Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Heptits Chronic B
Heptits Chronic B
Marion Peters MD
University of California
San Francisco
Slide 1
HBV is a life long, dynamic disease
Slide 2
Who should be tested for HBV?new
• Blood and organs donors
• Hemodialysis patients
• Pregnant women
• Infants of HBsAg + mothers
• Behavioural contacts:
o Household and sexual contacts
o HIV+, MSM, IDU
• Individuals from countries where prevalence is ≥2%
• Patients receiving immunosuppressive therapy
• Abnormal ALT of unknown cause
CDC 2008
Slide 3
Overlapping HIV and HBV
Epidemics
HBV
HIV
HBsAg+
35-40 million
350-400 million
400 million
3.5- 4 million
4 million
Slide 5
Geographic Distribution of HBV Genotypes
Greenland:
A, B, D
Ae, Bj, C,
D, F
B, A/Bj A
e D
B,C,A,D G C
Bj
G
D A D B
FF&
1, H
B
H
a
H
E B3
F2 A BC D
a
Slide 6
Natural history of HBV
Slide 7
The phases of chronic hepatitis B
Immune Immune Immune Immune
tolerance clearance control escape
HBeAg+ve HBeAg–ve
< >< >
HBV-DNA
ALT
Slide 9
Therapeutic endpoints over time
Improved Improved
histology Anti-HBs+ survival
Anti-HBe+ Loss of
HBsAg
Loss of
HBeAg
Loss of
HBV DNA
TIME
Slide 10
Who should be considered for treatment?
Immune Immune Immune Immune
tolerance clearance control escape
HBeAg+ve HBeAg–ve
< >< >
HBV-DNA
ALT
treat treat
HBeAg +ve Inactive (carrier) HBeAg –ve/+ve active
chronic hepatitis state chronic hepatitis
Slide 11
Overview of Algorithm Used to Determine
Need for Treatment of HBV
ALT Level
Significant fibrosis or
Treat
inflammation
Slide 13
HBV Nucs: Nonresponse, Suboptimal
Response, and Virologic Breakthrough
1.0
Antiviral Drug
0 Primary
nonresponse Virologic
breakthrough
-1.0
ange in HBV DNA
(log10 IU/mL) Suboptimal response
-2.0
-3.0
1 log
-4.0 Nadir
0 6 12 18
Months
Lok AS, et al. Hepatology. 2007;45:507-539.
Slide 15
HBeAg Seroconversion Rates Over
Time in HBeAg-Positive Patients
0
1.0 Yr 1.5-2.0 Yrs 3.0-4.0 Yrs
*With sustained undetectable HBV DNA.
Chang TT, et al. J Viral Hepat. 2009;16:784-789. Chang TT, et al. AASLD 2006. Abstract 109. Lau GK, et al. N Engl J Med.
2005;352:2682-2695. Marcellin P, et al. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:2442-2455. Buster EH, et al. Gastroenterology. 2008;135;459-
467. Heathcote J, et al. AASLD 2008. Abstract 158. Heathcote J, et al. AASLD 2009. Abstract 483.
Janssen HL, et al. Lancet. 2005;365;123-129. CCO Hepatitis
Slide 16
HBsAg Loss Over Time in HBeAg-
Positive Patients
100
Extended Treatment With Nucleos(t)ide Analogues*
vs 1 Yr Peginterferon Treatment
80 Entecavir
Tenofovir
60 Peginterferon
HBsAg Loss (%)
40
20
5 5 6 6 8 8
2 3
NA
0
1.0 Yr 1.5-2.0 Yrs 3.0-4.0 Yrs
*With sustained undetectable HBV DNA.
Chang TT, et al. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:1001-1010. Marcellin P, et al. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:2442-2455. Buster EH, et al.
Gastroenterology. 2008;135;459-467. Gish R, et al. Gastroenterology. 2007;133:1437-1444. Heathcote J. AASLD 2008. Abstract
158. Heathcote J, et al. AASLD 2009. Abstract 483. Janssen HL, et al. Lancet. 2005;365:123-129. CCO Hepatitis
Slide 17
Predictors of HBsAg Loss in
HBeAg-Positive Patients
• Race: whites > nonwhites[1]
• Genotype[1-3]
o Nucleos(t)ide analogues: A and D
o Peginterferon: A
• Serum HBsAg decline during first 24 wks with
nucleos(t)ide analogues[1]
• HBeAg negative at or within 26 wks of completing
peginterferon treatment[3]
1. Heathcote EJ, et al. EASL 2009. Abstract 909. 2. Gish RG, et al. J Viral Hepat. 2010;17:16-22.
3. Buster EH, et al. Gastroenterology. 2008;135;459-467. CCO Hepatitis
Slide 18
Undetectable HBV DNA Over Time in
HBeAg-Negative Patients
Not head-to-head trials; different patient populations and trial designs
20 15 16
NA
0
*Single center study. 1 Yr 2 Yrs 3 Yrs
Lok AS, et al. Hepatology. 2009;50:661-662. Marcellin P, et al. AASLD 2008. Abstract 146. Marcellin P, et al. AASLD 2009. Abstract
481. Marcellin P, et al. Gastroenterology. 2009;136:2169-2179. Baqai S, et al. AASLD 2009. Abstract 476. Lai CL,
et al. Hong Kong International Liver Congress 2006. CCO Hepatitis
Slide 19
HBsAg Loss Over Time in
HBeAg-Negative Patients
20 9
4 7
<1 0 <1 0 NA 0
0
1.0 Yr 1.5-2.0 Yrs 3.0-4.0 Yrs
*With sustained undetectable HBV DNA.
Lai CL, et al. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:1011-1020. Marcellin P, et al. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:2442-2455.
Marcellin P, et al. AASLD 2008. Abstract 146. Shouval D, et al. J Hepatol. 2009;50:289-295.
Marcellin P, et al. AASLD 2009. Abstract 481. Brunetto M, et al. EASL 2008. Abstract 683. CCO Hepatitis
Slide 20
HBsAg Levels at Wk 12 of PegIFN Predict
Off-Therapy SVR in HBeAg-Negative Pts
• 48 pts pegIFN alfa-2a for 48 wks
• SVR: undetectable HBV DNA (< 29 IU/mL) at Wk 24 following
treatment completion
• Change in HBsAg level from baseline to Wk 12 evaluated as
predictor of SVR
o Cutoff: 0.5 log10 IU/mL decrease
o PPV: 89% – NPV: 90%
Nucleoside analogue
Nucleotide analogue
TDF ETV
LdT
LAM
otency of HBV DNA suppression
ADV
Likelihood of resistance
development
Slide 22
Antiviral resistance increases over time
80
Lamivudine1 70%
Adefovir2 65%
60 Entecavir (LAM-resistant)3
53%
Entecavir (naive)3 ***
Telbivudine4 42%
40%
40
of resistance (%)
29%
24% 25%
20%
20
15% 18%
12% 11%
5%
0.1% 0% 0.3% 2% 0.4% 0.8%
0
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
Slide 26
Cirrhosis
• 5 y Survival 84% for compensated
• 5 y Survival 14-35% for decompensated6
• Interferons are safe and effective in compensated HBV
cirrhosis only1 (I)
• Nucleoside analogues have been shown prospectively
to be safe, decrease rates of liver decompensation and
to decrease the development of HCC2 (I)
• All cirrhotic patients with HBV DNA>2000 IU/mL should
be treated regardless of ALT3-5 (III)
• Many experts recommend treating compensated
cirrhotics with any detectable viral load3 (III)
1Buster, 2007; 2Liaw, 2004; 3Keeffe, 2008; 4Liaw 2008 (APASL); 5Lok 2007; 6Kim 2004
Slide 27
Treatment decreases HBV disease progression
even with YMDD mutant status
25
Placebo (n=215)
YMDD mutants (n=209) (49%) 21%
20 Wild-type (n=221)
15
Patients with disease 13%
progression (%)
10
5%
5
0
0 6 12 18 24 30 36
Controls
0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48
Time (mo)
Cumulative probability of survival without liver transplantation
Yao FY, et al. Hepatology. 2001;34:411.
Slide 29
Liver Transplantation and HBV
Progress in Past Decade
HBIG
Era 1 (1987-1991) LAM
1
1 Era 3 (1997-2002)
0.9
0.9
0.8
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.5
0.5
P < 0.01 HBV P = .14
vival % Other Survival %
Other
HBV
012345 012345
Time (years) Time (years)
Slide 32
Reactivation of HBV
• Highest in HBV active disease
1.HBsAg pos, HBeAg pos, high HBV DNA
2.HBsAg pos, HBeAb pos, low HBV DNA
3.HBsAg neg, anti-HBs pos, anti-HBc pos
o Deaths occur in all groups
• ALL patients undergoing chemotherapy
must have tested HBsAg, HBsAb and
HBcAb prior to treatment
Slide 33
HBV is a dynamic disease
• Diagnose
• Initial evaluation includes education
o Family and sexual contacts should be tested
o counsel drugs to avoid- steroids, chemo, BRM
• Monitor as status changes over time
• Selection of patients to treat
o Individualize treatment decisions
o Change if no/ poor response
• Long term monitoring
o HCC, special populations, reactivation
Slide 35
HBV: The importance of monitoring
Require monitoring…
• Inactive disease may not remain inactive
• Liver damage may occur if HBV
reactivates
HBV can be controlled but not cured
Slide 36