Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Intro Phil Session 3 Arguments

    Uploaded by

    Rowena Cayog
    29 views26 pages
    This document outlines an introduction to philosophy session on doing philosophy through arguments. It defines what an argument is and discusses the components of valid, sound, and unsound arguments. Examples of different types of arguments are provided to demonstrate valid and invalid structures. Necessary and sufficient conditions for arguments are also defined. The session aims to explain the key elements of constructing and evaluating philosophical arguments.

    Original Description:

    Philo

    Original Title

    intro+phil+session+3+arguments

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document outlines an introduction to philosophy session on doing philosophy through arguments. It defines what an argument is and discusses the components of valid, sound, and unsound arguments. Examples of different types of arguments are provided to demonstrate valid and invalid structures. Necessary and sufficient conditions for arguments are also defined. The session aims to explain the key elements of constructing and evaluating philosophical arguments.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
    29 views26 pages

    Intro Phil Session 3 Arguments

    Uploaded by

    Rowena Cayog
    This document outlines an introduction to philosophy session on doing philosophy through arguments. It defines what an argument is and discusses the components of valid, sound, and unsound arguments. Examples of different types of arguments are provided to demonstrate valid and invalid structures. Necessary and sufficient conditions for arguments are also defined. The session aims to explain the key elements of constructing and evaluating philosophical arguments.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
    of 26

    Introduction to Philosophy

    Session 3
    Doing Philosophy: Arguments

    ar·gu·ment
    noun
    1.1.
    an exchange of diverging or opposite views, typically a heated or angry one.
    "I've had an argument with my father"
    2.2.
    a reason or set of reasons given with the aim of persuading others that an action or
    idea is right or wrong.
    "there is a strong argument for submitting a formal appeal"
    Introduction to Philosophy
    Session 3
    Doing Philosophy: Arguments

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cum3k-
    Wglfw&list=PLtKNX4SfKpzX_bhh4LOEWEGy3pk
    LmFDmk&index=1
    Introduction to Philosophy
    Session 3
    Doing Philosophy: Arguments

    VALID ARGUMENT
    If premises are true, conclusion is true
    Introduction to Philosophy
    Session 3
    Doing Philosophy: Arguments

    Premise 1:
    I D
    You are either hungry or tired
    L
    A
    Premise 2: You are not hungry

    V
    Conclusion: You are tired
    Introduction to Philosophy
    Session 3
    Doing Philosophy: Arguments

    Premise 1:
    I D
    All men are mortal
    L
    A
    Premise 2: Socrates is a man

    V
    Conclusion: Socrates is mortal
    Introduction to Philosophy
    Session 3
    Doing Philosophy: Arguments

    Premise 1:
    I D
    All students are smart
    L
    A
    Premise 2: Jennifer is a student

    V
    Conclusion: Jennifer is smart
    Introduction to Philosophy
    Session 3
    Doing Philosophy: Arguments

    Premise 1:
    LI D
    Some students are smart
    Premise 2:
    VA
    Jennifer is a student

    IN
    Conclusion: Jennifer is smart
    Introduction to Philosophy
    Session 3
    Doing Philosophy: Arguments

    Premise 1:
    LI D
    Jennifer is a student
    Premise 2:
    VA
    Jennifer is smart

    IN
    Conclusion: All students are smart
    Introduction to Philosophy
    Session 3
    Doing Philosophy: Arguments

    Premise 1: Peter is made of oatmeal


    Premise 2:
    LI D
    Oatmeal is an animal

    VA
    Premise 3: All animals are yellow
    Premise 4: Yellow is the same as green
    Conclusion: Peter is green
    Introduction to Philosophy
    Session 3
    Doing Philosophy: Arguments

    Premise 1: A is made of B
    Premise 2: B is C
    LI D
    VA
    Premise 3: All C is f
    Premise 4: f is the same as g
    Conclusion: A is g
    Introduction to Philosophy
    Session 3
    Doing Philosophy: Arguments

    Premise 1:
    LI D
    7 is more than 2
    Premise 2:
    VA
    McDonalds sells burgers

    IN
    Conclusion: Brooklyn is part of New York City
    Introduction to Philosophy
    Session 3
    Doing Philosophy: Arguments

    Premise 1:
    LI D
    A is more than B
    Premise 2:
    VA
    C sells D

    IN
    Conclusion: E is part of F
    Introduction to Philosophy
    Session 3
    Doing Philosophy: Arguments

    SOUND ARGUMENT
    A valid argument with true premises
    Introduction to Philosophy
    Session 3
    Doing Philosophy: Arguments

    D
    Premise 1:
    O UN
    You are either hungry or tired
    Premise 2:
    T S
    You are not hungry

    NO
    Conclusion: You are tired
    Introduction to Philosophy
    Session 3
    Doing Philosophy: Arguments

    Premise 1:
    ND
    All men are mortal
    Premise 2:
    U
    Socrates is a man

    SO
    Conclusion: Socrates is mortal
    Introduction to Philosophy
    Session 3
    Doing Philosophy: Arguments

    ND
    Premise 1:
    U
    All students are smart
    O
    Premise 2:

    T SJennifer is a student

    O
    Conclusion: Jennifer is smart

    N
    Introduction to Philosophy
    Session 3
    Doing Philosophy: Arguments

    ND
    Premise 1:
    U
    Some students are smart
    O
    Premise 2:

    T S
    Jennifer is a student

    O
    Conclusion: Jennifer is smart
    N
    Introduction to Philosophy
    Session 3
    Doing Philosophy: Arguments

    ND
    Premise 1:
    U
    Jennifer is a student
    O
    Premise 2:

    T S
    Jennifer is smart

    O
    Conclusion: All students are smart
    N
    Introduction to Philosophy
    Session 3
    Doing Philosophy: Arguments

    Premise 1:
    ND
    Peter is made of oatmeal
    Premise 2:
    O U
    Oatmeal is an animal
    Premise 3:
    T S All animals are yellow

    NO
    Premise 4: Yellow is the same as green
    Conclusion: Peter is green
    Introduction to Philosophy
    Session 3
    Doing Philosophy: Arguments

    Premise 1: A is made of B

    ?
    Premise 2: B is C
    Premise 3: All C is f
    Premise 4: f is the same as g
    Conclusion: A is g
    Introduction to Philosophy
    Session 3
    Doing Philosophy: Arguments

    ND
    Premise 1:
    U
    7 is more than 2
    O
    Premise 2:

    T S
    McDonalds sells burgers

    O
    Conclusion: Brooklyn is part of New York City
    N
    Introduction to Philosophy
    Session 3
    Doing Philosophy: Arguments

    ND
    Premise 1: A is more than B
    O U
    Premise 2:

    T S
    C sells D

    O
    Conclusion: E is part of F
    N
    Introduction to Philosophy
    Session 3
    Doing Philosophy: Arguments
    Introduction to Philosophy
    Session 3
    Doing Philosophy: Arguments
    Introduction to Philosophy
    Session 3
    Doing Philosophy: Arguments

    NECESSARY CONDITION
    Q is true only if P is true

    SUFFICIENT CONDITION
    If R is true, then S is true
    Introduction to Philosophy
    Session 3
    Doing Philosophy: Arguments

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?
    v=9uOF3AZI_Gc&list=PLtKNX4SfKpzX_bhh4LOEWEGy3pkLmFDmk&index=8

    You might also like