COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

OF INTERCONNECTION
NETWORKS
Project Guide: Ms. Prajakta Papalkar

Students name:
Ketan Mharse 15ET1052
Shubham Khedekar 15ET1110
Mahesh Patil 15ET1111
Shlok Pathare 15ET1079
 INTRODUCTION

• This project is the comparison between the output of

mesh and z-mesh with respect to parameters such as
latency and throughput.
• Z-mesh topology is similar to mesh ,the difference is it
has diagonal links.
• It is already a proposed topology.
 Literature survey
Types of Topologies

1.Mesh Topology:
It is simplest topology.

2.Torus Topology:
It is similar to mesh.

End nodes of columns

and End nodes of rows
are connected.
3.Tree Topology:
Irregular network topology
Consist of one main node and
Further divided into branches
4.Butterfly Topology:
Divided into Unidirectional
and bidirectional topology

Unidirectional:
Input and output are on
opposite side

Bidirectional:
Input and output are on
same side
5.Star Topology:
All cores are connected to central
router
Z-MESH

This is already proposed z-

mesh topology.
Having digonal paths in
south-west direction
Less hops required.
Rate of infomation transfer is
fast.
The z-mesh which we are going to implement is given
below,
NoC Architecture
ADVANTAGES:
Low power consumption.

Latency is less hence throughput is good.

Less hops are required.

DISADVANTAGES:

 Slightly costlier than mesh.

 More link complexity than original mesh.