Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Effect of Computerized Instruction On Learning English Prepositions
The Effect of Computerized Instruction On Learning English Prepositions
The Effect of Computerized Instruction On Learning English Prepositions
Pinkan 2015-031-005e
Why do I choose this topic?
Up until now, English
prepositions are still
difficult to be mastered
even for advanced
learners
What makes it difficult to learn?
In Indonesia, we know it
as “di” instead of “in, on,
at”
Statement of problem
There are only few studies
that prove the efficacy of
eCALL in learning English
Prepositions Statement of purpose
This present study aims to
investigate the
effectiveness of
computerized instruction
on learning English
Prepositions in EFL context
This study will give beneficial
information for EFL teachers
regarding the use of eCALL to apply
explicit instruction in teaching
Significance of
English prepositions
the study
Does explicit grammar online instruction
effectively increase learners’ spatial sense
comprehension as measured by the picture
comprehension task of in, on, and at?
Research
Does explicit grammar online instruction
Questions effectively increase learners’ ability to use the
temporal sense as measured by the picture
description task of in, on, and at?
Underlying
Theories
eCALL
4 important instructional factors that are covered by eCALL
1 2
Provide immediate Can be used to present
corrective feedback explicit rule instruction
3 4
Allow teachers and
Can be a tool for
researchers to trace
modeling target language
students’ performance
Prepositions
Participant Data Research Instruments Data Collection Procedure Data Analysis Procedure
Initial pool: 34 students
The scores of pre-test and Pre-test and Post-test. Each A Mann-Whitney U test (p=.05)
OPT ≥ 40 (pre-intermediate level) Day 1: OPT part 1 (30 minutes)
post-test consisted of: to compare the scores between
21 students of tenth and : Pre-test (30 minutes)
of both experimental and Picture Comprehension groups
eleventh grade Day 2 : OPT part 2 (30 minutes)
control group Task (PCT) A Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test (p=
11 in experimental group & 10 : Treatment (45 minutes)
(15 numbers: 9 .05) to compare the scores
in control group : Post-test (30 minutes)
spatial; 6 temporal) within groups
Picture Description Task
(PDT)
(20 numbers: 10
spatial; 1 temporal)
Findings
Picture Comprehension Task
9.00
8.50
8.00
7.5 7.6 Pre-test
7.50 Post-test
7.00 6.9 6.8
6.50
Experimental CTRL
5.5
5.50 Pre-test
5.1 Post-test
4.9
4.50
Experimental CTRL
Picture Comprehension Task
5.40
5.20
5.00 4.9
4.8
4.80 Pre-test
4.60 4.5 Post-test
4.4
4.40
4.20
4.00
Experimental CTRL
Sense 9.00
8.2
8.00
Pre-test
7.3 Post-test
7
7.00
6.5
6.00
Experimental CTRL
Conclusion
The findings show that the experimental
group does not seem to be more superior to
the control group.
No delayed post-test
2 Delayed post-test is
needed