Trade reforms have had a positive effect on total factor
productivity growth by a Paul Romer type ‘endogenous growth’ mechanisms where TFPG is positively impacted by an increasing variety of capital goods.
Trade reforms of the 1980s and 1990s allowed firms access
to capital and intermediate goods from abroad. The current trade policy reforms seem to have been guided mainly by the concerns over globalization of the Indian economy, improving competitiveness of its industry, and adverse balance of payments situation. Main features of trade policies (trade reforms) since 1991 are as follows:
1. Freer Imports and Exports:
Substantial simplification and liberalization has been carried out in the reform period. The tariff line wise import policy was first announced on March 31, 1996 and at that time itself 6,161 tariff lines were made free. 2. Rationalization of Tariff Structure: Acting on the recommendations of the Chelliah Committee, the government has, over the years, reduced the maximum rate of duty. The 1993-94, Budget had reduced it from 110 per cent to 85 per cent. The successive Budgets have reduced it further in stages. The peak import duty on non-agricultural goods is now only 12.5 per cent. 3. Decentralization: A large number of exports and imports used to be centralized through the public sector agencies in India. The supplementary trade policy announced on August 13, 1991 reviewed these centralized items and decentralized 16 export items and 20 import items. The 1992-97 policy decentralized imports of a number of items including newsprint, non-ferrous metals, natural rubber, intermediates and raw materials for fertilizers. 4. Devaluation and Convertibility of Rupee on Current Account: The government made a two- step downward adjustment of 18-19 per cent in the exchange rate of the rupee on July 1 and July 3, 1991. This was followed by the introduction of LERMS i.e., partial convertibility of rupee in 1992-93, full convertibility on the trade account in 1993-94 and full convertibility on the current account in August 1994. 5. Trading Houses: The 1991 policy allowed export houses and trading houses to import a wide range of items. The government also permitted the setting up of trading houses with 51 per cent foreign equity for the purpose of promoting exports. 6. Special Economic Zones: A scheme for setting up Special Economic Zones (SEZs) in the country to promote exports was announced by the government in the Export and Import Policy of March 31, 2000. The SEZs are to provide an internationally competitive and hassle-free environment for exports and are expected to give a boost to the country’s exports. 7. Agriculture Export Zones: The Exim Policy 2001 introduced the concept of Agri- Export Zones (AEZs) to give primacy to promotion of agricultural exports and effect a reorganization of our export efforts on the basis of specific products and specific geographical areas. Features of Trade Policy Reform in India Rationalization of tariff structure/reducing tariffs. Decentralization. Free imports and Exports. Liberalization of the exchange rate regime. Setting up of trading houses, SEZ’s and Export promotion industrial parks. Various exemptions under the EXIM policies to boost exports and imports and make the trade policy regime transparent and less cumbersome. Trade Policy Reforms in India The most significant step for trade policy reform in India was in the 1990s, to move away from import substitution and enhance reliance on the international economy. Since 1991, India has been gradually moving away from a closed and protectionist economy and has been orienting itself towards the market, both in terms of disinvestment (privatization) and opening up markets to foreign players (liberalization). The trade reform was accompanied by major modifications of the labor regime in order to reduce labor rigidities, and reforms in the financial sector for the purpose of enhancing resource mobility. The purpose of the trade reforms was to expose domestic producers to international competition, increase efficiency, accelerate growth and reduce at the same time the prices faced by consumers. However, in adapting to such a market oriented economy, it has not assumed a “shock therapy” approach and has instead embraced a gradual approach.2 Unlike many countries, such as in Latin America and Eastern Europe, India did not succumb to international pressures (from IMF or the World Bank) to liberalize overnight and went in for unilateral liberalization. CONCLUSION:- Trade reform programs have two main objectives. The first is to help raise economic growth and employment generation by improving resource allocation and economy wide efficiency. The second is to help improve the balance of payments by strengthening the competitiveness of the external sector and expanding exports and efficient import substitutes. Trade policy reform, when implemented well, has contributed to improved economic performance in developing countries. The paper also finds that well-designed trade policy reforms do not conflict with other priorities except in special cases; usually they enhance growth.