Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 20 views

    Ar Gu Ment: "I've Had An Argument With My Father"

    Uploaded by

    Jæ Əm
    This document outlines an introduction to philosophy session on doing philosophy through arguments. It defines what an argument is and discusses the concepts of valid versus sound arguments. It provides examples of valid and invalid arguments. It also introduces the concepts of necessary and sufficient conditions. The document encourages reviewing an online video for additional information on evaluating arguments.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Ar Gu Ment: "I've Had An Argument With My Father"

    Uploaded by

    Jæ Əm
    20 views26 pages
    This document outlines an introduction to philosophy session on doing philosophy through arguments. It defines what an argument is and discusses the concepts of valid versus sound arguments. It provides examples of valid and invalid arguments. It also introduces the concepts of necessary and sufficient conditions. The document encourages reviewing an online video for additional information on evaluating arguments.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    intro+phil+session+3+arguments.pptx

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document outlines an introduction to philosophy session on doing philosophy through arguments. It defines what an argument is and discusses the concepts of valid versus sound arguments. It provides examples of valid and invalid arguments. It also introduces the concepts of necessary and sufficient conditions. The document encourages reviewing an online video for additional information on evaluating arguments.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
    20 views26 pages

    Ar Gu Ment: "I've Had An Argument With My Father"

    Uploaded by

    Jæ Əm
    This document outlines an introduction to philosophy session on doing philosophy through arguments. It defines what an argument is and discusses the concepts of valid versus sound arguments. It provides examples of valid and invalid arguments. It also introduces the concepts of necessary and sufficient conditions. The document encourages reviewing an online video for additional information on evaluating arguments.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
    of 26

    Introduction to Philosophy

    Session 3
    Doing Philosophy: Arguments

    ar·gu·ment
    noun
    1.1.
    an exchange of diverging or opposite views, typically a heated or angry one.
    "I've had an argument with my father"
    2.2.
    a reason or set of reasons given with the aim of persuading others that an action or
    idea is right or wrong.
    "there is a strong argument for submitting a formal appeal"
    Introduction to Philosophy
    Session 3
    Doing Philosophy: Arguments

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cum3k-
    Wglfw&list=PLtKNX4SfKpzX_bhh4LOEWEGy3pk
    LmFDmk&index=1
    Introduction to Philosophy
    Session 3
    Doing Philosophy: Arguments

    VALID ARGUMENT
    If premises are true, conclusion is true
    Introduction to Philosophy
    Session 3
    Doing Philosophy: Arguments

    Premise 1: You are either hungry or tired


    Premise 2: You are not hungry
    Conclusion: You are tired
    Introduction to Philosophy
    Session 3
    Doing Philosophy: Arguments

    Premise 1: All men are mortal


    Premise 2: Socrates is a man
    Conclusion: Socrates is mortal
    Introduction to Philosophy
    Session 3
    Doing Philosophy: Arguments

    Premise 1: All students are smart


    Premise 2: Jennifer is a student
    Conclusion: Jennifer is smart
    Introduction to Philosophy
    Session 3
    Doing Philosophy: Arguments

    Premise 1: Some students are smart


    Premise 2: Jennifer is a student
    Conclusion: Jennifer is smart
    Introduction to Philosophy
    Session 3
    Doing Philosophy: Arguments

    Premise 1: Jennifer is a student


    Premise 2: Jennifer is smart
    Conclusion: All students are smart
    Introduction to Philosophy
    Session 3
    Doing Philosophy: Arguments

    Premise 1: Peter is made of oatmeal


    Premise 2: Oatmeal is an animal
    Premise 3: All animals are yellow
    Premise 4: Yellow is the same as green
    Conclusion: Peter is green
    Introduction to Philosophy
    Session 3
    Doing Philosophy: Arguments

    Premise 1: A is made of B
    Premise 2: B is C
    Premise 3: All C is f
    Premise 4: f is the same as g
    Conclusion: A is g
    Introduction to Philosophy
    Session 3
    Doing Philosophy: Arguments

    Premise 1: 7 is more than 2


    Premise 2: McDonalds sells burgers
    Conclusion: Brooklyn is part of New York City
    Introduction to Philosophy
    Session 3
    Doing Philosophy: Arguments

    Premise 1: A is more than B


    Premise 2: C sells D
    Conclusion: E is part of F
    Introduction to Philosophy
    Session 3
    Doing Philosophy: Arguments

    SOUND ARGUMENT
    A valid argument with true premises
    Introduction to Philosophy
    Session 3
    Doing Philosophy: Arguments

    Premise 1: You are either hungry or tired


    Premise 2: You are not hungry
    Conclusion: You are tired
    Introduction to Philosophy
    Session 3
    Doing Philosophy: Arguments

    Premise 1: All men are mortal


    Premise 2: Socrates is a man
    Conclusion: Socrates is mortal
    Introduction to Philosophy
    Session 3
    Doing Philosophy: Arguments

    Premise 1: All students are smart


    Premise 2: Jennifer is a student
    Conclusion: Jennifer is smart
    Introduction to Philosophy
    Session 3
    Doing Philosophy: Arguments

    Premise 1: Some students are smart


    Premise 2: Jennifer is a student
    Conclusion: Jennifer is smart
    Introduction to Philosophy
    Session 3
    Doing Philosophy: Arguments

    Premise 1: Jennifer is a student


    Premise 2: Jennifer is smart
    Conclusion: All students are smart
    Introduction to Philosophy
    Session 3
    Doing Philosophy: Arguments

    Premise 1: Peter is made of oatmeal


    Premise 2: Oatmeal is an animal
    Premise 3: All animals are yellow
    Premise 4: Yellow is the same as green
    Conclusion: Peter is green
    Introduction to Philosophy
    Session 3
    Doing Philosophy: Arguments

    Premise 1: A is made of B
    Premise 2: B is C
    Premise 3: All C is f
    Premise 4: f is the same as g
    Conclusion: A is g
    Introduction to Philosophy
    Session 3
    Doing Philosophy: Arguments

    Premise 1: 7 is more than 2


    Premise 2: McDonalds sells burgers
    Conclusion: Brooklyn is part of New York City
    Introduction to Philosophy
    Session 3
    Doing Philosophy: Arguments

    Premise 1: A is more than B


    Premise 2: C sells D
    Conclusion: E is part of F
    Introduction to Philosophy
    Session 3
    Doing Philosophy: Arguments
    Introduction to Philosophy
    Session 3
    Doing Philosophy: Arguments
    Introduction to Philosophy
    Session 3
    Doing Philosophy: Arguments

    NECESSARY CONDITION
    Q is true only if P is true

    SUFFICIENT CONDITION
    If R is true, then S is true
    Introduction to Philosophy
    Session 3
    Doing Philosophy: Arguments

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9uOF3AZI_Gc&list=PLtKNX4SfKpzX_bhh4
    LOEWEGy3pkLmFDmk&index=8

    You might also like