Students have constitutional rights that carry onto school campuses. While schools have the right to determine enrollment, teaching, curriculum, and instruction, they cannot infringe on students' basic rights to due process, freedom of expression, and religious freedom. Schools must balance their own goals with protecting students' legal protections and granting them fair treatment in disciplinary hearings.
Students have constitutional rights that carry onto school campuses. While schools have the right to determine enrollment, teaching, curriculum, and instruction, they cannot infringe on students' basic rights to due process, freedom of expression, and religious freedom. Schools must balance their own goals with protecting students' legal protections and granting them fair treatment in disciplinary hearings.
Original Description:
Original Title
CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS OF STUDENTS INSIDE THE CAMPUS.pptx
Students have constitutional rights that carry onto school campuses. While schools have the right to determine enrollment, teaching, curriculum, and instruction, they cannot infringe on students' basic rights to due process, freedom of expression, and religious freedom. Schools must balance their own goals with protecting students' legal protections and granting them fair treatment in disciplinary hearings.
Students have constitutional rights that carry onto school campuses. While schools have the right to determine enrollment, teaching, curriculum, and instruction, they cannot infringe on students' basic rights to due process, freedom of expression, and religious freedom. Schools must balance their own goals with protecting students' legal protections and granting them fair treatment in disciplinary hearings.
protection and guarantee afforded by the 1987 Constitution to all persons under the Bill of Rights. These rights are carried by the student even upon entering the school campus or premises. As declared by our Supreme Court;
“x x x (The students) enjoy like the rest of
the citizens the freedom x x x. They do not borrow from the opinion of Justice Fortas in Tinker v. Moines Community School District. ‘shed their constitutional rights x x x at the school gate.’ x x x” The parallels of constitutional liberties which should exist for students on campus are not easy for school administrators to accept. As stated by Rev. Fr. Joaquin G. Bernas, S. J., in his comment on the proposed bill on the “Magana Carta for Students” “What is usually said is that a student does not leave his constitutional rights at the gate of a school. He takes them into the school.
This is true, but constitutional rights
outside the school and constitutional rights in the school are merely analogous, not univocal. The rights outside the school are those enjoyed by everyone within a society that is open to and intended for everyone.
A school, however, is a specialized
society with narrowly drawn goals. Only those who agree with the goals of the school are expected to enroll. THE FOUR PILLARS OF ACADEMIC FREEDOM OF SCHOOLS:
1. The right to decide who may enroll
2. The right to decide who may teach 3. The right to decide what will be taught 4. The right to decide how teaching is to be carried on. As rejoinder to the above position professed by school owners, is the argument that the legal rights of ownership are insufficient basis for them to determine freely what policies should be put into effect in an educational institution. It is even stressed that the application of these Constitutional rights to students in private educational institutions is justified by three basic theories: 1. Attempts to treat the action in question of the private school as “state action” under the Constitution 2. Contract theories under which the school has, trough written or unwritten agreements, bound itself to recognize certain rights of the student 3. Common law rights theories concerning private associations. On several occasions the Supreme Court also ruled categorically that the legitimate exercise of rights by the students within the school grounds cannot be the basis of the school for punishing students or deny their re-admission. As long as his liberty or property is at stake, as student is entitled to due processes regardless of the extent or severity of the deprivation--- unless the deprivation is merely “de minimus.” It is therefore recognized that “(s)chool officials and academic personnel shall have the right to impose appropriate and reasonable disciplinary measures in case of minor offenses or infractions of good discipline committed in their presence. However, when a student commits a serious offense that entails the imposition of a severe administrative penalty, he must first be accorded due process. There is no justification for the denial thereof, not even offense was committed in the presence of faculty members or other school authorities. The nature of the due process required should vary with the nature of the case. Factors that must be considered are the seriousness of the liberty or property deprivations, the kind of procedures that are most appropriate to deciding the issues at hand, and the administrative burden. The basic aim is to minimize the risk of erroneous decisions. The Court laid down these minimum standards that must be met to satisfy the demands of procedural due process in student disciplinary hearings:
1. The students must be informed in writing
of the nature and cause of any accusation against them;
2. They shall have the right to answer the
charges against them, with the assistance of counsel, if desired: 3. They shall be informed of the evidence against them;
4. They shall have the right to adduce
evidence in their own behalf: and
5. The evidence must be considered by
the investigating committee or official designated by the school authorities to hear and decide the case. Students facing suspension, exclusion or expulsion and the consequent with protected property interest must be given some kind of notice and afforded some kind of hearing in accordance with the minimum requirements. In case of dismissal due to academic deficiency, the school is not obliged to observe the Guzman requirements. Of all human rights, religious freedom is entitled to the highest priority and the amplest protection for it involves the relationship of man with his Creator.
Schools therefore cannot promulgate
rules prohibiting students from exercising their freedom of religion or force them o follow school rules against their religious belief. The school authorities adopt a policy of total ban on campus fraternities and sororities, the school will have to prove that the organization in question undermines the school’s legitimate goals and the welfare of its students. CHED Memorandum order No. 97 (22 August 1995) requires all heads of private Higher Education Institutions to submit to the CHED a list of all fraternities/sororities and/or student organizations officially registered with their institutions and the corresponding members thereof. DECS/ CHED Orders on Recognition of Student Associations/ Organizations/ Fraternities and/or Sororities (1.) Relative to Student Associations/ Organizations
Students in these institutions desiring
to participate in student organizations on campus shall do as right, in return for recognition by affiliation with and/or support from the respective institutions. It is understood that organizations that exist or operate outside of the system of school recognition shall continue to be governed by the law. (2) Relative to Student Councils
Student councils shall have the right to
determine their policies and programs on student activities, in accordance with the provisions of their recognized constitutions or charters.
Each institution shall make available to the
student council, from fees collected for the purpose or from other appropriate funds, in accordance with an income and expenditures budget for the semester or school year, as the case may be. (3) Relative to Fraternities/Sororities
a. Establishment and Regulation of
Fraternities and Sororities
It shall be the responsibility of the
school head to supervise and regulate the operations as well as activities of all duly recognized student organizations, for the purpose of directing as well as maximizing the utilization of their resource and efforts. Each student organization shall have a constitution and by-laws which shall be approved upon recommendation of the Dean of Students, by the school head. No such student organization shall be allowed to function in a school without prior approval as required. b. Preventive Measures Against Violence and Sanctions on Fraternities and Other School Organizations
All educational institutions of higher
learning are encouraged to promote programs and projects that will produce responsible students and will instill the value of human life for a productive future. a. Authorization for Students Assemblies Prior written approval of school authorities in the form of a permit shall be necessary before any student assembly is held or announced. b. Conduct of Student Assemblies It shall be the responsibility and the duty of the leaders or organizers of the student assembly to adopt all measures and to take all steps necessary to ensure a peaceful student assembly (f) Right to Privacy
The doctrine established by the US
Supreme Court in the celebrated case may be the basis for school authorities/ administrators in determining the extent of their authority to search and/or seize personal belongings of students brought inside the school campus considering the right of said students to privacy. The school setting requires some easing of the restrictions to which ordinary searches by public authorities are performed. (a) Right to Counseling
Counseling is concerned with
assisting a student in understanding and evaluating his potentialities and in discovering and developing ways and means of working out his problems and taking full advantage of his opportunities. (b) Right to Access to and Confidentiality of Records The right of access to records is an individual right, which means a right conferred by the law upon the student only. In the case, however, of a student of minor age, the right may be exercised by his parents or legal guardian. It should be note however , that not all student records are subject to the rule of confidentiality. The categories of school records are classified: (1)Classified or Strictly Confidential Records
This refers to records of the student
submitted in pursuance of the “special relationship” it has with school. That is, information disclosed to the school, for the latter’s use only for admission and or promotion purpose and no other. (2)Unclassified or Non-Confidential Records
These are other school records and
documents not covered by the first category. Records that should necessarily be made public to enable the State (government) and students or parents determine legal existence and operation of the school and assess its performance. (3)Forms 137 and 138
These are two very important student
records: the transfer credentials (Form 138) and the Transcript of Records (Form 137). It should be noted that therefore, that the transfer credentials should not be released if student still has financial or property obligations to the school. (4)Issues Raised in Handling of School Records Questions: 1. May a student record be released to a company with whom he has filed an application for a job? 2. May the grades of the students be posted n the school door or bulletin boards? 3. May the spouse of a student request for latter’s records in school without his/her consent? 4. May the records released to another school upon transfer of a student, particularly the TOR, include the release of disciplinary records? (c) Right to BE Free From Involuntary Contributions
May private schools solicit and
receive contributions or donations from students or their parents? THANK YOU!