Week Three: Competition and Welfare

You might also like

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 108

Week Three

Competition and Welfare


PLAN
• Perfect Competition Model
• Monopoly model
• Monopolistic Competition
• Monopoly power and Welfare
• Structure-conduct-performance
• Concentration and its determinants
• Measuring market power
• Oligopoly
All firms are assumed to maximise profit.

They must operate on their cost curves, i.e. minimise


costs for any level of output.

But they also need to choose the right level of output.


Profit = Revenue – Total Cost

Price x Quantity

A pure competitor is a price taker, so the


market price is given.
(‘Given’ means constant with respect to
output, not constant over time.)
Total Cost
Revenue
$

At what level of
output is profit
maximised?

Q* Quantity
Total Cost
Revenue
$

Slope = MC Profit is maximised


where the two lines
are parallel…

…where their slopes


are equal.
Slope = price

Q* Quantity
Price, Marginal, and Average Costs

200

180

160 Profit-maximising
output level in the
140 short run, where
P=MC
120
Price
?VC/?Q
$

100
AVC
ATC
80

60

40

20

0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
Output
Price, Marginal, and Average Costs

200

180

160 Shut-down price,


where revenue
140
doesn't even cover
120
variable cost
Price
?VC/?Q
$

100
AVC
ATC
80

60

40

20

0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
Output
Price, Marginal, and Average Costs

200

180

160
Break-even price,
140
where revenue just
covers total costs
120
Price
?VC/?Q
$

100
AVC
ATC
80

60

40

20

0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
Output
The pure competitor’s decision rule:
In the short run, produce the level of output at which
price equals marginal cost…

If price is below average total cost but above average


variable cost, continue to follow the above rule in the
short run, but cease production in the long run.

If price is below average variable cost, cease


production now.
Price, Marginal, and Average Costs
The part of the marginal
200
cost curve above the
180
average variable cost
160 curve is the firm’s ‘supply
140 curve’.
120
?VC/?Q
$

100 AVC
ATC
80

60

40

20

0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
Output
A firm’s
MC MC curve

$95

21 Quantity
A firm’s
MC supply
curve

$95

21 Quantity
Price
per kg Supply
Curves for two
12 firms
9

36 5 8
Quantity
Price
per kg
12

9
Short run
Market Supply
Schedule

3 5 6 8 14
Quantity
Ave. But in the long run, competition forces
Cost price down to minimum AC...
($) MC
AC

Output
Q*
Long run supply schedule in standard
Price case industry (firms have identical,
rising AC schedules)
($)

AC*

Output
The industry initially in equilibrium,
Price supplying Q0…
($)

AC*

Do
Output
Q0
Demand increases...
Price

($)

AC*

D0
D0
Output
Q0
Price rises to P’. Quantity
Price supplied increases as existing
firms move up their MC curves
($)

P'
AC*

D0
D0
Output
Q0 Q'
But the higher price attracts
Price new entrants willing to supply
at AC* and price falls....
($)

P'
AC*

D1
Do
Output
Q0 Q'
...until long run equilibrium is
Price restored with a larger number
of firms each supplying Q*
($)

AC*

D1
D0
Output
Q0 Q1
FIRM INDUSTRY

Price Price
S
MC

Pe Pe

Firm Q Industry Q
Firm's Industry's
Price Demand Price Demand
Schedule Schedule S
MC

Pe D Pe

Quantity Quantity
PLAN
• Perfect Competition Model
• Monopoly model
• Monopolistic Competition
• Monopoly power and Welfare
• Structure-conduct-performance
• Concentration and its determinants
• Measuring market power
• Oligopoly
Price
Firm and Industry
Demand Schedule

D
Quantity

A monopoly is the sole producer in a


Quantity
market. The firm is the industry.
Price monopoly can choose either its
price or the quantity it wants to
sell…in choosing one it
automatically chooses the other.

Quantity
Price If the Monopoly sets price at P0 it
will sell Q0.

If it decides to sell Q0, the market


.will set the price at P0

P0

Quantity
Q0
The monopoly's output decision: algebraic approach

The monopoly's Problem: Choose Q to max. П(Q)

  TR  TC
  P(Q)Q  TC (Q)

  (a  bQ)Q  FC  cQ

Linear Constant
demand variable
schedule cost
The monopoly's output decision: algebraic approach

The monopoly's Problem: Choose Q to max. П(Q)

  (a  bQ)Q  FC  cQ

  aQ  bQ  FC  cQ
2

To maximise the function with respect to Q:


d
 a  2bQ  c  0
dQ
Marginal a  2bQ  c Marginal
Revenue Cost
The monopoly's output decision: algebraic approach

The monopoly's Problem: Choose Q to max. П(Q)

a  2bQ  c

2bQ  a  c

ac
The profit-
maximising
level of
Q 
output
2b
The monopoly's output decision: numerical example

The monopoly's Problem: Choose Q to max. П(Q)

  TR  TC
  P(Q)Q  TC (Q)

  (100  2Q)Q  500  20Q

Linear Cost Function:


demand TC =500+20Q
schedule:
P=100-2Q
The monopoly's output decision: algebraic approach

The monopoly's Problem: Choose Q to max. П(Q)

  (100  2Q)Q  500  20Q

  100Q  2Q  500  20Q


2

To maximise the function with respect to Q:


d
 100  4Q  20  0
dQ
Marginal 100  4Q  20 Marginal
Revenue Cost
The monopoly's output decision: algebraic approach

The monopoly's Problem: Choose Q to max. П(Q)

100  4Q  20

4Q  80
The profit-
maximising
level of
Q  20
output
Price

100

Slope = -2

Quantity
50
Total Revenue: TR = 100Q - 2Q2

1250

Quantity
0 25
Total Revenue: TR = 100Q - 2Q2

TC = 500 + 20Q

500

Quantity
0 ? 50
Total Revenue: TR = 100Q - 2Q2

TC = 500 + 20Q

500

Quantity
0 20 50
P = 100 - 2Q
Price

100

80

800

Quantity
10 50
P = 100 - 2Q
Price

100

80
78

858

Quantity
10 11 50
P = 100 - 2Q
Price
858 - 800 = 58
100

80 Marginal Revenue
78

858

Quantity
10 11 50
P = 100 - 2Q
Price 858 - 800 = 58

100
Revenue lost by reducing the
80 20 price on the first ten units.
78

78 Revenue gained from sale


of one extra unit at $78

Quantity
10 11 50
Quantity Price Revenue M.R.
0 100 0
1 98 98 98 MR falls
2 96 192 94 twice as fast
3 94 282 90 as price
. . . .
10 80 800
11 78 858 58
. . . .
24 52 1248
25 50 1250 2 MR
26 48 1248 -2 becomes
. . . negative at
the midpoint
P = 100 - 2Q TR = 100Q - 2Q2
Price
MR = 100 - 4Q
100

Quantity
50
P = 100 - 2Q
Price

100 MR = 100 - 4Q

Marginal Revenue Schedule


50
1250
Quantity
25 50
P = 100 - 2Q
Price
MR = 100 - 4Q
100

1250

Quantity
25 50
P = 100 - 2Q
Price
MR = 100 - 4Q
100

20 MC

Quantity
? 25 50
P = 100 - 2Q
Price

100 To maximize profit, the


monopoly sets price at…
?

20 MC

Quantity
20 25 50
P = 100 - 2Q
Price

100
The monopoly sets
price at $60.
60

Profit
20 MC

Quantity
20 25 50
P = 100 - 2Q
Price

100

60

Profit
20 MC

Quantity
20 25 50
PLAN
• Perfect Competition Model
• Monopoly model
• Monopolistic Competition
• Monopoly power and Welfare
• Structure-conduct-performance
• Concentration and its determinants
• Measuring market power
• Oligopoly
Pure Monopoly
Competition
Monopolistic
Competition
Pure Monopolistic Monopoly
Competition Competition
Number of Many Many One
Sellers
Homogeneous Yes No NA
Product?
Barriers to No No Yes
entry?
Downward-sloping demand curve
Price of reflects a degree of market
a meal power.
AC
PS* MC

ACS

MR

Q S* Number of meals
Price of
a meal

AC
PS* MC
Profit
ACS

MR

Q S* Number of meals
Price of
a meal

AC
MC
PS*

ACS

MR

Q S* Number of meals
Price of
a meal

AC
MC
PS*
Profit
ACS

MR

Q S* Number of meals
Long-run equilibrium
Price of
a meal All firms earning zero profits

AC
MC

PL*= AC

MR
QL* Number of meals
$

AC

MC
AVC
P3

P2
P1

10 20 30 40 Output
$

AC

MC
AVC

P1

P2

10 20 30 40 Output
PLAN
• Perfect Competition Model
• Monopoly model
• Monopolistic Competition
• Monopoly power and Welfare
• Structure-conduct-performance
• Concentration and its determinants
• Measuring market power
• Oligopoly
I would be prepared to pay $300 for a plane ticket
to Melbourne

Someone offers to sell me a ticket for $200.


I am paying $200 for something that I value at
$ 300. Thus I obtain a 'profit' (surplus) of $100 from
the transaction.
Consumer Surplus:

the difference between the maximum


price that customers would pay
(represented by the demand schedule)
and the price they actually pay.
Price of Sydney Melbourne ticket is = $ 200

Customer Reservation Consumer


Price Surplus

1 400 200

2 300 100

3 200 0

4 100 0
Price of
Plane
Ticket DEMAND SCHEDULE

400

300

200

100

1 2 3 4
Price of
Plane
Ticket CONSUMER SURPLUS

400

300

200 Price
100

1 2 3 4
Price Consumer Surplus: area between
demand curve and price line

Po

Demand

Qo
Price Increase in consumer surplus when
price changes from Po to P1

Po
P1

Demand

Qo Q1
Price
Area A: Income redistributed from
producers to consumers

Po
A B
P1

Demand

Qo Q1
Price
Area A: Income redistributed from
producers to consumers

Area B: surplus of new


consumers (who couldn't
Po afford to buy at Po)
A B
P1

Demand

Qo Q1
I would be prepared to knit and sell a woollen
sweater for $ 200.

Someone offers me $ 300 to knit a sweater.

I am getting $ 300 for something that I value at


$ 200. Thus I obtain a profit (surplus) of $ 100 from
the transaction.

PRODUCER SURPLUS: The difference between


what a producer would be prepared to accept and
what they actually get for a good.
PERSON COST OF PROD. SURPLUS
JUMPER IF PRICE = 300
Alfonso 400 0
Anastasia 300 0
Vladimir 200 100
Don 100 200

TOTAL 300
Price of
Woollen
Sweater SUPPLY SCHEDULE

400

300

200

100

1 2 3 4
Price of
Woollen
PRODUCERS’ SURPLUS
Sweater

400

300 Price

200

100

1 2 3 4
Price Producer Surplus: area between
supply curve and price line
Supply

Po

Qo
A producer will supply quantity Q if:
Revenue > Variable Cost

Therefore:
Producer’s surplus = Revenue - Variable Cost

Recall that:
Profit = Revenue - Variable Cost – Fixed Cost

Therefore:
Producer’s Surplus = Profit + Fixed Cost
Price Total Surplus or W elfare: consumer
surplus plus producer surplus
Supply

Po

Demand

Qo
Price Note that when P = MC, total
surplus is maximized.
Supply

Po

Demand

Qo
Price Suppose the Govt imposes a
price ceiling of Pc.....
Supply

Po
Pc
Demand

Qo
Price ...leading producers to reduce
output to Qc...

Supply

Po
Pc
Demand

Qc Qo
Price New Consumer
Surplus
Supply

Po
Pc
Demand

New Producer
SurplusQc Qo
P = 100 - 2Q
Price

100
Consumer
surplus
60

Profit
20 MC

Quantity
20 25 50
P = 100 - 2Q
Price
Consumer surplus
100 transferred to producer

60 Lost consumer surplus


(deadweight welfare loss)
Profit
20 MC

Quantity
20 25 40 50
PLAN
• Perfect Competition Model
• Monopoly model
• Monopolistic Competition
• Monopoly power and Welfare
• Structure-conduct-performance
• Concentration and its determinants
• Measuring market power
• Oligopoly
Structure Conduct Performance

Whether the How it Whether the market


market is behaves, in produces an
competitive, particular efficient outcome,
monopoly, how firms set in terms of profits or
oligopoly etc. their prices social welfare.

How How do firms Can a person obtain


concentrated use their the good, who wants
is the ‘market it enough to pay for
industry? power’? the cost of
production?
Downward-sloping demand curve
Price of reflects a degree of market
a meal power.

P* MC

Why market
DWL power is a
MC problem

How we measure Q* Number of meals


market power
The questions:

1.If structure depends mostly on concentration, how


do we measure concentration?

2. What determines concentration?

3. If conduct refers to the exercise of market power,


how do we measure market power?

4. What gives a firm market power? How much does it


really depend on concentration, as measured by the
concentration ratio? What other factors cause some
firms to have more market power than others?
PLAN
• Perfect Competition Model
• Monopoly model
• Monopolistic Competition
• Monopoly power and Welfare
• Structure-conduct-performance
• Concentration and its determinants
• Measuring market power
• Oligopoly
Four-firm concentration ratio:

the share of the four largest firms in total sales.

FIRM Sales ($
billions)
A 42 42  27  16  12
B 27 114
C 16
D 12  0.76
E 8
F 6
G 3
Total 114
Which of these industries is the most concentrated?

Case
Firm 1 2 3 Herfindahl-
A 25 70 100 Hirschmann
Index
B 25 10 0
C 25 10 0
Sales of Firm A
D 25 10 0 wA 
Total sales
Total 100 100 100
HHI 625 4900 10000


HHI  10,000  wA  wB  wC  wD
2 2 2 2

What determines the concentration of an industry?

If it’s caused by barriers to entry, then we need to consider


the specifics: natural advantages, legally conferred
advantages, secrets.

If there are no barriers to entry, then (as illustrated in the


‘firm numbers’ spreadsheet), it depends on fixed costs.

For any given level of fixed costs we can speak of an


‘equilibrium concentration’, i.e. the degree of concentration
that forces profits down to zero.
Marginal and Average Cost

200.0

180.0

160.0

140.0
Marginal Cost, Average Cost

120.0

100.0

80.0
C
60.0

40.0
B
A
20.0

0.0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Output
Cost Function

2500

2000

1500
Cost

1000 C

B
500 A

0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
Output
Short run cost curves for many levels of fixed capital
Total Cost

Output
Short run cost curves for many levels of fixed capital
Total Cost

Envelope of the
short-run curves

In the long-run, the firm can vary all


factors of production to minimise the cost
of producing its chosen output level.

Output
Hence, this is a long-run total cost curve.
Total Cost

Envelope of the
short-run curves

In the long-run, the firm can vary all


factors of production to minimise the cost
of producing its chosen output level.

Output
Average
Total Cost

Output
Short run average cost curves for many levels of fixed capital
Average
Total Cost

Envelope of the
short-run curves

Output
Hence, this is a long-run
Average average total cost curve.
Cost

Falling Costs Rising Costs


(Economies of (Diseconomies
Scale) of Scale)

MES Output
Minimum Efficient Scale
Cost
structure

Concentration

Size of the
market
How many firms
can supply Dm at
Average min. average cost?
Cost
Market Demand

Minimum
Average
Cost

Dm
Output
If MES is very high, the
Average industry is a natural monopoly.
Cost
Market Demand

Minimum
Average
Cost

Dm
Output
If MES is very low, the market
has room for many firms.
Average Market Demand
Cost

Firms are a price-takers

Minimum
Average
Cost

Dm
Output
PLAN
• Perfect Competition Model
• Monopoly model
• Monopolistic Competition
• Monopoly power and Welfare
• Structure-conduct-performance
• Concentration and its determinants
• Measuring market power
• Oligopoly
Lerner Index

P  MC
P

Suppose Marginal Cost = 30, Price = 40

P  MC 60  40  33%

MC 60
 1
MR  P1   Relation of MR, price and elasticity
 
 1
MC  P1   Profit-maximisation
  assumption: MR  MC
MC  1 
 1  
P  
MC  1
1  1  1  
P  
P  MC 1
 Lerner Index
P 
P  MC 1

P 
P  MC
  0 No markup
MC

P  MC
 1 1 100% markup
MC

P  MC Huge markup!
 0 
MC
PLAN
• Perfect Competition Model
• Monopoly model
• Monopolistic Competition
• Monopoly power and Welfare
• Structure-conduct-performance
• Concentration and its determinants
• Measuring market power
• Oligopoly

You might also like