Ultrasonic Testing: NDT Training & Certification

You might also like

Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 48

NDT Training & Certification

Ultrasonic Testing
Part 2

mmz 2003
Ultrasonic Testing techniques
 Pulse Echo
 Through Transmission
 Transmission with Reflection

mmz 2003
Pulse Echo Technique
 Single probe sends
and receives sound
 Gives an indication of
defect depth and
dimensions
 Not fail safe

mmz 2003
Defect Position

B
A

No indication from defect A (wrong orientation)


mmz 2003
Through Transmission Technique
Tx Rx
Transmitting and
receiving probes
on opposite sides
of the specimen

Presence of defect
indicated by
reduction in
transmission signal

No indication of
defect location

Fail safe method

mmz 2003
mmz 2003
Through Transmission Technique

Advantages Disadvantages
 Less attenuation  Defect not located
 No probe ringing  Defect can’t be
 No dead zone identified
 Orientation does not  Vertical defects
matter don’t show
 Must be automated
 Need access to both
surfaces
mmz 2003
Transmission with Reflection
T R

Also known as:


Tandem Technique or
Pitch and Catch Technique
mmz 2003
Ultrasonic Pulse
 A short pulse of electricity is applied to a
piezo-electric crystal
 The crystal begins to vibration increases
to maximum amplitude and then decays
Maximum

10% of
Maximum

mmz 2003

Pulse length
Pulse Length
 The longer the pulse, the more
penetrating the sound
 The shorter the pulse the better the
sensitivity and resolution

Short pulse, 1 or 2 cycles Long pulse 12 cycles


mmz 2003
Ideal Pulse Length

5 cycles for weld testing

mmz 2003
The Sound Beam
 Dead Zone
 Near Zone or Fresnel Zone
 Far Zone or Fraunhofer Zone

mmz 2003
The Sound Beam

NZ FZ Main
Beam

Intensity
varies

Exponential Decay

mmz 2003
Distance
The side lobes has multi
minute main beams
Two identical defects may
give different amplitudes of
signals

Near
Side Lobes
Zone
The main beam or the centre
beam has the highest
intensity of sound energy

Main Lobe Any reflector hit by the main


beam will reflect the high
amount of energy
Main Beam

mmz 2003
Sound Beam
Near Zone Far Zone
 Thickness  Thickness
measurement measurement
 Detection of defects  Defect detection
 Sizing of large  Sizing of all defects
defects only

Near zone length as small as possible

mmz 2003
Near Zone

2
D
Near Zone 
4
V

f
2
D f
Near Zone 
4V
mmz 2003
Near Zone
 What is the near zone length of a 5MHz
compression probe with a crystal diameter
of 10mm in steel?
2
D f
Near Zone 
4V
10  5,000,000
2

4  5,920,000
 21.1mm mmz 2003
Near Zone
2 2
D D f
Near Zone  
4 4V
 The bigger the diameter the bigger the
near zone
 The higher the frequency the bigger the
near zone
 The lower the velocity the bigger the near
zone
Should large diameter crystal probes have a high
or low frequency? mmz 2003
Which of the above probes has the longest Near Zone ?

1 M Hz
5 M Hz
1 M Hz 5 M Hz

mmz 2003
Near Zone
2 2
D D f
Near Zone  
4 4V
 The bigger the diameter the bigger the
near zone
 The higher the frequency the bigger the
near zone
 The lower the velocity the bigger the near
zone
Should large diameter crystal probes have a high
or low frequency? mmz 2003
Beam Spread
 In the far zone sound pulses spread out
as they move away from the crystal

/2

 K KV
Sine  or
2 D Df
mmz 2003
Beam Spread
 K KV
Sine  or
2 D Df
Edge,K=1.22
20dB,K=1.08
6dB,K=0.56
Beam axis
or Main Beam
mmz 2003
Beam Spread
 K KV
Sine  or
2 D Df
 The bigger the diameter the smaller the
beam spread
 The higher the frequency the smaller
the beam spread

Which has the larger beam spread, a compression


or a shear wave probe?
mmz 2003
Beam Spread
 What is the beam spread of a 10mm,5MHz
compression wave probe in steel?

 KV
Sine 
2 Df
1.08  5920

5000 10
 0.1278  7.35 o
mmz 2003
Which of the above probes has the Largest Beam
Spread ?

1 M Hz
5 M Hz
1 M Hz 5 M Hz

mmz 2003
Beam Spread
 K KV
Sine  or
2 D Df
 The bigger the diameter the smaller the
beam spread
 The higher the frequency the smaller
the beam spread

Which has the larger beam spread, a compression


or a shear wave probe?
mmz 2003
Testing close to side walls

mmz 2003
Sound at an Interface
 Sound will be either transmitted across
or reflected back
Reflected

How much is reflected and


Interface transmitted depends upon the
relative acoustic impedance of
the 2 materials

Transmitted mmz 2003


The Phenomenon of Sound

REFLECTION
REFRACTION
DIFFRACTION

mmz 2003
The Phenomenon of Sound

REFLECTION
REFRACTION
DIFFRACTION

mmz 2003
Law of Reflection
 Angle of Incidence = Angle of Reflection

60o 60o

mmz 2003
Inclined incidence(not at o
90 )
Incident

Transmitted

The sound is refracted due to differences in


sound velocity in the 2 DIFFERENT materials
mmz 2003
REFRACTION
 Only occurs when:
The incident angle is other than 0°

30°

Water Steel Water

Steel Steel Steel

Refracted

mmz 2003
REFRACTION
 Only occurs when:
The incident angle is other than 0°
The Two Materials has different
VELOCITIES

30°
30°

Steel Water

Steel Steel
65°
30°

No Refraction Refracted
mmz 2003
Snell’s Law
Normal

Incident I
Material 1

Material 2 Refracted
R

Sine I Vel in Material 1



Sine R Vel in Material 2
mmz 2003
Snell’s Law
C
20 Sine I Vel in Material 1

Sine R Vel in Material 2
Perspex
Sine 20 2730

Steel Sine 48.3 5960
48.3 0.4580  0.4580
C

mmz 2003
Snell’s Law
Sine I Vel in Material 1
C
15 
Sine R Vel in Material 2
Sine 15 2730
Perspex 
Sine R 5960
Steel
5960
34.4 SinR  Sin15
2730
C
SinR  0.565
mmz 2003R  34.4
Snell’s Law
C
20

Perspex

Steel
48.3

C
24
S
mmz 2003
Snell’s Law
C
C When an incident beam of sound
approaches an interface of two
different materials:
REFRACTION occurs

Perspex
There may be more than one waveform
Steel transmitted into the second material,
example: Compression and Shear

When a waveform changes


into another waveform:
C MODE CHANGE
C
SS
mmz 2003
Snell’s Law
If the angle of Incident is
C increased the angle of
refraction also increases

Up to a point where the


Compression Wave is at
Perspex 90° from the Normal

Steel 90° This happens at the


FIRST CRITICAL ANGLE

C
S

mmz 2003
1st Critical Angle
C 27.4 Compression wave refracted
at 90 degrees

33

mmz 2003
2nd Critical Angle
C
C
57

S (Surface Wave)
90

Shear wave refracted at 90 degrees

Shear wave becomes a surface wave


mmz 2003
1st Critical Angle Calculation
C 27.2 Sine I 2730

Sine 90 5960
Perspex
Sin90  1
C
Steel 2730
SinI 
5960
S SinI  0.458

mmz 2003 I  27.26


2nd Critical Angle Calculation
C C Sine I 2730
57.4 
Sine 90 3240
Perspex
Sin90  1
S
Steel 2730
SinI 
3240
SinI  0.8425

mmz 2003 I  57.4


Before the 1st. Critical Angle: There
1st. are both Compression and Shear
wave in the second material
C
At the FIRST CRITICAL ANGLE
2nd. Compression wave refracted at 90°
Shear wave at 33 degrees in the
material

90° Between the 1st. And 2nd.


Beyond the 2nd. Critical Angle: Only SHEAR
Critical Angle: All wave in the material.
waves are reflected Compression is reflected out
out of the material. NO of the material.
wave in the material.
S C At the 2nd. Critical Angle: Shear
is refracted to 90° and become
33° SURFACE wave

mmz 2003
mmz 2003
Summary
 Standard angle probes between 1st and
2nd critical angles (45,60,70)
 Stated angle is refracted angle in steel
 No angle probe under 35, and more
than 80: to avoid being 2 waves in the
same material. One Defect Two Echoes

C S

S
mmz 2003
Snell’s Law
 Calculate the 1st critical angle for a
perspex/copper interface
 V Comp perspex : 2730m/sec
 V Comp copper : 4700m/sec

2730
SinI   0.5808  35.5
4700

mmz 2003

You might also like