Design Considerations
Noise and Vibration
 Establish noise and vibration criteria
 Noise is produced by process equipment and the HVAC
system
 Vibration is a contaminant in microelectronic plants
 Process equipment senses low-frequency vibration (more difficult
to attenuate)
 Sources: rotating machines, fluids in piping, air flowing in duct
system

 Use vane-axial fans (high rpm) instead centrifugal


(low rpm)
 Avoid reciprocating compressors (air or refrigeration)

© 2001 American Standard Inc. 47 Seminar SYS_P19.PPT


Design Considerations
Energy Savings
 Controlling a clean room requires high energy
 Treatingthe makeup air
 Air movement
 Process exhaust

 Do an energy analysis
 Fans
 Makeup and exhaust air

© 2001 American Standard Inc. 48 Seminar SYS_P19.PPT


Design Considerations
Air Conditioning Systems
 Future process/equipment changes
 Microelectronic manufacturing functions
 Flexibility
 Proper sizing
 Redundancy
 Process exhaust fans
 Life-cycle economic analysis
 Energy conservation

© 2001 American Standard Inc. 49 Seminar SYS_P19.PPT


Clean Room
Fundamentals
Section 6
Application
Considerations

© American Standard Inc. 2001 Seminar SYS_P19.PPT


Applications
Microelectronic Plants
 Require class 100 or better due to the size of
their product, circuits
 Goal is less than 1 particle 0.1 micron and larger per
ft3 of air

 Usual design types


 Cleantunnel
 Open bay

© 2001 American Standard Inc. 51 Seminar SYS_P19.PPT


Applications — Microelectronic Plants
Clean Tunnel Design
 Modular (~ 8ft to 14ft wide)
 HEPA, ULPA filters, or fan-filter modules
 Advantage
 Reduced filter coverage

 Disadvantages
 Restricts new equipment layouts
 Restricts moving products between equipment

© 2001 American Standard Inc. 52 Seminar SYS_P19.PPT


Applications — Microelectronic Plants
Clean Tunnel Design

Air duct connections


HEPA or ULPA filter
modules in ceiling grid

Work area

Tunnel
wall

Product

© 2001 American Standard Inc. 53 Seminar SYS_P19.PPT


Applications — Microelectronic Plants
Open Bay Design
(up to 100,000 ft2)

 Pressurized plenum or ducted filter modules


 30,000 ft2 or larger sometimes combine tunnel
and open bay
 Advantage
 Flexibility (equipment layout changes)

 Disadvantage
 Larger filtration coverage

© 2001 American Standard Inc. 54 Seminar SYS_P19.PPT


Applications — Microelectronic Plants
Air Flow
 Fed-Std-209E classes 100,10, and 1
 Vertical filters, unidirectional airflow
(w/ HEPA or ULPA filters)
 Pressurize plenum above filters (even pressure
may be a problem)
 Individual ducted filters (higher static loss, higher
maintenance cost due to balancing the system)
 Individual fan-filter units (FFU)

 Return through-the-floor is recommended

© 2001 American Standard Inc. 55 Seminar SYS_P19.PPT


Applications
Pharmaceutical Plants
 Distinct from other clean spaces
 Design must consider…
 Room finishes
 HVAC
 Room operations
 Controls
 Process equipment
 Utilities
 All people related to the facility should be
involved in the design phase
 They define the cleanliness class (and necessary
barrier technology or isolators)
NOTE Owner and designer must define the QP as well as drawings, specifications,
critical components, maintenance files, and training.
© 2001 American Standard Inc. 56 Seminar SYS_P19.PPT
Applications — Pharmaceutical Plants
Qualification Plan (QP)
 Functional requirement specifications (FRS)
 Critical parameters & acceptance criteria
 Qualification procedure protocols (QPP)
 Installation qualification (IQ) All should be
considered during
 Operational qualification (OQ)
the design process.
 Performance qualification (PQ)

 Standard operating procedures (SOPs)


 Preventive maintenance (PM)
 Operator & maintenance personnel training
 Approval procedure

© 2001 American Standard Inc. 57 Seminar SYS_P19.PPT


Applications — Pharmaceutical Plants
Documents
 In the USA, FDA inspection is required
 Documents that must be considered
 Code of Federal Regulations 210 and 211
 International Society for Pharmaceutical Engineering
(ISPE) Guides
 National Fire Protection Association (NFPA Std)
 Publications from the Institute of Environmental
Sciences and Technology (IEST)
 Protocols

NOTE FDA stands for Food and Drug Administration.

© 2001 American Standard Inc. 58 Seminar SYS_P19.PPT


Applications — Pharmaceutical Plants
Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP)

 Proper and repeatable method of producing


sterile products — free from particle and
microbial contaminants
 GMP documents should include test reports
for HEPA filters at operating air velocities
 Efficiency
 Pinhole integrity

 Europe
 Pharmaceutical industry adopted the European Union
Guide to GMP for Medicinal Products in 1992
© 2001 American Standard Inc. 59 Seminar SYS_P19.PPT
Clean Room
Fundamentals
Section 7
Testing

© American Standard Inc. 2001 Seminar SYS_P19.PPT


Testing
Fundamental Tests
 Cleanliness class
 Air movement
 Room (or zones) conditions

NOTE IEST describes 12 tests for clean rooms.

© 2001 American Standard Inc. 61 Seminar SYS_P19.PPT


Testing
Validation Tests
 Tests depend on clean room type
 Unidirectionalflow
 Non-unidirectional flow
 Mixed flow

 Three distinct steps to complete


 Clean room as-built
 Clean room at-rest
 Operational clean room

© 2001 American Standard Inc. 62 Seminar SYS_P19.PPT


Clean Room
Fundamentals
Section 8
Closing Thoughts

© American Standard Inc. 2001 Seminar SYS_P19.PPT


Closing Thoughts
A Successful Clean Room
 Commitment
 Teamwork (owner, architect, consultant,
contractor)
 Defined responsibility
 Judicious design, simplicity
 Procedures
 Coordination The team members should work
 Testing together for a successful, complete
product — a building that all can
 Documentation be proud of.

© 2001 American Standard Inc. 64 Seminar SYS_P19.PPT


Clean Room Fundamentals
References
 ASHRAE
 1981 Symposium: CI-81-5 No.: 3/4 (709-717)
 1986 Transactions No.: SF-86-06 (pages 272-84)
 1987 Symposium: NY-87-13-1 (1279-1287)
 1990 Symposium No.: SL-90-5-1/2/3/4 (609-633)
 1994 Transactions No.: NO-94-18-1/2 (1257-1374)
 1994 Transactions No.: NO-94-28-1/2/3/4 (1629-1651)
 1994 Transactions No.: NO-94-29-1/2 (1655-1675)
 1997 Applications Handbook
 Federal Standard: Fed-Std-209E (September 1992)
 IEST Publications
 Sulzer, Switzerland: Clean Spaces Techniques & Applications
 Brazilian Society of Contamination Control: 1994 Seminar

© 2001 American Standard Inc. 65 Seminar SYS_P19.PPT

You might also like