Criteria Yes No

1. Prioritizing altruism (helping selflessly, willing to sacrifice) √

2. Guaranteeing the basic values of human dignity √
3. Looking at the patient / family and something not to the √
advantage of the doctor

4. Trying to make the benefits more than the adverse effect. √

5. Responsible √
6. Ensure a good minimum human life √
7. Restriction Goal-Based √
8. Maximizing the satisfaction of happiness / patient preferences √
9. Minimize adverse consequences. √
10. Obligation to help emergency patients √

11. Respect the patient's rights as a whole √

12. Do not withdraw honoraria beyond appropriateness √

13. Maximizing the highest satisfaction overall √

14. Develop the profession continuously √

15. Providing nutritious yet inexpensive medicine √

16. Applying the Golden Rule Principle √

No Criteria Yes No

1 Helping emergency patients √

2 The conditions for describing these criteria are:

• The patient is in a dangerous condition. √
• Doctors are able to prevent harm or loss.
• The medical action proved effective
• Benefits for patients> doctor's loss (only experiencing minimal risk).

3 Treat injured patients. √

4 Do not kill patients (do not do euthanasia) √
5 Not insulting √
6 Do not view patients as objects 
7 Treating disproportionately √

8 Do not prevent patients dangerously √

9 Avoid misrepresentation of patients √

10 Do not endanger the patient's life due to negligence √

11 Does not give life spirit √

12 Does not protect patients from attacks √

13 Do not do white collar in the health field √

No Kriteria Yes No

1 Respecting the right to self-determination, respecting √

the dignity of patients.

2 Do not intervene in patients in making decisions (under √

elective conditions)

3 Be honest √
4 Appreciate privacy. √
5 Keep personal secrets √
6 Appreciate patient rationality. √
7 Carry out informed consent √
8 Allowing adult patients and competent to make their own √
decisions.

9 Do not intervene or obstruct patient autonomy. √

10 Prevent other parties from intervening in patients and making √

decisions, including, including the patient's own family.

11 Patiently waiting for the decision to be taken by the patient in a √

non-emergency case.

12 Don't lie to the patient even for the benefit of the patient. √

13 Maintain relationship (contract) √

No Kriteria Yes No

1 Give everything universally √

2 Take the last portion of the dividing process he has done. √

3 Giving equal opportunities to individuals in the same position. √

4 Respecting patients' health rights (affordability, equality, accessibility, √

availability, quality)

5 Appreciate the legal rights of patients. √

6 Respect the rights of others √

7 Maintain vulnerable groups (the most disadvantaged) √

8 Do not abuse. √
9 Wise in macro allocations. √

10 Provide a contribution that is relatively the same as the patient's needs √

11 Request patient participation according to ability. √

12 The obligation to distribute profits and losses (costs, expenses, sanctions) fairly √

13 Return rights to the owner at the right time and competent. √

14 Does not give heavy burden unevenly without valid reasons √

15 Respect the rights of the population who are equally susceptible to diseases / √
health problems.

16 Does not distinguish patient services on the basis of SARA, social status etc. √
 Ethical Dilemma

Beneficience

Prima facie Autonomy

Medical Indications
• A woman 55 years old has breast
cancer (kronnis)
• patients recover from breast cancer
with chemotherapy
• if the patient is not chemotherapy,
the cancer will metastasize and the
patient dies
Quality of Life
• the patient can be saved if she
approves chemotherapy
Client Preferences
• the patient can determine his
opinion
• the doctor has educated the
patient but the patient refused
Contextual Features
• socioeconomic patients are
sufficient. But the patient refused
chemotherapy because she did not
want to charge her son.
Extraordinary