Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 134

DISASTER RISK REDUCTION AND

MANAGEMENT
ORIENTATION OF CHIEF TRAINERS AND MTOT OF GRADE
10 ARALING PANLIPUNAN ON CONTEMPORARY ISSUES
1 May 2017; La Fortuna Hotel, Cebu City
ENVIRONMENTAL
ISSUES
ENVIRONMENTAL DEGRADATION
Deforestation
• Of the 27.5 million
hectares forest cover
on the late 1500s,
only 7.2 million
hectares remain.
• Destabilization of
soil cover – erosion;
landslides
Mining
• Second in the world in gold and
third in copper resources.
• Top five in the world for overall
mineral reserves, covering an
estimated nine million hectares.
• Philippine Mining Act of 1995.
• Associated with siltation;
decreasing productivity of
farming and fishing; adverse
health impacts; child labor;
increased vulnerability to flash
floods.
Pollution of air, water, and soil

• Rapid urbanization – 37% of Metro Manila’s


population (3.7 million) live in informal
settlements.
• Poor health; unmitigated flooding.
Marine Environment
• 40% of coral reefs in the
country are in poor condition;
only 2% in good condition
• Threatened by
overexploitation, pollution,
and climate change
• Breeding grounds for fish are
disappearing; undermine
livelihoods of fisher folks;
reduced productivity of
marine environments.
INDOOR AIR POLLUTION

• 54% of population uses solid fuels


(firewood and charcoal) for
cooking, affecting 47 million with
indoor air pollution.
• One of the main drivers of acute
respiratory infection – one of the 3
biggest killers of under 5s in the
country.
• 46% of about 12,700 child deaths
due to acute lower respiratory
infections is attributed to IAP.
OUTDOOR AIR POLLUTION

• Emissions from
transport and waste.
• Clean Air Act of 1999.
• Absence of
sustainable solutions
for traffic and waste
management.
WASTE MANAGEMENT
• Collection rate is highest in the SEA
region – 85%
• RA 9003 – Ecological Solid Waste
• Only 10% of waste in Metro Manila is
composted, reused, or recycled.
• Contamination of water and soil
resulting to air pollution; mosquito
infestations; vector-borne diseases;
floods; pollution of water sources.
• 2.7 million metric tons of plastic waste
annually.
• 3rd largest source of plastic in the ocean
– 0.5 metric tons per year.
• Death of fish, etc.; declining livelihoods
for fisher folks; health problems.
WATER CONTAMINATION
• Due to poor sanitation and wastewater
practices; household and industrial
pollution.
• 50 out of 421 rivers in the country are
considered “biologically dead” – mainly due
to industrial effluent.
• Only 10% of wastewater is treated, leading to
58% contaminated groundwater.
• Around 4,200 deaths are caused by
contaminated drinking water every year.
• Unsatisfactory water quality – Metro Manila;
Southern Tagalog Region; Central Luzon;
Central Visayas.
• Mercury contamination of rivers due to gold
mining.
• Impacts to health.
ENERGY ACCESS
• 2009 – 12.5% of
population do not have
access to electricity.
• Household electrification
is 89%.
• Mindanao – only 70% has
access to electricity.
• 2020 Target – 100%
electrification; 2017 Target
is 90%.
DEVELOPMENT,
ENVIRONMENT, AND
DISASTERS
DEVELOPMENT DISASTERS
LOOK AT AND SHIFT
OUR DEVELOPMENT
PARADIGM – WHAT
DOES SUSTAINABLE
DEVELOPMENT
MEAN FOR US?

ENVIRONMENT
HAZARDS, DISASTERS
AND CLIMATE CHANGE
Hazard
Phenomenon or
situation,
• There is a potential… which has
the
• Slow onset, rapidpotential to cause
onset disruption or damage
to people,
• Natural or human- their
induced property, their
services and their
environment.
NATURAL HAZARDS
 TROPICAL CYCLONES
 FLOODS
 STORM SURGES
 EARTHQUAKES
 TSUNAMIS
 VOLCANIC ERUPTIONS
 LANDSLIDES
 DROUGHT
HUMAN-INDUCED HAZARDS
 FIRE
 MARITIME ACCIDENTS
 AIRCRAFT CRASH
 LAND ACCIDENTS
 INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENTS
 POLLUTION
 CIVIL DISTURBANCE
 TERRORISM
 ARMED CONFLICT
Disaster

The serious disruption of the


functioning of society, causing
widespread human, material or
environmental losses, which exceed
the ability of the affected people to
cope using their own resources.
Climate Change

IPCC DEFINITION UNFCCC DEFINITION


Change in the state of Change in the state of
climate over time due to climate over time due to

• natural processes • human activity, either


• human activity directly or indirectly

Human activity, i.e. activities that release greenhouse


gases; also known as anthropogenic
What’s Wrong?

Dramatic
increase of GHG
emissions and
concentrations
since pre-
industrial times
http://www.koshland-science-museum.org/exhibitgcc/causes02.jsp
IPCC 2007 CONCLUSION
“Warming of the climate system is
unequivocal, as is now evident from
observations of increases in global average
air and ocean temperatures, widespread
melting of snow and ice, and rising global
average sea level”
(WG 1, IPCC 4th Assessment Report)
Disaster Risk

The potential disaster losses, in lives,


health status, livelihoods, assets and
services, which could occur to a
particular community or a society over
some specified future time period.
Vulnerability

The characteristics and


circumstances of a community, system
or asset that make it susceptible to the
damaging effects of a hazard.
Capacity
The combination of all
the strengths,
attributes and
resources available
within a community,
society or organization
that can be used to
achieve agreed goals.
VULNERABILITY - Pacific Ring of Fire
The Ring of Fire is a major area in
the basin of the Pacific Ocean
where a large number of
earthquakes and volcanic
eruptions occur. In a 40,000 km
(25,000 mi) horseshoe shape, it is
associated with a nearly
continuous series of oceanic
trenches, volcanic arcs, and
volcanic belts and/or plate
Photo credit: wikipedia.org movements. It has 452 volcanoes
"Ring of Fire – Pacific Ring of Fire". geography.about.com
(https://www.thoughtco.com/ring-of-fire-1433460).
(more than 75% of the world's
2010-06-14. Retrieved May 1, 2017.
active and dormant volcanoes).
VULNERABILITY - Pacific Typhoon Belt

Photo credit: ucar.edu


World Risk Index Report 2016
9th in 2009
6th in 2010
3rd in 2011
3rd in 2012
3rd in 2013
2nd in 2014
3nd in 2015
3rd in 2016
OTHER DRRM
TERMINOLOGIES
Prevention
The outright avoidance of adverse
impacts of hazards and related
disasters.

Sendai Framework for DRR speaks of


prevention as “prevention of new
risks”
Mitigation
The lessening or limitation of the
adverse impacts of hazards and related
disasters.
• Adverse impacts of hazards often cannot be prevented
fully – use interchangeably with prevention
• Scale or severity can be substantially lessened by
various strategies and actions
• Both structural and non-structural measures
Preparedness

The knowledge and capacities developed


• Requires formal institutional, legal by
governments, professional response
and budgetary support and and
recovery organizations, communities and
capacities
individuals to effectively anticipate, respond
•to, Aims to build capacities needed to
and recover from, the impacts of likely,
efficiently
imminent manage
or current all types
hazard eventsof
or
emergencies
conditions.
Response
Provision of emergency services
• Immediate and short-term needs and
publicbetween
• Division assistance during
response or and
stage
immediately
subsequentafter a disaster
recovery stage isinnot
order
clear-to
save lives, reducecuthealth impacts,
• Response
ensure publicactions,
safetysuch
andas the supply
meet of
the basic
temporary housing and water
subsistence needs of the people supplies,
may extend well into the recovery stage
affected.
Rehabilitation

Actions taken
• Measures thatinensures
the aftermath of disaster
the ability of
to:
affected communities/areas to restore
• Assist victims to repair their
their normal level of functioning by
dwellings
rebuilding livelihood and damaged
• Re-establish essential services
infrastructures and increasing
• Revive key economic and social the
communities'
activities organizational capacity.
Reconstruction
Permanent measures to repair or
replace damaged
dwellings and infrastructure and to set
the economy back on
course.

“build back better”


Recovery
The restoration and improvement
where appropriate, of facilities,
livelihood and living conditions of
disaster-affected communities,
including efforts to reduce disaster risk
factors.
Applies “build back better” principle
Disaster Risk Reduction
The concept and practice of reducing
disaster risks through systematic efforts to
Sendai
analyze andFramework for
manage the causal DRR
factors of
disasters, including through reduced
speaks of DRR as “reducing
exposure to hazards, lessened vulnerability
of peopleexisting
and property,risks”
wise management
of land and the environment, and improved
preparedness for adverse events.
Disaster Risk Management
The systematic process of using administrative
directives, organizations, and operational skills
and capacities to implement strategies, policies
and improved coping capacities in order to
lessen the adverse impacts of hazards and the
possibility of disaster.

DRM is DRR in ACTION


Resilience
The ability of a system, community or society exposed to hazards to
resist, absorb, accommodate and recover from the effects of a
hazard in a timely and efficient manner, including through the
preservation and restoration of its essential basic structures
and functions.

No internationally
agreed definition
INTERNATIONAL AND
NATIONAL FRAMEWORKS
ON DRRM
Core Humanitarian Standards
in Quality & Accountability

Sendai Framework for DRR

United Nations Convention on


the Rights of the Child
(UNCRC)

INEE Minimum Standards in


Education: Preparedness,
Response, Recovery

Comprehensive School safety


Framework (CSSF)
DRRM in Education

Philippine Disaster Risk


Reduction & Management (RA
10121)

Children’s Emergency Relief


and Protection Act
(RA.10821)
INTERNATIONAL & NATIONAL LEGAL
FRAMEWORKS, CONVENTIONS, STANDARDS
Core Humanitarian Standard on Quality
and Accountability

DRRM was
borne from
the
humanitarian
field
UN CONVENTION ON THE RIGHTS OF THE
CHILD – CORE RIGHTS RELATED TO DRRM
• The right to special protection for the
child’s physical, mental and social
development.

• The right to recreational activities and


free education.

• The right to be among the first to receive


relief in all circumstances.

• The right to protection against all forms


of neglect, cruelty and exploitation.
SENDAI FRAMEWORK FOR DRR

187 countries
World Conference on DRR
(WCDRR)
March 18; Sendai, Japan
Successor to the Hyogo
Framework for Action
(HFA)
SENDAI FRAMEWORK FOR DRR
SENDAI FRAMEWORK FOR DRR
DRRM in Education
Sector
What the Sendai Framework says about Education
Incorporation of disaster risk knowledge in formal and non-formal
education, civic education, professional education
and training

Strengthen structural and non-structural disaster risk prevention and


reduction in critical facilities, particularly schools, hospitals

Promote resilience of new and existing critical infrastructures…educational


facilities, hospitals, etc.
Ensure continuity of operations and planning…and provision of basic services in
post disaster
Regular disaster preparedness, response and recovery exercises, including
evacuation drills, etc.
Provide psychosocial support and mental health services for all people in need
COMPREHENSIVE SCHOOL SAFETY FRAMEWORK
COMPREHENSIVE SCHOOL SAFETY FRAMEWORK

3
PILLARS
OBJECTIVES
COMPREHENSIVE SCHOOL SAFETY FRAMEWORK

Protect learners and education workers


from death, injury, and harm in schools

Plan for educational continuity in the


face of all expected hazards and threats

Safeguard education sector investments

Strengthen risk reduction and resilience


through education
INEE MINIMUM STANDARDS FOR EDUCATION:
PREPAREDNESS, RESPONSE, RECOVERY

5 DOMAINS
RA 10121 – PHILIPPINE DRRM ACT OF 2010
RA 10121 strengthens the country’s DRRM system
• From disaster relief and response
approach to DRRM

• Establishment of an
organizational structure through
national and local DRRM councils

• Multi-hazard, multi-sectoral,
inter-agency and community-
based approach
RA 10121 – PHILIPPINE DRRM ACT OF 2010

DRRM
Framework

Source: NDRRMC 2011


RA 10121 recognizes the critical role of Education

• Institutionalize DRRM and CCA mainstreaming into agencies’


policies, processes, with continuing budget appropriation

• DepEd as member of the national and local DRRM councils

• Integration of DRRM into the school curriculum


• Protection of children’s rights before, during and after a disaster
• Comprehensive Emergency Program
- Plan of Action for Prompt Resumption of Educational Services for
Children
DISASTER IMPACTS
DISASTER
IMPACTS
AT A
GLANCE
• Death of 12,899 people; injury
to 138,116 persons
From 2000- • Affected more than 71 million
2012, individuals; rendered 375,000
disasters persons homeless
from natural • Socio-economic damage
hazards estimated at US$3.37 billion,
caused: with annual average damage
of US$251.58 million
Senate Economic Planning Office, 2013;
UNISDR; CNN Philippines, 2016; Philippine Star, 2015
• Total of 222 individuals were
reported dead, 976 injured,
and eight missing
• Affected 3 million people –
more than 300,000 of them Bohol
were displaced Earthquake,
• 73,000 houses were damaged October
• Damaged P2.3 billion worth of 2014
seaports, airports, churches,
and other infrastructures
Senate Economic Planning Office, 2013;
UNISDR; CNN Philippines, 2016; Philippine Star, 2015
• Claimed a staggering 6,300 lives
• Affected 648 other cities and
municipalities in 44 provinces
• It changed the lives of 16 million
individuals, displacing 800,000
families
Typhoon • Damaged a million houses, and left up
to P90 billion worth of damages
Yolanda • As of April 2014, more than a
thousand people remain missing,
based on the latest report by the
National Risk Reduction and
Management Council (NDRRMC)

Senate Economic Planning Office, 2013;


UNISDR; CNN Philippines, 2016; Philippine Star, 2015
Philippines is losing more than
PhP300 billion (2.5% of GDP) from
natural disasters and calamities
every year (Former Finance
Secretary Purisima)

Senate Economic Planning Office, 2013;


UNISDR; CNN Philippines, 2016; Philippine Star, 2015
Impacts of Disasters
 HUMAN TOLL
 Dead, injured and missing
 Families displaced
 Lost livelihood
 DAMAGE and LOSSES
 Productive Sectors
 Social Sectors
 Infrastructure
 Cross Sectoral
 SLOWS ECONOMY
 HAMPERS DELIVERY OF SERVICES
VULNERABILITY OF THE EDUCATION SECTOR

Our
schools and
learners
are highly
exposed to
multiple
hazards
Education suffers severely from disasters
Total schools with reports on damage to infrastructure and other materials
Schools with non-infrastructure damage

Schools
Total schools Schools with Schools with
Tropical Cyclone with Total schools
with infra reported Reported
Name reported with non-infra
damage damaged Damaged
damaged damage
furniture Computers
textbooks

Glenda (Jul 2014) 2,436 ND ND ND ND


Luis & Mario (Sept 45
54 26 32 27
2014)
Ruby (Nov 2014) 1,400 925 1,088 257 1,406
Seniang (Dec 296
176 148 270 62
2014)
Amang (Jan 2015) 156 90 191 35 223
Egay (Mar 2015) 38 0 0 0 0
Falcon (Jun 2015) 7 0 0 0 0
Ineng (Aug 2015) 112 11 7 11 19
Lando (Oct 2015) 555 308 422 213 552
Nona (Dec 2015) 1,206 888 1,070 510 1,281
TOTAL** 5,296 2,164 2,759 1,046 3,383
*ND - No data
**Reflects the total unique schools with reports (multiple reports of schools counted as Since the start of systematic collection of data on damage brought about by
one), totals may not add up disasters through the Rapid Assessment of Damages Report (RADaR) sent via SMS
IMPACTS ON INFRASTRUCTURE
Surigao Typhoons
Tail-End of a Earthquake Ferdie and
The Philippines’ major disasters from July 2016 Cold Front 46 Gener
to February 2017 brought about a total of 9,868 86 13
Habagat
damaged classrooms (totally and partially major
90
damages), across 14 different regions. Among
these damages, 9,646 (97%) were brought by
major tropical cyclones, 176 (2%) were brought
by other weather disturbances (Southwest Typhoons
Monsoon and Tail-End of a Cold Front) and 46 Karen and
(1%) were brought by the Magnitude 6.7 Lawin
earthquake. Typhoon Nina 4,166
5,467
TYPOONS FERDIE
TYPHOON NINA
AND GENER

HABAGAT TAIL-END OF
A COLD FRONT
TYPHOONS KAREN SURIGAO
AND LAWIN EARTHQUAKE
OTHER IMPACTS (NON-INFRASTRUCTURE)

Damaged
Damaged Damaged
NAME OF HAZARD Learning
Non-infrastructure damages, which include Furniture Computers
Materials
items such as furniture (teachers’ and
Typhoons Ferdie and Gener 30 - 12
learners’ desks, chairs and tables), learning
Habagat 678 877 73
materials and computer sets (DepEd
Typhoons Karen and Lawin 4,429 51,036 423
Computerization Program) were accounted as
Typhoon Nina 64,892 398,728 6,013
per the reports of schools heads and the
results of Post-Disaster Needs Assessment. Tail-End of a Cold Front 2,314 37,935 41
Surigao Earthquake 27 31 32
FURNITURE
398,728

LEARNING MATERIALS

COMPUTER SETS

64,892
51,036
37,935
30 0 12 678 877 73 4,429 423 6,013 2,314 41 27 31 32

Typhoons Ferdie Habagat Typhoons Karen Typhoon Nina Tail-End of a Cold Surigao
and Gener and Lawin Front Earthquake
COST OF CLEAN-UP AND TLS

Disaster Clean-up TLS


TY Ferdie 180,000
TY Karen and STY 20,535,000 30,180,000
Lawin
Nina 23,340,000 90,540,000
Surigao Earthquake 555,000
Habagat 540,000
Tail-end of a cold front 240,000 435,000
TOTAL 44,850,000.00 121,695,000.00
COST OF REPAIR

Amount in Source of
Disaster
million Fund
TY Ferdie 13,838,412.00 BEFF (ongoing
repair)
TY Karen and STY 700,545,653.00 NDRRM Fund
Lawin
Nina 842,648,715.56 NDRRM Fund
Ms 6.7 Surigao NDRRM Fund
Earthquake
Tentative Total 1,557,032,780.56
DRRM INITIATIVES
Philippine DRRM Act of 2010 Sendai
RA 10121Framework
for DRR
Climate Change Act of 2009
Paris
RA 9729 Agreement
We are responding to the
directives of President Duterte
to strengthen and enrich 10-Point Agenda
curricular reforms on anti-
illegal drugs, reproductive
health, and disaster
Sustain
preparedness. Developme

FOUNDATIONS
NDRRM Council: 44 Members
Members: 39
Chairperson: Secretary, DND • 14 Depts: DOH, DENR, DA, DepEd,
Vice-Chairpersons: DOE, DOF, DTI, DOTC, DBM, DPWH,
• Sec, DOST – Prevention & DFA, DOJ, DOLE & DOT
Mitigation • 12 gov’t agencies: OES OPAPP,
• Sec, DILG –Preparedness CHED AFP, PNP, OPS, NAPC, PCW,
HUDCC, CCC, PHILHEALTH & OCD
• Sec, DSWD – Disaster
Response • 2 Gov Financial Inst (GSIS & SSS)
• DG, NEDA – Rehab & • 1 Quasi-government agency ( PRC)
Recovery • 5 LGU Leagues
Exec Dir: OCD Administrator • 4 Civil Society Organizations
• 1 Private Sector Organization
DRRM Councils
National Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Council

17 Regional Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Councils

81 Provincial Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Councils

144 City Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Councils

1, 490 Municipal Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Councils

42,026 Barangay Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Committees

References: <http://www.nscb.gov.ph/activestats/psgc/listreg.asp> Last retrieved on 09 February 2014


Sections 5, 9 and 10, RA 10121 (2010)
Organizational Structure of RDRRMC
OCD RD OCD
SECRETARIAT

DILG - DOST DSWD NEDA


PREPAREDNESS MITIGATION RESPONSE RECOVERY

DOH DENR DA DEPED DOE


DOF DTI NTC DBM DPWH

AFP PNP DFA DOJ DOLE

DOT EXEC SEC OPAPP CHED Press Sec

PRC NAPC PCW HUDCC CCO

GSIS SSS ULAP LPP LCP

PHIL
LMP LMB 4 CSO PVT Sect
HEALTH

RA 10121 Sect 5 -
Establishment of DRRMO
LGE

DRRM Officer

Admin & Training Research & Operations &


Officer Planning Officer Warning Officer

Emergency Response Teams &


Accredited Community Volunteers

to set the direction, development, implementation and coordination

RA 10121 Sect 12 - LDRRM Office


OCD ALERT CODE
CLUSTER APPROACH TO EMERGENCY RESPONSE

The aim:
To strengthen system-wide preparedness and technical capacity to respond to humanitarian emergencies
To provide clear leadership and accountability in the main areas of humanitarian response.
National Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Framework
 Executive/Legislative
Agenda
 Damage Assessment
 Environmental & Needs Analysis
Management  Relief Operations
 Comprehensive Land Use  Search & Rescue
Plan Rehab and Ops
 Critical infra  Incident Command
 Financial tools Recovery System
 Hazard identification &  WATSAN / Health
 Vulnerability Analysis
 Capacity Analysis
 Temp. Shelter

Prevention and Response  Public awareness


 Livelihood Mitigation  Public commitment
 Housing  Community actions
 Lifelines  Education &
 Education Training
Preparedness  Early Warning
 Infrastructure  SOP & Plans
 Cross-Sectoral  Advocate ICS

Safer, adaptive and disaster resilient Filipino communities


towards sustainable development
National DRRM Plan

February 7, 2012
DISASTER PREVENTION & MITIGATION

• Development of alarm and


early warning systems
• Nationwide flood forecasting
and monitoring
• Geo-hazard mappings
• Implementation of safety
standards
• Engineering interventions
• Flood control structures
DISASTER PREPAREDNESS

• Contingency planning
• Prepositioning of
equipment
• Enhancement of operation/
coordination centers
• Organizing, training and
equipping responders and
volunteers
• Conduct of training and
drills
DISASTER RESPONSE

• Issuance of advisories
and situation reports
• SRR operations using ICS
• Humanitarian assistance
• Activation of Clusters
• Provision of financial
assistance
• Management of
evacuation centers
DISASTER REHABILITATION & RECOVERY

• Conduct of Post-Disaster
Needs Assessment
• Review of DRRM plans
• Reconstruction and
improvement of houses,
buildings, facilities (“build
back better”
• Resettlement
• Provision of new sources of
livelihood
OTHER DRRM ACTIVITIES

 Awarding of Gawad KALASAG and


BAKAS PARANGAL

 Partnerships with private organizations,


other governments, NGOS, INGOs for
humanitarian assistance

 Formulation of DRRM policies and


protocols
COMMUNITY-BASED DRM
Definition
CBDRM – process of DRM in which
at risk communities are actively
engaged in the identification,
analysis, treatment, monitoring
and evaluation of disaster risks in
order to reduce their
vulnerabilities and enhance
capacities.

People are at the heart of decision-


making and
implementation of DRM activities.
P Selecting the community

R Rapport building and understanding the community

O Participatory disaster risk assessment

C Participatory disaster risk management and planning

E Building and training a community disaster risk


management organization

S Community-managed implementation

S Participatory monitoring and evaluation


PARTICIPATORY DISASTER RISK ASSESSMENT

Participatory process of
determining the nature,
scope and magnitude of
negative effects of
hazards to the
community and its
households within an
anticipated time period
STEP 1

OBJECTIVE:
• Describe hazards in
the community

OUTPUTS:
• List and nature of hazards
• Community hazard map,
community resource map,
digitized map
STEP 2

OBJECTIVE:
• Conduct hazard
mapping

OUTPUT:
• Community hazard
map
STEP 3

OBJECTIVE:
• Describe vulnerabilities and
capacities of community, of
women, men, children, PWDs,
and other at-risk groups

OUTPUT:
• Vulnerability and
capacity analysis
STEP 4

OBJECTIVE:
• Determine disaster
risks

OUTPUT:
• Comprehensive list of
risk faced by the
communities
STEP 5

OBJECTIVE:
• Rank disaster risks

OUTPUT:
• Prioritized list of
risks
STEP 6

OBJECTIVE:
• Decide on acceptable
level of risk

OUTPUT:
• Agreed level of risk for
family and community
safety
STEP 7

OBJECTIVE:
• Decide whether to prevent,
reduce, transfer, or live with
the disaster risk

OUTPUT:
• Agreed strategies
PARTICIPATORY DISASTER RISK MANAGEMENT PLANNING
Barangay Hubangon, Municipality of Mahinog, Camiguin
Planning starts with an aspiration for safety
for the self, the family and the community.
Process where all parties propose concrete
risk reduction measures based on the
following:

• Vision of ideally prepared and resilient


community
• Determining the acceptable level of risk
• Decision as to whether identified risk can
be prevented, reduced, transferred or lived
with
• Their own capacities and other resources
that can be generated outside of their
community
DEPED’S DRRM STRUCTURE
AND INITIATIVES
Elevated to a SERVICE in October 2015
thru DM No. 112, series of 2015
DO NO. 50, SERIES OF 2011
CREATION OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION AND MANAGEMENT OFFICE
CREATED THE DRRM OFFICE
(DepEd Order No. 50, s. 2011)

Elevated into a SERVICE in


October 2015

CENTRAL OFFICE DRRMS

18 REGIONS – 1 DRRM COORDINATOR - PLANTILLA

219 DIVISIONS – 1 DRRM COORDINATOR – PLANTILLA

SCHOOL DRR TEAM – 1 TEAM PER SCHOOL (DESIGNATED PERSONNEL; HEADED BY SCHOOL
HEAD/PRINCIPAL)
DRRMS CHARTER

STATEMENT OF PURPOSE
The Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Service empowers
the DepEd personnel, offices, schools and learners in ensuring
safety and learning continuity, institutionalizes Disaster Risk
Reduction and Management (DRRM), Climate Change
Adaptation (CCA), and Education in Emergencies (EiE), and
strengthens the resilience of basic education in the context of
natural and human-induced hazards.
OUR VISION AND OUTCOMES - DRRMS
Planning Framework VISION/END GOAL – WHAT IT MEANS
FOR OUR LEARNERS AND PERSONNEL!
OUTCOME!
All offices, schools, learners, and personnel
Reduced risks and impacts of
are safe and resilient to risks and impacts of
natural and human-induced
disasters and emergencies arising from
hazards to offices, schools,
natural and human-induced hazards
learners, and personnel

Intermediate
Outcome #1 Intermediate
Learners and personnel are
protected from death, injury, Outcome #2
and harm brought about by Learning continuity is
natural and human-induced ensured in the aftermath
hazards of a disaster

Intermediate Outcome #3
Education investments are
protected from the impacts of
natural and human-induced
hazards
5-Year
2. Establish a package
of interventions which
S G
1. Institutionalize
DRRM, CCA, and EiE are quickly delivered
to ensure learning
T O
across and at all levels
of the Department continuity and R A
resilient building back
in the aftermath of a A L
disaster
T S
E
G
I
C
KEY RESULT AREAS
Risk- Partnerships DRRM Resilience IEC and Learning Monitoring &
informed for Information Education Advocacy for Continuity Evaluation of
Plans, Strengthening System Resilience and DRRMS
Policies and Resilience (DRRMIS) Resilience comprehensive
Standards and Research Interventions school safety
initiatives

1 2 3 4 5 6 7
THE DRRM IN BASIC EDUCATION FRAMEWORK
(DepEd Order No. 37, s. 2015)

RA 10121

COMPREHENSIVE SCHOOL SAFETY FRAMEWORK


Defines DRRM Determines data
roles and and information
needed and
responsibilities of
coordination flow
regional, and
among Central
division offices, Office/DRRMS,
including DRRM regions, divisions
Coordinators at and schools, before,
these levels, and during and after a
schools disaster

DRRM COORDINATION AND INFORMATION MANAGEMENT


PROTOCOL (DepEd Order No. 21, s. 2015)
• Enables quick
reporting of
damages from
schools and
interventions from
DepEd Central
Office

• An app is being
developed to
enhance reporting

RAPID ASSESSMENT OF DAMAGES REPORT (RADAR) – (DEPED ORDER


NO. 21, S. 2015)
Department Title
Order
DO 23, s. 2015 Student-Led School Watching and Hazard Mapping (need to integrate
DRRM Plan in SIP)
DO 27, s. 2015 Promoting Family Earthquake Preparedness (school-community link)
DO 43, s. 2012 Guidelines on the Implementation of EO 66 (Prescribing Rules on the
Cancellation or Suspension of Classes and Work in Government Offices
due to Typhoons, Flooding, Other Weather Disturbances, and
Calamities)
DO 48, s. 2012 Quarterly Conduct of the National School-based Earthquake and Fire
Drills
DO 28, s. 2016 Strengthening the Fire Safety and Awareness Program
DO 83, s. 2011 Disaster Preparedness Measures for Schools

Other Issued DRRM Polices and Standards


Risk-
informed
Plans,
Policies and
Standards

SET AND ALIGN DRRM


PLANS AT ALL LEVELS
Planning workshops with
regional and division DRRM
coordinators
Risk-
informed
Plans,
Policies and
Standards

DEVELOP/ENHANCE POLICIES AND STANDARDS


DEVELOPED THE COMPREHENSIVE
SCHOOL SAFETY MONITORING TOOL
TARGETS/
Global Comprehensive School Safety DepEd DRRMS CSS INDICATORS BASELINE PROGRESS PROGRESS PROGRESS
PLANS
(CSS) TARGETS (Based on DepEd’s DRRM Policies and School DRRM Manual) (2016) (2017) (2018) (2019)
(2017-2019)

School has existing policies relating to DRRM in education/school


Legal Frameworks & Policies A.1
safety
A.2.1 Designated School DRRM Focal Person
Organizational arrangements,
Formed School DRRM Team (state if you have tapped the SGC or SPT;
leadership, and coordination for risk A.2.2
state composition of SDRRM Team)
reduction and resilience is
SDRRM Team are knowledgeable and able to execute their tasks in
established by senior management, A.2.3
accordance to role of schools as per DO 21 s 2015
and includes designated focal points
School DRRM Focal Person and School Head and other officials know
responsible at all levels. A.2.4
how to manage information at any phase of the disaster
A comprehensive approach to school Translated national and regional policies into a comprehensive School
A.3.1
safety, is the foundation for DRRM Plan
integrating risk reduction and A.3.2 Integrated DRRM into the School Improvement Plan (SIP)
A.4.1 Regular DRRM activities are supported by school budget
Education in emergencies and/or other funding sources exist and can
Funding is in place to reduce A.4.2
be drawn upon in cases of disasters
education sector risks
Partnerships that can be tapped for support on DRRM, including during
A.4.3
and after disasters, exist
Conducted student-led school watching and hazard mapping (DO 23 s
A.5.1
2015)
Incorporated results of student-led school watching and hazard
Child-centered Risk Assessment is in A.5.2
mapping in the School DRRM Plan and SIP
place at all levels in the education
Incorporated student-led school watching and hazard mapping in the
sector A.5.3
community hazard maps of LGUs provided by DOST
School Planning Team have linked the community hazard maps with
A.5.4
education data to better understand the school’s risk

For finalization
Name of interviewer Division/Region
Name of respondent Designation

DEVELOPED AND Name of school


BEFORE THE HAZARD
School ID Municipality/City

PILOT TESTED
1.1.Did the school receive any hazard advisory on [NAME OF HAZARD] before it made impact in its area?
YES NO If YES, proceed to the next question. If NO, proceed to question 1.2.

1.1.1. From whom and in what form did the school receive the advisory regarding [NAME OF HAZARD] ?

THE Check all that apply.

A From Central Office


Textblast MemoE-mail Radio TelevisionOthers, specify
□ □ □ □ □
PREPAREDNESS,
B From the Region □ □ □ □ □
C From the Division □ □ □ □ □
D From others, specify □ □ □ □ □

RESPONSE, 1.1.2. To whom did the school share the hazard advisory received? Check all that apply.
A No one □
B Teachers □
D Other school/s □
E Family □
G Others, specify

REHABILITATION C Learners □ F Friends □


1.1.3. How often was the advisory given in a day?

AND RECOVERY
A Once a day B 2-3 times a day C 4 or more times a day

1.2.Did the school receive any advisory on pre-emptive and preparedness measures before [NAME OF

MONITORING
HAZARD] made impact in its area?
YES NO If YES, proceed to the next question. If NO, proceed to question 1.3.

1.2.1. In what form did the school receive the advisory on pre-emptive and preparedness measures befor

TOOL NAME OF HAZARD] ? Check all that apply.

A From Central Office


B From the Region
Textblast MemoE-mail Radio TelevisionOthers, specify
□ □ □ □ □
□ □ □ □ □
C From the Division □ □ □ □ □
D From others, specify □ □ □ □ □
Drafted Policies and Standards
•Post Disaster Needs
Assessment (PDNA) -
piloted
•Minimum Coordination
Standards on
Resettlement – piloted
•Twinning System
•Bomb Threat Protocol
DEVELOPED AND DISTRIBUTED THE SCHOOL DRRM MANUAL

IEC and
ADVOCACY
for
RESILIENCE

Developed and
distributed to
regions,
divisions, and
schools
DEVELOPED AND DISSEMINATED MULTI-
HAZARD PREPAREDNESS MEASURES
CONDUCTED DRRM AND CCA MALL EVENT: AWARENESS RAISING ON LA NIÑA AND
OTHER HAZARDS, IN PARTNERSHIP WITH SM AND OTHER PARTNERS

Partnerships
for
Strengthening
Resilience 24 July 2016, SM Masinag
Resource persons: SMART, DOST-PAGASA, CCP, PRC
NGOs, DONORS, UN AGENCIES
NGOs, DONORS, UN AGENCIES
GOVERNMENT AGENCIES
Current
discussions
with NDRRMC
on Risk
Financing
DETERMINED CAPACITY BUILDING REQUIREMENTS FOR
REGIONAL AND DIVISION DRRM COORDINATORS

Resilience
Education

Defined and identified BASIC, MID & ADVANCED


KNOWLEDGE AND SKILLS BASED ON ROLES &
FUNCTIONS OF DRRM COORDINATORS
(Feb 2016)
Supported by UNICEF

Developed 23 DRRM modules of which 18 were pilot tested; 10 modules adapted for school
heads (provided to NEAP)
IDENTIFIED CAPACITY BUILDING NEEDS OF
DRRM COORDINATORS

To guide DRRMS capacity building support


March-April 2016
Psychological First Aid
Training: Sining Galing
with CCP
REGULAR CONDUCT OF NATIONAL EARTHQUAKE
SIMULTANEOUS DRILL

2016

Held in 21 April,
22 June;
Another to be held in 30
September
NDRRMC LED
PARTICIPATE IN THE NDRRMC PRE-DISASTER
RISK ASSESSMENT (PDRA)

Learning
Continuity and
Resilience
Interventions
DO A 24/7 DUTY AT THE NDRRMC OPCEN
DURING RED ALERT
P
S
Y
C
H
O
S
O
C
I
A
L
Conducted for students
affected by Typhoon
Nona in Oriental
Mindoro and
Marinduque (Feb. 2016)
P
S
Y
C
H
O
S
O
C
I Conducted for teachers and personnel of
A Rizal Division who were affected by a bus
accident (2016)
L
Post-Disaster Needs Assessment (PDNA)
Conducted Post-Disaster Needs
Assessment (PDNA) in Batanes, R2 and
CAR
PROVISION OF TEMPORARY LEARNING SPACE (TLS)

EXTERIOR
PERSPECTIVE

1 - CLASSROOM

INTERIOR
PERSPECTIVE
2016 TLS Funds for Disaster-affected Schools
NAME OF DISASTER BATCH NO. NO. OF SCHOOLS NO. OF TLS COST (PhP)
Nona 1 224 530 31,800,000
2 40 77 2,700,000
Subtotal 264 607 34,500,000
Habagat 1 2 9 540,000
Carina 1 2 5 300,000
Karen and Lawin 1 165 436 26,160,000
2 57 67 4,020,000
Yolanda Rehab and 1 2 9 540,000
Recovery
Fire Incidents - 3 21 1,260,000
Subtotal 231 547 32,280,000
Grand Total 642 1,498 67,320,000
2016 Clean-Up Fund for Disaster-affected Schools
NAME OF DISASTER BATCH NO. NO. OF SCHOOLS COST (PhP)

Nona 1 1,348 20,220,000


Ferdie 1 12 180,000
1 608 9,195,000
Karen and Lawin 2 587 8,805,000
3 169 2,535,000
Subtotal 1,376 20,640,000
Grand Total 3,643
Rehabilitation and Recovery
DepEd-DPWH Design

• NO CHANGE ON THE
ARCHITECTURAL
FEATURES;

• CHANGES WERE
MADE ON THE • Disaster resilient School Building Design;
STRUCTURAL ASPECTS • Complies with the requirement of the National
Structural Code of the Philippines (NSCP) 2010;
OF THE BUILDING • Can withstand wind velocity of up to 250 KPH;
• Designed to resist against an earthquake;
THANK YOU!

You might also like