The document discusses dividend policy and the dividend irrelevance theory. It describes different types of dividend policies companies may use, including stable, constant, and residual dividend policies. While the dividend irrelevance theory suggests dividends do not impact stock prices, studies show stock prices often change around dividend payout dates. The document also provides an example of Kinder Morgan, whose dividend cut initially lowered its stock price but ultimately strengthened the company's financial position.
The document discusses dividend policy and the dividend irrelevance theory. It describes different types of dividend policies companies may use, including stable, constant, and residual dividend policies. While the dividend irrelevance theory suggests dividends do not impact stock prices, studies show stock prices often change around dividend payout dates. The document also provides an example of Kinder Morgan, whose dividend cut initially lowered its stock price but ultimately strengthened the company's financial position.
The document discusses dividend policy and the dividend irrelevance theory. It describes different types of dividend policies companies may use, including stable, constant, and residual dividend policies. While the dividend irrelevance theory suggests dividends do not impact stock prices, studies show stock prices often change around dividend payout dates. The document also provides an example of Kinder Morgan, whose dividend cut initially lowered its stock price but ultimately strengthened the company's financial position.
Dividend policy is the policy a company uses to structure its dividend payout to shareholders.
Some researchers suggest that dividend policy
may be irrelevant, in theory, because investors can sell a portion of their shares or portfolio if they need funds.
This is the "dividend irrelevance theory," and it
infers that dividend payouts have minimal impact on stock price. DIVIDEND IRRELEVANCE THEORY
The dividend irrelevance theory is the theory
that investors do not need to concern themselves with a company's dividend policy since they have the option to sell a portion of their portfolio of equities if they want cash. The dividend irrelevance theory indicates that a company’s declaration and payment of dividends should have little to no impact on stock price.
If this theory holds true, it would mean that
dividends do not add value to a company’s stock price. Yet studies show that stocks that do pay a dividend often increase in price by the amount of the dividend as the book closure date approaches.
Although the dividend may not actually be paid
until a few days after this date, given the logistics of processing such a large number of payments, the price of the stock usually drops again the amount of the dividend.
Buyers after this date are no longer entitled to
the dividend. These practical examples can conflict with the dividend irrelevance theory. STABLE DIVIDEND POLICY
easiest and most commonly used
The goal of the policy is steady and predictable
dividend payouts each year. Whether earnings are up or down, investors receive a dividend.
The goal is to align the dividend policy with the
long-term growth of the company rather than with quarterly earnings volatility.
This approach gives the shareholder more
certainty concerning the amount and timing of the dividend. CONSTANT DIVIDEND POLICY Under the constant dividend policy, a company pays a percentage of its earnings as dividends every year.
If earnings are up, investors get a
larger dividend; if earnings are down, investors may not receive a dividend.
The primary drawback to the method is the
volatility of earnings and dividends. RESIDUAL DIVIDEND POLICY
With a residual dividend policy, the company
pays out what dividends remain after the company has paid for capital expenditures and working capital.
This approach is volatile, but it makes the most
sense in terms of business operations. Investors do not want to invest in a company that justifies its increased debt with the need to pay dividends. REAL WORLD EXAMPLE OF DIVIDEND POLICY Kinder Morgan (KMI) shocked the investment world when in 2015 they cut their dividend payout by 75%, a move that saw their share price tank. However, many investors found the company on solid footing and making sound financial decisions for their future. In this case, a company cutting their dividend actually worked in their favor, and six months after the cut, Kinder Morgan saw its share price rise almost 25%.
In early 2019, the company again raised its dividend
payout by 25%, a move which helped to reinvigorate investor confidence in the energy company. As of May 5, 2019. KMI is trading at 150% of its 2015 lows, with a dividend yield of 5.12%.