Presented by [Marriam Musa Regional Education Manager]

Mid Year Review 2017-2018

1
Gratitude
 Departmental Mission Statement

“The mission of TCF is to enable and create

opportunities to moral, spiritual and intellectual
enlightenment to improve quality of life.
A TCF student should embody the five Cs
(Conceptual Knowledge, Communication, Creativity
and Critical thinking, Confidence and Core Values)
that set her/him apart.

3
Departmental Organogram
Officer Education

AEM Lahore-I

AEM-Lahore-II

Lahore-III

AEM Gujranwala
Regional Education Manager
AEM Faisalabad

AEM Jhang

AEM Bahawalpur

AEM Muzaffargarh

AEM Khanewal

4
Goals / KPIs for 2017-2018

1. Quality of 2. Teachers Content

3. Matric Result
Principals Knowledge

4. APR 5. School Visits

5
 1. Quality of Principals
No Action Plan Timelines Weight R A C I Progress till Mid-Year

1 • Weak principals have

been identified & NI
Frequent visits by principals replaced or
AM & AEM to: are in the process of
• Monitor and being replaced.
build capacity • Better understanding
AM AM
• Align goals On going Very High REM RM of curriculum
AEM AEM
• Inculcate implementation &
positive growth effective lesson
mindsets planning
• On going discussions
about harmony and
open communication
2 A positive response
noted following frequent
Holding regular AM interaction and
On going High AM AEM RM
principal meetings AEM REM motivation provided by
the Area & Regional
Teams
1 Gradual improvement in
Preset PA and AM AM
Apr/July High RM principals is observed in
INSET AEM AEM REM
most cases

6
 PQI SCORE
100%

90%

80%

70%
61% 63%
59%
60% 57% 60%

50%

40%

30%

20%

10%

0%
North North West South South West

7
 AREAS - PQI SCORE
100%

90%

80%

70% 65% 64%

61% 63% 62%
59%
60% 54% 54% 61%

50%

40%

30%

20%

10%

0%
Bahawalpur Faislabad Gujaranwala Jhang Khanewal Lahore-I Lahore-II Muzaffargarh
North

8
 2. Teachers’ content knowledge
90%

80% 80%
72% 77%
70%

60% 54%
50%

40%

30%

20%

10%

0%
2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017

Source: SMS year wise trend to be displayed

9
TCF has opened 1060 Schools educating 165,000 children in the poorest parts of 109 towns and cities across Pakistan.
 Teachers Content Knowledge
N Action Plan Timelines Weight R A C I Progress till Mid-Year
o

1 Motivation & Gold and silver medalists were

Encouragement given medals in school
On going Very High AM/AEM AM/AEM REM assemblies. The principals were
RM
appreciated at area level as
well.

2 Jan-Feb-
Mock Tests AEM/AM/ AEM Planned & executed with item
April-May Very High AM/AEM RM
during SDDs Principal REM analysis done on area level.
2016/17

3
High scorers are made in
charge of guiding the new
Peer Teaching On going High Principal AM/AEM REM RM inductees/weak staff members.
In single unit schools, the high
scorers/principal will help out.

10
3. Matric Result
881
817

617 629

497

95 92 94 94 94.55
46 34 42 44 54

2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17

Pass % A/A+ % Students appeared

11
 Mid Term Exams APR% Class- IX and X-2017-18
80 78

70
66
62 63 63 63 62
59
60 57 57 57
55
52 53
49 49
50 46

40 38

30

20

10

0
LAHORE-I LAHORE-II GUJRANWALA FAISALABAD JHANG KHANEWAL MUZAFFARGARH BAHAWALPUR REGION APR

APR% - IX APR% - X

12
Vocational Matric Result

122

105
89.34
80.95

64.7

45.87

2015-16 2016-17

Pass % A/A+ % Students appeared

13
 MATRIC RESULTS
No Action Plan Timelines Weight R A C I Progress till Mid-Year

1 Revision plan & Dec to March Very High AM/ AM/AEM REM RM Completed
test schedule AEM
implemented.
2 Summer Camp July 2016 High AM/ AM/AEM REM RM Completed
AEM
3 Centralized Half October 2016 Very High AM/ AM/AEM REM RM Average Result
Yearly Exams AEM

4 Conduction of Dec 2016 High AM AM/AEM REM RM Completed

Winter Camp /AEM

5 Preliminary February 2017 Very High AM AM/AEM REM RM Average Result

Exams /AEM

6 Use of SABAQ On going High AM/ AM/AEM REM RM Satisfactory

tutorials & AEM
completion of
practical copies
7 Target Setting December Very High AM/ AM/AEM REM RM Completed
AEM Principal
Principal

14
4. APR
APR Actual vs Target
70%
60% 60% 60% 61% 63%
60% 57% 56% 57% 57% 56% 57%
50%
50%

40%

30%

20%

10%

0%
2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-18 YTD
Target Actual

Source: SMS

15
 APR
No Action Plan Timelines Weight R A C I Progress till Mid-Year

1
Motivation and On going Very High AM AM AEM REM RM Satisfactory
guidance to focus AEM
on SIP

2 Realistic target (Revised in) High AM

setting by November AEM AM AEM REM RM Reasonable
Principals & Area 2016
Teams
4 Focus on proper Very High
syllabus coverage AM AM AEM REM RM Average
to generate a In progress AEM
reasonable APR

5 Aligning class In progress Very high

assessments and Ts AM AM AEM REM RM All AEMs have
with centralized AEM communicated these
exam pattern – messages, given
Independence/crea guidance on how to
tivity/critical ensure implementation
thinking and have assigned
targets

16
5. Average Visit / School / Month

Source: SMS year wise trend to be displayed

17
Average Visit / School / Month

Part of month
Month Dates Days to be counted counted Weighted Target Days on EDUCATIONAL visit

Oct 25th onwards 7 22.58% 1.81 2

Nov complete 30 100.00% 8.00 6

December complete 31 100.00% 8.00 10

January 15-Jan 15 48.39% 3.87 5

83 21.68 23

5.8
5.7
5.6
5.5
5.4
5.3
5.2
Weighted Actual Days
Target Days on Visit
on visit
Source: SMS

18
5. Average Visit / School / Month
Graph to show Average Visit / E-Compound

Source: SMS year wise trend to be displayed

19
 Ensuring the quantity and quality of
AEM school visits
Action Plan Timelines Weight R A C I Progress till Mid-Year

1 Submission of
tentative visit All AEMs submit their
plans before the monthly plans and most
start of the month On going High AEM AEM REM of them give updates
REM
when they deviate from
that plan

2 Assignment of As the REM visits each

specific targets area, the visit forms
on education Very filled by AEMs are
On going AEM AEM REM
forms High REM checked and
constructive feedback is
given
3 Regular follow-up
on visits Very
On going AEM AM REM RM On going
High

20
Overall Initiatives Taken – July 2017 Onwards

Initiative Description

Motivation of Students/ • Extensive visits

• Sessions with students on their personality development and
Staff
character building

Focus on critical thinking • Principals have been instructed to ask H.O questions from
and creativity students when they address them in classrooms
• Lead schools where students classwork represents their
own thought processes
Pedagogical feedback to • After conducting classroom observations, teachers and
teachers principal are given in depth feedback of pedagogical areas
of improvement
Effective Communication • Conference Calls

21
Key Challenges Faced – July 2016 Onwards

Challenge Description / Steps taken to overcome Challenge

Immersing into the system Joined on 10th October. Still grasping

Students - 5 Cs Alignment of the idea of quality of education,

Steps to overcome: Regional meeting, principal meetings,
school visits
Whole School Index All components are given special attention and strategies are
designed to improve them
Education team alignment Setting team norms, slight change in direction.
and goal setting

22
 Recommendations (Ideas)
• Activities designed on each core value in the TG for each class

• Instead of spending so many days on Math Olympiad, an SST

competition could also be organized to promote active citizenship,

confidence and critical thinking

• Use of google docs at least at managerial level

23
Focus Areas

TCT &
Quality of
Pedagogical 5 Cs
Principals
Skills of teachers

APR (including
School Visits
matric)

24