Safe Keeping Evolution Pattern

You might also like

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 25

PRESENTED BY

PROJECT GUIDE
Mrs. G KOMALA. MD IMRAN (16D31A0510).
PROJECT COORDINATOR V RAJASHEKAR (16D35A0508).
Mr. T.BENERJI. L VAMSHI KRISHNA (16D31A0547).
INDEX
1. INTRODUCTION.
2. EXISTING SYSTEM.
3. PROPOSED SYSTEM.
4. SOFTWARE REQUIREMENTS.
5. SCREENSHOTS.
6. COCLUSION.
7. FUTURE ENHANCEMENT.
1. INTRODUCTION:
 Pattern classification systems are commonly used in
adversarial applications, like biometric authentication,
network intrusion detection, and spam filtering, in which
data can be purposely manipulated by humans to
undermine their operation.
 As this adversarial scenario is not taken into account by
classical design methods, pattern classification systems
may exhibit vulnerabilities, whose exploitation may
severely affect their performance, and consequently limit
their practical utility.
 Extending pattern classification theory and design
methods to adversarial settings is thus a novel and very
relevant research direction, which has not yet been
pursued in a systematic way.
• Pattern classification systems may exhibit vulnerabilities, whose
exploitation may severely affect their performance, and consequently
limit their practical utility.
• In this paper, we address one of the main open issues: evaluating at
design phase the security of pattern classifiers, namely, the performance
degradation under potential attacks they may incur during operation.
• We propose a framework for empirical evaluation of classifier security
that formalizes and generalizes the main ideas proposed in the literature,
and give examples of its use in three real applications.
• Reported results show that security evaluation can provide a more
complete understanding of the classifier's behavior in adversarial
environments, and lead to better design choices.

0
2. EXISTING SYSTEM:
 Pattern classification systems based on classical theory and design
methods do not take into account adversarial settings, they exhibit
vulnerabilities to several potential attacks, allowing adversaries to
undermine their effectiveness.
 In particular, three main open issues can be identified:

 (i) analyzing the vulnerabilities of classification algorithms, and


the corresponding attacks.
 (ii) developing novel methods to assess classifier security against
these attacks, which is not possible using classical performance
evaluation methods .
 (iii) developing novel design methods to guarantee
classifier security in adversarial environments
DISADVANTAGES:
 Poor analyzing the vulnerabilities of classification
algorithms, and the corresponding attacks
 A malicious webmaster may manipulate search engine
rankings to artificially promote her1 website.
3. PROPOSED SYSTEMS:

 In this work we address issues above by developing a


framework for the empirical evaluation of classifier security at
design phase that extends the model selection and performance
evaluation steps of the classical design cycle.
 We summarize previous work, and point out three main ideas
that emerge from it. We then formalize and generalize them in
our framework (Section 3).
 First, to pursue security in the context of an arms race it is not
sufficient to react to observed attacks, but it is also necessary to
proactively anticipate the adversary by predicting the most
relevant, potential attacks through a what-if analysis; this
allows one to develop suitable countermeasures before the
attack actually occurs, according to the principle of security by
design.
ADVANTAGES:

 Prevents developing novel methods to assess


classifier security against these attack.
 The presence of an intelligent and adaptive
adversary makes the classification problem
highly non-stationary .
4. SOFTWARE REQUIREMENTS
 SOFTWARE REQUIREMENTS:
 Operating System : Windows
 Technology : Java and J2EE
 Web Technologies : Html, JavaScript,
 CSS
 IDE : My Eclipse
 Web Server : Tomcat
 HARDWARE REQUIREMENTS:

 Hardware - Pentium
 Speed - 1.1 GHz
 RAM - 1GB
 Hard Disk - 20 GB
 Floppy Drive - 1.44 MB
 Key Board - Standard Windows
 Mouse - Two or Three Button
 Monitor - SVGA
5. SCREENSHOTS
After running this window is displayed
This is the home window
Here, Go to File and select the Embed Message
Here, Go to pictures folder
Here, Select the picture
Here, Enter the password min 8char and enter the text and
click on GO
Here, Message is displayed
After encryption, Go to file and select Retrieve
message
Here, Select the master file
Here, This window is displayed and click on GO
Here, Enter the Password and click on Retrieve now
Finally, The Message is displayed
6. CONCLUSION
 In this paper we focused on empirical security evaluation
of pattern classifiers that have to be deployed in
adversarial environments, and proposed how to revise
the classical performance evaluation design step, which
is not suitable for this purpose.
 Our main contribution is a framework for empirical
security evaluation that formalizes and generalizes ideas
from previous work, and can be applied to different
classifiers, learning algorithms, and classification tasks.
 Our future work will be devoted to develop techniques
for simulating attacks for different applications.
7. FUTURE ENHANCEMENT
 In the future this project offers user to enter the data
through simple and interactive forms
 This is very helpful for the client to enter the desired
information through so much simplicity.
 The user mainly more concerned about the validity of
the data, what ever he/she is entering.
 There are checks on every stages of any new creation,
data entry or updating so that the user cannot enter the
invalid data which can create problem later.
THANK YOU….

You might also like