Eminent domain, also called expropriation, allows the government to take private property for public use as long as just compensation is provided. The government entities that can exercise eminent domain include Congress, the President, local governments, and certain public corporations. For local governments to take property, they must pass an ordinance declaring the taking is for public use and offer compensation to the private owner. Eminent domain differs from necessity in that it allows the government to take property for public, not private, use and requires compensation, while necessity does not.
Eminent domain, also called expropriation, allows the government to take private property for public use as long as just compensation is provided. The government entities that can exercise eminent domain include Congress, the President, local governments, and certain public corporations. For local governments to take property, they must pass an ordinance declaring the taking is for public use and offer compensation to the private owner. Eminent domain differs from necessity in that it allows the government to take property for public, not private, use and requires compensation, while necessity does not.
Eminent domain, also called expropriation, allows the government to take private property for public use as long as just compensation is provided. The government entities that can exercise eminent domain include Congress, the President, local governments, and certain public corporations. For local governments to take property, they must pass an ordinance declaring the taking is for public use and offer compensation to the private owner. Eminent domain differs from necessity in that it allows the government to take property for public, not private, use and requires compensation, while necessity does not.
Eminent domain, also called expropriation, allows the government to take private property for public use as long as just compensation is provided. The government entities that can exercise eminent domain include Congress, the President, local governments, and certain public corporations. For local governments to take property, they must pass an ordinance declaring the taking is for public use and offer compensation to the private owner. Eminent domain differs from necessity in that it allows the government to take property for public, not private, use and requires compensation, while necessity does not.
• Also called the power of expropriation, it is described as “the highest and most exact idea of property remaining in the government” that may be acquired for some public purpose through a method “in the nature of a compulsory sale to the State.” Who may exercise it? • The Congress • The President of the Philippines • The various local legislative bodies • Certain Public Corporations (ex: National Housing Authority and water districts) • Quasi-public corporations (ex: Philippine National Railways, PLDT and Meralco) Essential Requisites for the exercise by a local government unit of the power of expropriation • Enactment of an ordinance and not a resolution • It must be for public use • Payment of just compensation • Exercise must be preceded by a valid and definite offer made to the owner, who rejects the same Difference of Eminent Domain from Destruction from Necessity Eminent Domain Destruction from Necessity • Public right • Private right • It arises from law of society and is • Comes under the right of necessity, of vested in the state or its grantee, self –preservation acting under the right and power of • Arises under the laws of society or the state, or benefit of the state, or society itself those under it. • Cannot require the conversion of the property taken to public use, nor is there any need for the payment of just compensation. Requisites of Eminent Domain • Necessity of exercise • Private property • Taking • Public use • Just compensation Necessity of Exercise • When exercised by legislature – political question • When exercised by a delegate – juticiable question Private Property • Anything that can come under the dominion of man is subject to expropriation. • The only exceptions to this rule are money and choses in action. • Property already devoted to public use cannot be expropriated by a delegate acting under a general grant authority. (City of Manila vs Chinese Community) Taking • May include trespass without actual eviction of the owner, material impairment of the value of the property or prevention of the ordinary uses for which the property was intended. Requisites of Taking (Republic vs Castellvi)
• Expropriator must enter a private property
• Entry must be for more than a momentary period • Entry must be under the warrant of legal authority • Entry is for public use • The owner is deprived of enjoying his property Public Use • Any use directly available to the general public as a matter of right and not merely of forbearance or accommodation. • Where expropriated property is converted into a plaza, park, an airfield or highway it thereby becomes res communes. Just Compensation • Full and fair equivalent of the property taken from the private owner by the expropriator. • This is intended to indemnify the owner fully for the loss he has sustained as a result of the expropriation.