Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Dr. Manojkumar Shukla Professor Dept. of Electronics Engineering Registrar Harcourt Butler Technical University Kanpur
Dr. Manojkumar Shukla Professor Dept. of Electronics Engineering Registrar Harcourt Butler Technical University Kanpur
Possible Solutions:
OFDM technique employed for combating fading problem.
Efficient utilization of
bandwidth
Serial data converted
into parallel data
High PAPR add noise and increase the BER when goes
to non linearity amplifier.
In underwater Communication
Large attenuation for EM waves due to conductivity of
sea water
Optical waves affected by scattering
Optical signals requires in pointing the narrow laser
beam
Radio wave have low frequency so required large antenna
and high transmitter power
Varies according
temperature salinity, depth
At surfaces sound depend
environment
In thermocline layer sound
speed as temperature
In isothermal layer speed
increase due to increase
pressure.
Min speed is suitable for
transmission of low
frequency
Modulation Techniques in Underwater
Communication
Limited bandwidth
Spreading length = 24
Water Depth =40 meter
Data length of each user =512 bits
Salinity of water =3 %
Water temperature =14 degree Celsius
Water PH level =6
Wind speed= 14 m/s
SIMULATION RESULTS
BER performance of MIMO-IDMA System
Iteration=1,5,10,15
For 10 iterations,
satisfactory BER
achieved
Variation in data length
Iteration count= 10
Data length =
128,256,512,1024 bits
Spreading length=
8,16,24,32
BER performance
improves as
spreading length
increases due
availability of higher
count of random
interleavers
Varying Block length
It=10,sp=24,block
length=200,data length=
256 and user =16.
Improvement in BER
performance
Using three transmitter three receiver
Architecture MIMO Systems
BER increases on
increasing transmitter
and receiver count
Low bandwidth and low data rate are two major problem
associated with underwater communication.
In this case MIMO-OFDM and IDMA scheme provide
satisfactory result.
The BER performance improves by triple factor in
comparison to MIMO-IDMA scheme.
LDPC coding overcome PAPR problem to some extent.
Using higher no of transmitter and receiver, bit rate
increase but noise level also increased due to
interference.
References
B Y:
P R O F. M A N O J K U M A R S H U K L A
PROFESSOR
D E P T. O F E L E C T R O N I C S E N G I N E E R I N G
H A R C O U RT B U T L E R T E C H N I C A L U N I V E R S I T Y
KANPUR
OBJECTIVE
Simulation of SC-FDMA-IDMA
34 scheme in
underwater channel.
5/20/2019
OUTLINE
Introduction 35
1. Underwater communication
2. Various multiple access schemes
3. Hybrid multiple access scheme
5/20/2019
OUTLINE
36
Conclusions
References
5/20/2019
INTRODUCTION TO UNDER WATER
COMMUNICATION
37 (UWC)
Complex channel
Propagation of sound
5/20/2019
Long Term Evolution (LTE)
38
5/20/2019
39
5/20/2019
INTRODUCTION TO OFDM-IDMA
AND SC-FDMA-IDMA SCHEMES
40 OFDMA as well as IDMA
Hybrid scheme with features of both
scheme.
5/20/2019
3rd Generation Partnership Project
(3GPP) Long term Evolution (LTE)
41 with Cyclic Prefix (CP) in the
LTE is based on OFDM scheme
Downlink and SC-FDMA scheme with CP in the uplink .
Data in
Data out
PARAMETERS
5/20/2019
SYSTEM MODEL OF SC-FDMA-IDMA AND
OFDM-IDMA SCHEMES
44
FIGURE 6-An example of SC-FDMA transmit symbols in the frequency domain for N = 4
subcarriers per user, Q = 3 users, and, M = 12 subcarriers in the system.[26]
5/20/2019
PAPR ANALYSIS
1 n 1
PAPR max X / X n 472 2
n
n 0,1.... N 1 N n 0
Low because of its single carrier structure.
5/20/2019
Bit Error Rate (BER) ANALYSIS
48
Improved BER in OFDM-IDMA scheme.
5/20/2019
CONTD ….
49
5/20/2019
CONTD….
4 0 10-4 0 10-4
5 0 10-0.8 0 10-0.89
6 0 10-0.95 0 10-1.2
7 0 53 10-3 0 10-2.9
5/20/2019
CONTD….
-2
-3
10
-4
10
-5
10
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Eb/No
Figure-10 BER performance of SC-FDMA-IDMA scheme with IFDMA
mode for variation of number of user over UWA channel 5/20/2019
CONTD ….
OFDMA-IDMAawgn,q=2,n=8,it=5block=5
-2
-4
10
-5
10
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Eb/No
5/20/2019
Figure 11- BER Performance of OFDM-IDMA scheme for different users
With higher user data, more 57
BER is observed.
5/20/2019
Figure 12 BER performance of SC-FDMA-IDMA scheme on more no. of users
SC-FDMA-IDMA scheme 58
performs better BER
BER
OFDM- LFDMA IFDMA
Values of
Eb/No IDMA
1 10-0.7 10-0.8 10-0.9
2 10-0.7 10-0.9 10-1
3 10-0.7 10-8 10-1.2
4 10-0.8 10-0.9 10-1.3
5 10-0.9 10-1.1 10-1.4
6 10-0.9 10-1.2 10-2
7 10-0.9 10-1.8 10-2.5
8 10-0.92 10-2.2 10-2.8
9 10-0.95 59 10-2.8 105/20/2019
-3.8
With increment in receiver 60
iterations, the BER decreases BER performance of LFDMA for variation of no. of iteration
0
10
-1
10
SC-FDMA-IDMA(LFDMA)awgn,q=2,n=16,it=1block=200
SC-FDMA-IDMA(LFDMA)awgn,q=2,n=16,it=5block=200
-2 SC-FDMA-IDMA(LFDMA)awgn,q=2,n=16,it=10block=200
-3
10
-4
10
-5
10
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Eb/No
Figure 14 BER performance of LFDMA scheme for different number of iteration at higher
block length 5/20/2019
With increment in data 61 BER performance of LFDMA for variation in data length
0
lengh, the BER decreases 10
-2
10
-6 SC-FDMA-IDMA(LFDMA)awgn,q=2,n=16,it=10block=200,DL=128
10
SC-FDMA-IDMA(LFDMA)awgn,q=2,n=16,it=10block=200,DL=256
SC-FDMA-IDMA(LFDMA)awgn,q=2,n=16,it=10block=200,DL=512
SC-FDMA-IDMA(LFDMA)awgn,q=2,n=16,it=10block=200,DL=1024
-8
10
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Eb/No
Figure 15 BER performance of SC-FDMA-IDMA in LFDMA mode for variation in
data length 5/20/2019
With increment in 62 BER performance of LFDMA for variation in spreading length
spreadlengh, the BER 0
10
decreases
SC-FDMA-IDMA(LFDMA)awgn,q=2,n=16,it=10block=200,sl=4
-2
10 SC-FDMA-IDMA(LFDMA)awgn,q=2,n=16,it=10block=200,sl=8
SC-FDMA-IDMA(LFDMA)awgn,q=2,n=16,it=10block=200,sl=16
SC-FDMA-IDMA(LFDMA)awgn,q=2,n=16,it=10block=200,sl=24
-6
10
-8
10
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Eb/No
Figure 16 BER performance of SC-FDMA-IDMA with LFDMA mode for variation
5/20/2019
in spreading length
With increment in block 63 BER performance of LFDMA for variation in block length
0
length, the BER decreases 10
-2
10
-8
10
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Eb/No
5/20/2019
Figure 17 BER performance of LFDMA scheme for variation in block length
Higher BER in Acoustic 64
BER performance of LFDMA for variation in no.of block
channel 0
10
-1
10
SC-FDMA-IDMA(LFDMA)awgn,q=2,n=16,it=10block=200
SC-FDMA-IDMA(LFDMA)uwa,q=2,n=16,it=10block=200
-2
Bit Error Rate
10
-3
10
-4
10
-5
10
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Eb/No
Figure 18 BER performance of LFDMA scheme for AWGN channel and underwater
channel with optimised values 5/20/2019
With increment in receiver 65
iterations, the BER decreases -1
10
BER performance of LFDMA for uwa channel
SC-FDMA-IDMA(LFDMA)awgn,q=2,n=16,it=10block=50
SC-FDMA-IDMA(LFDMA)awgn,q=2,n=8,it=10block=50
-2
10
-3
10
-5
10
-6
10
-7
10
1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5 6
Eb/No
Figure 19 BER performance of SC-FDMA-IDMA scheme with LFDMA mode for
underwater channel 5/20/2019
0
BER performance of LFDMA for variation in no.of block
10 66
Bit Error Rate
SC-FDMA-IDMA(LFDMA)awgn,q=2,n=16,it=10block=200
SC-FDMA-IDMA(LFDMA)uwa,q=2,n=16,it=10block=100
SC-FDMA-IDMA(LFDMA)uwa,q=2,n=16,it=10block=5
SC-FDMA-IDMA(LFDMA)uwa,q=2,n=16,it=10block=50
-5
10
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Eb/No
Figure 20 BER performance of SC-FDMA-IDMA scheme with LFDMA mode
5/20/2019
in underwater channel for variation in number of block
0
BER performance of OFDM-IDMA
67 for AWGN channel
10
-2 OFDMA-IDMA awgn,q=2,n=16,it=10block=200
10 OFDMA-IDMA uwa,q=2,n=16,it=10block=200
Bit Error Rate
-4
10
-6
10
-8
10
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Eb/No
Performed simulation on the basis of user, block length, spreading length, data
length and iteration variation.
5/20/2019
FUTURE WORK
69
In future, this thesis can be extended by evaluating the
performance of SC-FDMA-IDMA scheme taking
other type of noise and demonstrating the effect of
various type of noises over the system.
5/20/2019
REFERENCES
[1]. Xingzhong Xiong and Zhongqiang Luo, “SC-FDMA-IDMA: A Hybrid MultipleAccess
70
Scheme for LTE Uplink” ©2011 IEEE.
[2]. Li Ping, Lihai Liu, Keying Wu and W. K. Leung, “Interleave-Division Multiple-Access” IEEE
Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 5, no. 4, April 2006.
[4] N. Baldo, P. Casari and M. Zorzi, "cognitive spectrum access for underwater acoustic
communications," in Proc. of IEEE Oceans Conference, Quebec City, Canada, Project No. 2007-
R/RT-2/RCM-21 September 15-18, 2008.
[5] Ethem M. Sozer, Milica Stojanovic, and John G. Proakis, Life Fellow, IEEE “Underwater
Acoustic Networks” IEEE journal of oceanic engineering, vol. 25, no. 1, january 2000.
[6] J. G. Proakis, E. M. Sozer, J. A. Rice, and M. Stojanovic, “Shallow water acoustic networks,”
IEEE Communications Magazine, pp. 114–119, Nov. 2001.
5/20/2019
Contd…
[7] Chengsheng Pan, Liangchen Jia, Ruiyan Cai and Yuanming Ding “Modeling and simulation of channel for
underwater communication network” International Journal of Innovative Computing, Information and Control
71 pp 2149-2156.
ICIC International, Volume 8, Number 3(B), March 2012,
[8] F. B. Jensen, W. A. Kuperman and M. B. Porter, Computational Ocean Acoustics, AIP Press, New York,
1994.
[9] I. F. Akyildiz, D. Pompili and T. Melodia. Underwater acoustic sensor networks: Research challenges, Ad
Hoc Networks, no.3, pp.257-279, 2005.
[10] D. B. Kilfoyle, and A. B. Baggeroer, “The state of the art in underwater acoustic telemetry”, IEEE Journal
of Oceanic Engineering, vol. 25, no.1, pp. 4–27, Jan. 2000.
[11] Ian F. Akyildiz, Dario Pompili, Tommaso Melodia, “Challenges for Efficient Communication Underwater
Acoustic Sensor Networks” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, Volume 6, pp.114-119 , July 2004.
[12] http://www.radioelectronics.com/info/cellulartelecomms/cellular_concepts/multiple_access_schemes.php
[13] T. S. Rappaport, “Wireless Communications.” Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1996.
[14] K. Pahlavan and A. H. Levesque, Wireless Information Networks, New York: Wiley, 1995.
5/20/2019
Contd..
[15] D. D. Falconer, F. Adachi, and B. Gudmundson, “Time division multiple access methods for
wireless personal communications,” IEEE Commun. Mag., pp. 33–36, Jan. 1995.
72
[16] R. Kohno, R. Meidan, and L. B. Milstein, “Spread spectrum methods for wireless
communications,” IEEE Commun. Mag., pp. 33–36, Jan. 1995.
[17] Ajit Singh et. al,“Design of IDMA Scheme Using LDPC Coding ”, VSRD International
Journal of Electrical, Electronics & Comm. Engg. Vol. 1 (7), 2011.
[20]. Basharat, A; Khokhar, I.A.; Murtaza, S; “CDMA versus IDMA for subscriber cell density,”
in Proc. of International Conference on Innovations in Information Technology, pp. 520-524,
2008.
[21]. Katsutoshi Kusume, Gerhard Bauch, Wolfgang Utschick, “IDMA vs. CDMA: Detectors,
Performance and Complexity”, in Proc. of IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference,
GLOBECOM 2009, pp. 1-8, 2009.
5/20/2019
Contd..
[22]. A. Basharat, I. A. Khokhar, S. Murtaza, “Security Analysis of Interleave- Division Multiple Access: Next
Generation Competitor,” in Proc. of the Fourth73 International Conference on Wireless and Mobile
Communications, ICWMC '08, pp. 274-277, 2008.
[23]. Li Ping, L. Liu, K. Y. Wu, and W. K. Leung, “A unified approach to multi-use detection and space time
coding with low complexity and nearly optimal performance,” in Proc. of 40th Allerton Conference, Allerton
House, USA, pp. 170–179, Oct. 2002.
[24]. Xingzhong Xiong, Jianhao Hu, Xiang Ling, “IDMA/CDMA: A Hybrid Multiple Access Scheme,” in Proc.
of International Conference on MultiMedia and Information Technology, MMIT '08. , pp. 512-514, 2008.
[25].http://www.radioelectronics.com/info/cellulartelecomms/cellular_concepts/multiple_access_schemes.php
[26] Hyung G. Myung, Junsung Lim, and David J. Goodman, “Single Carrier FDMA for Uplink Wireless
Transmission.” IEEE Vehicular Technology, Sept 2006.
[27] Hyung G. Myung ,“introduction to Single Carrier FDMA”, in Proc. of 15th European Signal Processing
Conference (EUSIPCO 2007), Poznan, Poland, September 3-7, 2007, copyright by EURASIP.
[28] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PH
[29] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salinity
5/20/2019
74
5/20/2019