Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Anfo Vs Emulsion
Anfo Vs Emulsion
Anfo Vs Emulsion
Blasting Applications
1
Ammonium Nitrate
UHDE, Germany
Stamicarbon, Netherlands
Deepak Fertilisers Have Acquired The Top Notch Technologies In LDAN Production
3
ANFO/ANFO Blends
Key Questions
Is it Globally preferred
Way Forward for product ? If so, why ?
introduction in Mining ANFO/ANFO
Blends
Product Basket
Global Supplier Straight
ANFO ANFO Blends
Emulsion
Orica Yes Yes Yes
Dyno Nobel Yes Yes Yes
Maxam Yes Yes Yes
AEL Yes Yes Yes
Austin Powder Yes Yes Yes
Indian Explosive Manu. ---- Yes ----
4000
3600
4873
VOLUME IN KMT
3898
1600
1500
1197
1184
1065
644
926
515
744
70
USA LATIN AMERICA FORMER USSR AFRICA INDIA CHINA AUSTRALIA
REGION
Light
Soft/Medium ANFO ANFO
ANFO ANFO
Low High
Fracture Intensity
8
Strength of Explosives
SHOCK Impedance of
+ ENERGY
Explosives
Energy
GAS
ENERGY
Loading &
Hauling
20-30%
Drilling Crushing
15-20%
Blasting Maint
50-
60%
AN
HSD Prills
absorbe
d by Air
Porous Spaces
Prills
11
Hard, Brittle Rock
Small crushed Many cracks form
zone
Rock cannot
bend easily
Free
face
Cracking is important
Cracks travel well
Blasting process
Impact Eject
Gases wedge
into cracks
Fragmentation is defined
Techno-Commercial
Benefits - ANFO
16
Loading Pattern
115 mm 115 mm
3 M tr
Stemming
3 M tr
8 Mtrr
57 Kg EMULSION
8 Mtr
Explosive
41.5 Kg ANFO
17
Results of blast with ANFO and Bulk
Explosives
18
Explosive Type And Rock Mass Properties
Gas/heave/bubble energy is
dominant in ANFO which contributes
in fragmentation of rock
About 60 % fragmentation is
attributed to heave energy and only
20 % to shock energy.
σc (Uniaxial compressive
strength), MPa
Source: Drilling & Blasting- Jimeno Lopez
There is a lot of Deepak in Explosives
AN Manufacturers
AN Manufacturers
Explosives
Manufacturers Assured Supply Everytime
Priorities Accident
Profits Limitations
Loss
End Users (90% AN
of Deepak
End Users (68% of
Fertilisers)
AN of Deepak We make you self-reliant
Fertilisers)
20
The Right Explosives - Why ANFO ?
ANFO Emulsion
o Formulation cannot be o Formulation can be altered.
altered. ANFO will always Can have anywhere between
Consistency
have 94% AN 65% to 75% AN
ANFO Emulsion
o Lowest blasting cost o High per unit blasting cost
o Highest energy o Moderate energy. RWS
o Best fragmentation always lower than that of
Lowest TCO o Lowest ground vibration ANFO
o Inferior fragmentation and
muck looseness. Affects
productivity of downstream
processes
ANFO Emulsion
Security of
o Self reliance o Dependence on 3rd party
Supplies
21
Summary of Global Practice
Holes with little water, are loaded with ANFO Blends at the bottom
and ANFO at the top.
All wet holes are loaded with Emulsion doped with Porous Prilled
Ammonium Nitrate .
• Lower per unit Energy Cost. • Higher per unit Energy Cost.
• Suitable for soft to medium- hard rock • Not suitable for highly stratified
rock
ANFO has 25% higher gas energy which results in better fragmentation &
looseness of muck pile 23
Techno-commercial Benefits ?
Water -18-22%
AN – 94%
AN/Oxidiser – 72-
78%
ANFO.
No Water
Easy to balance formulation
You know what you are using Bulk Emulsion.
Due to higher Oxidiser content ANFO/ ANFO Blends have more Energy
Mine to Mill
More Environment friendly – Less vibration by approx. 18% at distance of 100 mt,
Less dust generation & Lesser emission of obnoxious gases
PRILLED AN
GODOWN OFFICE
PLAN VIEW
OFFICE &
PRILLED AN
GODOWN,
ONE AFTER
ANOTHER
FRONT VIEW
ENTRANCE
Raw Materials
BOREHOLE
Shed for Mixing & Delivery System
Thanks
38