Professional Documents
Culture Documents
GEMS Presentation: Health Market Inquiry
GEMS Presentation: Health Market Inquiry
1 March 2016
Structure
About GEMS
o Background
o Mandate, Mission, Vision and Values
o Role of a Medical Scheme (Operating Framework)
o Products (Plans) and Enrolment Criteria (Income Bands)
o Governance and Service Structure
o Scheme Statistics
o Strategy and Approach
Impact of GEMS
o Industry Growth
o Access (No Underwriting)
o Decrease in non-healthcare Spend
Our Challenges
o PMBs
o Absence of Tariff and Pricing Structure
Considerations
ABOUT GEMS
(Who We Are)
Background
The public service is the country's largest employer with
approximately 1.3 million employees
In fulfilment of its obligation as an employer, the public service
provides its employees with a remunerative package structured to
include and cover:
o Retirement/Pensions (GEPF/GPAA)
o Housing Benefits (Allowance)
o Medical Benefits (Subsidy)
Prior to 2005, one of the challenges faced by the Employer was that
a significant and growing number of its employees were unable to
gain entry into existing medical schemes due to the high cost
structure
o To address this challenge it was resolved to establish a single restricted
membership medical scheme to cover public service employees
Our Mandate, Mission, Vision and Values
Values
Excellence
Member-centricity
Integrity
Value for money
Innovation
Evolution of the GEMS Mandate
and Role
Since 1999: Equitable Access to Medical Assistance
Cabinet approved the registration of GEMS in 2004
Registered in 2005 and commenced enrolment in
2006
July 2006 a new medical subsidy policy was
introduced
GEMS like all medical schemes operates within the
legal framework provided by the Medical Schemes
Act
The Role of a Medical Scheme
“Business of a medical scheme” means the business of undertaking liability in
return for a premium or contribution:
a) To make provision for the obtaining of any relevant health service;
b) To grant assistance in defraying expenditure incurred in connection with the rendering of any relevant
health service; and
c) Where applicable, to render a relevant health service, either by the medical scheme itself, or by any
supplier or group of suppliers of a relevant health service or by any person, in association with or in
terms of an agreement with a medical scheme
“restricted membership scheme” means a medical scheme, the rules of which
restrict the eligibility for membership by reference to:
a) Employment or former employment or both employment or former employment in a profession,
trade, industry or calling;
b) Employment or former employment or both employment or former employment by a particular
employer, or by an employer included in a particular class of employers;
c) Membership or former membership or both membership or former membership of a particular
profession, professional association or union; or
d) Any other prescribed matter
“rules” means the rules of a medical scheme and include:
a) The provisions of the law, charter, deed of settlement, memorandum of association or other
document by which the medical scheme is constituted;
b) The articles of association or other rules for the conduct of the business of the medical scheme; and
c) The provisions relating to the benefits which may be granted by and the contributions which may
become payable to the medical scheme
Critical Aspect s for GEMS as a
Medical Scheme
Scheme
Members
Contributions
Advisors o Scheme rules
Bank account
Actuaries o Registrar and
Auditors Benefit options Council
o Medical Schemes
Investment Claims
Act
Managed care
Administrators
Governance & Operational Structure
Governance , Direction & Oversight
Members
Employer
Employees
Board of Trustees Committees Support Services
Advisory,
Actuaries,
Auditors
Execution of Strategy & Investment
determination of Operational Principal Officer
deliverables Executive & Head Office
OUTSOURCED SERVICES
Performance of
Operational Administration Managed Care
Functions o Enrolment and Registration o Authorization Management
o Benefit Management and o Disease Management
Claims Payment o Claims Adjudication
o Member servicing (Contact
Centre Support).
Conceptualisation and establishment
“The state as an employer seeks to ensure that there is adequate provisioning of healthcare
coverage to public service employees that is efficient, cost-effective and equitable”
Registration (2005)
9%
8.7%
7.4%
R1 200 000,000
6%
per year
3%
0%
Open Schemes Closed Schemes GEMS Total
(excluding GEMS) (excluding GEMS)
Prioritising healthcare
The R1,2 billion saved on non-healthcare expenditure allows for more healthcare services to
be funded.
3 million consultations
with family practitioners
12 000 hospital
admissions
Scheme Statistics
2015
Principal Members 674,936
Beneficiaries 1,781,770
Eligible Members on GEMS 55%
Average Age 30.78
Level 1-5 46%
Average Family Size 2.64
Pensioner Ratio 13.70%
Claims Ratio 92.63%
• Hospital Spend 38.22%
Gross Contributions 28,139,221,000
Claims 25,539 ,196,000
Non Healthcare Cost 2,043,505,000
Major Utilisation Cost Drivers
Practice Type Cost Paid (R)
Medical Specialists 2 824 183 078
General Practitioners 1 925 785 906
Optometrist 529 751 877
Pathologists 1 488 219 231
Radiologist 975 135 470
Dentist 534 044 298
Supplementary & Allied Health Services 2 823 406 633
Emergency Medical Services (EMS) 287 282 331
Private Hospitals 9 606 324 013
Provincial hospitals 101 395 668
Medicines 4 346 497 705
10,000,000,000
8,000,000,000
6,000,000,000
4,000,000,000
5 : 51
2,000,000,000
0
0% - 5%
45% - 50%
65% - 70%
10% - 15%
15% - 20%
20% - 25%
25% - 30%
30% - 35%
35% - 40%
40% - 45%
50% - 55%
55% - 60%
60% - 65%
70% - 75%
75% - 80%
80% - 85%
85% - 90%
90% - 95%
5% - 10%
95% - 100%
Band of beneficiaries
Claims Ratio
2014 Claims ratio per family
1800%
1600% 79% of beneficiaries pay more than is claimed back in any given
year
1400%
1200%
1000%
800%
600%
79%
400%
200%
0%
Medical Plans/Options
Enrolment Criteria (Income Bands)
Sapphire and Beryl
Income Bands 2016 Contribution per Member
2015 2016 Sapphire Beryl
R0 - R6 860 R0 - R7 340 R776 R895
R6 861 - R9 625 R7 340.01 - R10 299 R813 R971
R9 626 - R16 490 R10 299.01 - R17 644 R864 R1 059
R16 491+ R17 644+ R961 R1270
Ruby and Emerald
Income Bands 2016 Contribution per Member
2015 2016 Ruby Emerald
R0 - R10 330 R0 – R11 053 R1 796 R1 996
R10 331 - R17 840 R11 053.01- R19 089 R2 000 R2 210
R17 841+ R19 089+ R2 224 R2 477
Onyx
Income Bands
2015 2016 2016 Contribution per Member
R0 - R10 330 R0 - R11 053 R3 193
R10 331 - R22 010 R11 053.01 – R23 551 R3 322
R22 011+ R23 551.01+ R3 587
Impact of no change in Subsidy
Sapphire 19% 1%
Beryl 16% 4%
Ruby 20% 7%
Emerald 21% 9%
Onyx 17% 11%
Total 20% 8%
Affordability
Influenza Pneumococcal
vaccinations vaccinations
GEMS is now participating in the Health Quality Assessment (HQA) – this is further
indication of the Scheme’s commitment to improving healthcare outcomes.
Disease Management Programmes
Diabetes 90 634
Hypertension 210 825
HIV 119 894
Mental Health 48 446
Oncology 11 133
Number of
The Funding Challenge
2014 Cost ratio examples
27
Chronic Renal Disease
3
HIV
3
Hypothyroidism
Hospital-centric Care is Dominant
10%
13%
38% 39%
43%
38%
19%
Hospital spend Hospital related spend Out of hospital spend Family Practitioners Specialists Hospitals Other
HIV programmes
Maternity programmes
- HIV/AIDS
Health Outcomes
% increase/decrease
Reduce by 5%
over previous year - -11% 4% -19% 5% -5%
per year
Pneumonia hospital
admissions
Reduce by 5%
% increase/decrease -22% -25% -20% -4% -17%
per year
over previous year - TB
hospital admissions
Partner to organs of state
Working together with government bodies and leading industry players to bring
about innovative methods and leading practices in healthcare to the ultimate
benefit of society.
Specialist networks
(obstetricians and paediatricians) Diabetes Back pain
GEMS has realised significant and sustained growth and is now the second largest medical
scheme in South Africa
9%
8.7%
7.4%
R1 200 000,000
6%
per year
3%
0%
Open Schemes Closed Schemes GEMS Total
(excluding GEMS) (excluding GEMS)
Balancing Sustainability with Social
Solidarity
GEMS has achieved solid financial results in the context of social solidarity.
No waiting periods
Income-related contributions
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
The proportion of claims classified as PMBs has increased significantly in recent years. In 2010, 60.7% of
expenditure was classified as a PMB. By 2015, 72.3% of expenditure was classified as a PMB. This
amounts to an increase of 19.0%.
100%
90%
80%
72% 72% 72%
70% 66%
61% 63%
% of expenditure
60%
50%
39% 37%
40% 34%
28% 28% 28%
30%
20%
10%
0%
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
PMB Non-PMB
In this context, PMBs refer to claims flagged as PMBs as well as potential PMB claims on according to ICD
10 codes. Pharmacy claims are not considered given their limited impact on Prescribed Minimum Benefits.
Disaggregating Trends
By discipline By diagnosis
% PMB
% PMB
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Increases are evident across provider types. Increases are evident across diagnosis categories.
Whether such substantial and consistent Whether such consistent increases across
increases can simply be attributed to variances in diagnoses is a function of changes in the mix of
the clinical characteristics of patients is diagnoses is questionable
questionable
Cost
R 1,800,000,000 R 90
11.5%
R 1,600,000,000 R 80 11.0%
R 1,400,000,000 R 70 10.5%
10.0%
R 1,200,000,000 R 60
9.5%
R 1,000,000,000 R 50
9.0%
R 800,000,000 R 40
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 8.5%
In 2011, payments in excess of tariff amounted to In 2011, the amount paid in excess of tariff was
R839 million. This increased by 22.2% per year to 9.2% of the PMB expenditure. By 2015, this had
R1,869 billion in 2015. increased to 11.4%.
Considerations
Potential for Way Forward