Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Pataya Food Industries LTD: A Warehouse Case Study: International University
Pataya Food Industries LTD: A Warehouse Case Study: International University
INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY
Major : Logistics and Supply Chain Management
Instructor : Nguyen Hoang Huy
Subject : Warehouse engineering management
OUTLINE
01 Introduction
Warehouse
02
processes
Storage and handling
03
equipment
Warehouse
health and 04
safety
Order – picking
05
system
Aggregate planning
06
model for inventory
3
0
Introductio
n
4
Warehouse
Introduction
Established in 1999
Located in Tra Noc 1
Industrial Park, Can
Tho City
Main purpose
http://xaydunghatangkcncantho.com/cty-thue-lai-dat/320-cty-cn-thu%C3%8C%C2%A
3c-pha%C3%8C%E2%80%B0m-pataya-vn.html
5
4 PRODUCT GROUPS
Ingredients: additives
and veggies (ING)
Packagings: primary
and secondary (PKG)
0
Warehouse
Processes
7
WAREHOUSE OPERATION
8
RECEIPT
9
STORAGE
10
SHIPMENT
1
0
Storage and handling
equipment
12
N
Types of
o Name of equipment Quantity
equipment
.
Handling 1 Live (powered) roller conveyor 2
equipment 2 Chain conveyor 2
3 Slat conveyor 2
4 Forklift (fork truck) 10
5 Turntable 10
6 Barcode system 1
7 Thermometer 12
Storage 8 Selective pallet rack 8
equipment 9 Drive-through rack 8
1
Plastic crate 100
0
13
0
Warehouse health
and safety
14
Manual handling
Forklift truck Fire safety
15
https://www.pennyhydraulics
.com/help-guides/manual-han https://www.indiamart.com/p
dling-guidelines-safe-manua roddetail/fire-safety-poste https://www.creativesafetysupply.c
l-lifting-at-work/ r-14976189488.html om/articles/forklift-safetytips/
15
0
Order – picking
system
16
PROBLEMS
Still reliant on paper-based
picking
MODEL DESCRIPTION
• The below model is based upon the formulations of the traveling salesman
problem (TSP) and the bin packing problem (BPP)
• A variation should be considered. The decision variable takes on a binary value
of 0 or 1 depending on whether or not the location k is visited immediately after
the location I in an order picking sequence of a batch B.
• If it is assumed that n orders are arrived, the number of batches is n at the worst
case, and the minimum number of batches is n/C. The objective function
minimizes the total picking time of tours or batches and holding time of orders of
the tour. and represent picking factor and holding factor, respectively. They give
weights on each component.
• If and then the above formulation minimizes only the picking time of a batch.
• If and then it tries to minimize the order holding time of a batch.
• By giving proper values to each factor depending upon the warehouse system,
e.g., and , the model can reflect the efficiency of the warehousing system and
the response of customer orders.
18
CONSTRAINTS
DESCRIPTION
• Constraints (1) and (2) represent that each arc in a tour or batch has exactly
two endpoints, i.e., one on either side of it.
• Constraint (3) is a sub-tour elimination constraint or no sub-tour allowed in
each batch. In other words, the optimal solution must only have one tour
connecting all the points in one batch. The fourth constraint represents that
the distance metric is the Tchebyshev metric. It has two independent motors
for horizontal and vertical direction.
• Constraint (5) computes order holding time within a batch.
• Constraint (6) specifies that because the picker or retrieval vehicle has its
capacity it cannot exceed its maximum items to be retrieved.
• Constraint (7) represents the relationship of the number of locations visited in
a tour or batch and the sum of items in the orders of a batch.
• Finally, constraint (8) ensures one order should be included in a batch B.
19
MODEL INPUT
DECISION VARIABLES
=
=
21
MODEL
22
Order Order Numb Order Numb
Order Order Order
numb arrival er of arrival er of
alias number alias
er time items time items
RAW
1 1 9:01 4 16 G 9:32 4
2 2 9:02 4 17 H 9:32 5
3 3 9:04 2 18 I 9:36 4
4
5
6
4
5
6
9:06
9:09
9:13
3
4
2
19
20
21
K
J
L
9:38
9:39
9:41
2
2
1
ORDER
7
8
7
8
9:18
9:18
5
4
22
23
M
N
9:41
9:45
5
2 DATA
9 9 9:19 1 24 O 9:49 3
10 A 9:21 5 25 P 9:52 2
11 B 9:21 5 26 Q 9:53 1
12 C 9:23 4 27 R 9:54 2
13 D 9:25 3 28 S 9:55 3
14 E 9:25 5 29 T 9:56 5
15 F 9:26 3 30 U 9:59 3 Batch PT HT RT
1 59.3 234.0 293.3
2 42.7 298.0 340.7
3 48.3 231.0 279.3
RESULT 4
Total
14.1
164.4
69.0
832.0
83.1
996.4
23
0
Aggregate planning
model for inventory
24
Table 1. Table 2.
DECISION VARIABLES:
OBJECTIVE FUNCTION
Minimize the following components:
Regular-time labor cost =
Overtime labor cost =
Cost of hiring and layoff =
Cost of holding inventory and stocking out =
Cost of materials and subcontracting =
+ + + +
27
CONSTRAINTS
Pt ≤ 40Wt + for t = 1, …, 6
3. Inventory balance constraints
It - 1 + Pt + Ct = Dt + St - 1 + It - St for t = 1, …, 6
4. Overtime limit constraints
Ot – 10Wt ≤ 0 for t = 1, …, 6
28
No.
No. Total
Laid Workforc Overtim Inventory Stockout Subcontrac Deman
Period t Hired Productio
Off, e Size, Wt e, Ot , It , St t, Ct d, Dt
, Ht n, Pt
Lt
0 0 0 80 0 1,000 0 0
1 0 16 64 0 1,960 0 0 2,560 1,600
2 0 0 64 0 1,520 0 0 2,560 3,000
3 0 0 64 0 880 0 0 2,560 3,200
4 0 0 64 0 0 220 140 2,560 3,800
5 0 0 64 0 140 0 0 2,560 2,200
6 0 0 64 0 550 0 0 2,560 2,200
29
REFERENCES
1. Rene & Nima. (2012). Determining the Number of Zones in a Pick-and-sort Order Picking System” by Rene and
Nima Zaerpour. Retrieved from:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/254308052_Determining_the_Number_of_Zones_in_a_Pick-and-sort_O
rder_Picking_System
2. René B. M. De Koster, Andrew L. Johnson & Debjit Roy. (2012). Warehouse design and management. New Jersey.
3. James Tompskin & Jerry D.Smith. (2013). The Warehouse Management Handbook. (p.230 & p.235).
4. Michale ten Hompel & Thorsten Schmidt. (2007). Warehouse Management: Automation and Organisation of
Warehouse and Order Picking Systems. New York: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
5. Gwynne Richards. (2014). Warehouse Management: a complete guide to improving efficiency and minimizing
costs in the modern warehouse (2 nd ed.). Kogan Page Limited.
6. Sunil Chopra & Peter Meindl. (2016). Supply Chain Management: strategy, planning and operation (6 th ed.).
United State of America: Pearson Education.
7. John J.Bartholdi, III & Steven T.Hackman. (August 19, 2014). Warehouse & Distribution science. United State of
America.
30
Contribution
THANK YOU
FOR LISTENING
32
Q&A
2