Venancio Concepcion, president of Philippine National Bank, authorized an extension of credit of P300,000 to Puno y Concepcion, S. en C. His wife owned half of Puno y Concepcion. Concepcion was found guilty of violating a law prohibiting bank directors from granting direct or indirect loans to themselves. The court ruled that the credit extension was a loan under the law and that discounts are a mode of loaning money, so the transaction was considered a loan.
Venancio Concepcion, president of Philippine National Bank, authorized an extension of credit of P300,000 to Puno y Concepcion, S. en C. His wife owned half of Puno y Concepcion. Concepcion was found guilty of violating a law prohibiting bank directors from granting direct or indirect loans to themselves. The court ruled that the credit extension was a loan under the law and that discounts are a mode of loaning money, so the transaction was considered a loan.
Venancio Concepcion, president of Philippine National Bank, authorized an extension of credit of P300,000 to Puno y Concepcion, S. en C. His wife owned half of Puno y Concepcion. Concepcion was found guilty of violating a law prohibiting bank directors from granting direct or indirect loans to themselves. The court ruled that the credit extension was a loan under the law and that discounts are a mode of loaning money, so the transaction was considered a loan.
1922 • Facts: Venancio Concepcion, President of Philippine National Bank, sent telegrams and a confirmation letter to the manager of the Aparri branch of PNB, authorizing an extension of credit in favor of Puno y Concepcion, S. en C. in the amount of P300,000.00. • The special authorization limited the discretional power of the local manager of the Aparri branch of grant loans and discount negotiable documents to P5,000, which in certain cases, in certain cases can be increase to P10,000. • Pursuant to the authorization, credit aggregating to P300,000 was granted to Puno y Concepcion, S. en C., the only security required consisting of six demand notes. • This Puno y Concepcion, S. en C., in reality is a co partnership capitalized in P100,000 wherein, Venancio Concepcion’s wife owns have of the co partnership. • Venancio Concepcion was found guilty by the CFI for violation of Section 354 of Act 2747 which provides that: “The National Bank shall not, directly or indirectly, grant loans to any member of the board of directors of the bank nor the agents of the branch banks”. • Issues • A) Whether or not the granting of a credit of P300,000 to the copartnership was a “loan” within the meaning of Section 35 of Act. No. 2747 • B) Whether or not the granting of a credit of P300,000 to the co partnership was a “loan” or a “discount” • Ruling • A) YES. The “credit” of an individual means his ability to borrow money by virtue of the confidence or trust reposed by a lender that he will pay what he may promise. A “loan” means the delivery by one party and the receipt by the other party of a given sum of money, upon an agreement, expressed or implied, to repay the sum loaned, with or without interest. The concession of a “credit” necessarily involving the granting of “loans” up to the limit of the amount fixed in the “credit”. • B) LOAN. Discounts are favored by bankers because of the liquid nature, growing, as they do, out of an actual, live, transaction. But in its analysis, to discount a paper is only a mode of loaning money, with, however, these distinctions: (1) In a discount, interest is deducted in advance, while in a loan, interest is taken at the expiration of a credit; (2) a discount is always on a double-name paper; a loan is generally on a single-name paper.
The 5 Elements of the Highly Effective Debt Collector: How to Become a Top Performing Debt Collector in Less Than 30 Days!!! the Powerful Training System for Developing Efficient, Effective & Top Performing Debt Collectors