Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction To SG - October 2009
Introduction To SG - October 2009
• Recommended maximum
length: 1 line
A software tool developed by the Institute comprising
• A healthcare demand model
• A representation of a whole health and social care delivery
system based on pathways of care
• A powerful simulation facility
Simulation
Will it work?
it’s too risky
to test live Will it impact
How might
demand elsewhere in
change over our system?
time?
What is the
optimum
cost /
capacity
Model trade-off?
of
care
Simulation does not predict
but
however
activity and cost data from SG it was possible The pathway model was then applied to their
to predict the numbers of staff required by
location and their costs. Testing capacity plans PCT communities, taking into account
current resources and activity. Scenarios
demonstrating beneficial outcome from
thrombolysis, specialist stroke units and
early supported discharge were well
Care pathways (incl. received and used to support business
cases for introduction of the new services
East Riding of Yorkshire PCT modelled the
activity and costs arising from falls and falls, stroke, major
compared current provision with a
proposed new service that includes an
ambulance diversionary pathway to reduce
trauma)
Greenwich PCT has an annual population
hospital admissions, and three tiers of growth of 1.2%, high birth rate & inward
preventative and rehabilitatory assessment. migration, high admission rates, and above
They were able to investigate the impact of
the ageing population, to compare
Remodelling average outpatients. They wanted to
explore implications for their own PCT of
scenarios of various degrees of success in
diverting cases from A&E as a result of the unscheduled care, the Healthcare for London plan, in
particular to anticipate polyclinic activity.
diversionary pathway and to identify the
costs and activity of the various steps in the
existing and new pathway. This aided
admission avoidance 10 year simulations were run using the
generic healthcare model with local
understanding of the proposed pathway configuration, comparing scenarios from
and its patient flows; enabled them to
demonstrate the potential benefit of Polyclinics London Plan.
implementing various aspects of the falls SG helped the PCT to test assumptions in
pathway, to identify the likely workforce the London Plan and assess the
consequences, make sounder investment consequences for their PCT. It caused
plans and have greater confidence in the them to question the volume of polyclinic
business planning and commissioning of activity, its impact on care pathways and its
the new elements of the service affordability
Functional model
Results include:
Changes to: •Activity & cost for each step
•Population •Average & peak capacity
•Demography •Transaction time
•Prevalence Scenarios •Queues
Changes to:
Events •Referral
patterns
•Capacity
Population Mental Health •Duration
Urgent Whole
Demographic Simulation
weighting system results
Planned model
Prevalence Maternity
Service Pathway
points, flows Constrained
& waits models resources
Pathway display
How Scenario Generator Can examine activity across
supports the WCC the whole healthcare delivery
system locally and how it
Commissioning Cycle might respond to changing Allows multiple scenarios
demand or to different service of changing demand or
models. SG has a visual service delivery to be
pathway modeller that allows modelled and compared.
Can review demand existing and proposed new
arising from changing These can be used to
services to be mapped. test/check assumptions in
population and disease proposed service models
prevalence (population
growth is modelled)
SG can be used as a communication tool, provides a SG incorporates tariff costs of services in support of
consolidated whole-system view of the health and social care investment planning. It supports process mapping,
economy, offers a transparent way of developing and sharing predictive modelling, what if scenarios, simulation, service
service models costing, strategic planning.
SG provides a common platform on which to share service SG can map current service provision, models and
models between community partners thereby increasing simulates the impact of commissioning decisions and
knowledge transfer strategies on current provision, increases understanding
of the local system.
3. Engage with public and patients 8. Promote improvement and innovation
SG is a powerful tool for sharing new service model
proposals with clinicians, other staff and patient groups, it
4. Collaborate with clinicians offers transparency since assumptions are clearly
identified and models can be used to inform service
Being based on clinical pathways, the service delivery models specifications. New ideas for service redesign can be
are easily understood by clinicians and managers. SG is a modelled and simulated very quickly.
powerful tool for increasing clinical engagement when used as
a part of a multi-disciplinary planning process 9. Secure procurement skills
SG can reduce risk of failure of contracts through
5. Manage knowledge and assess needs better understanding and communication of the
desired service through prior modelling and
SG is a powerful modelling and simulation environment tailored simulation.
to the needs of healthcare strategic planning. It has a
population and disease modelling component and a service 10. Manage the local health system
delivery model based on pathways of care. It provides
analytical rigour to process mapping and whole-system
performance, supports a comprehensive map of local service
provision and analysis of current and future population trends. 11. Make sound financial investments
SG supports predictive modelling, process mapping, scenario SG provides an analysis of the overall cost of
planning and needs analysis delivering modelled services, to better inform financial
analyses of new services.
BCBV metrics
Opportunity Locator Role for Scenario Generator
Priority Selector
… & other Institute products
Finding
quick wins
Planning Engaging /
Marketing
Measurement for
Thinking Envisioning Improvement Monitoring
Differently
The ‘Plan Do Study Act’ of Modelling
Define
problem
Design
Select initial
approaches model
80% of the
Develop
benefit of
concept simulation Validate
DoDo
other is in this
analyses
analyses
process
P
Refine A D Simulate
Draw
S
conclusions
Consult
Act upon
outputs
How to set about using Scenario
Generator
simulation@institute.nhs.uk
www.institute.nhs.uk/scenariogenerator
www.scenario-generator.com
Some case studies ...
Case Study: East Riding PCT
Falls and Osteoporosis Pathway
Benefits
• aid understanding of the proposed pathway and its patient flows;
• demonstrate the potential benefit of implementing various aspects of
the falls pathway;
• identify the likely workforce consequences;
• provide an indication of current costs of falls and the likely cost
savings as a consequence of the new pathway
• greater confidence in the business planning and commissioning of
the new elements of the service
• application of Scenario Generator to other initiatives in which new
models of care are being developed (unscheduled care strategy)
Case Study: Modelling a polyclinic
ala Healthcare for London
For inpatients
41% of future activity will take place in major acute hospitals
20% in elective care centres
29% in local hospitals
10% of admissions managed at home or no longer commissioned
Baseline Intervention
Activity Cost Activity Cost
Inpatient Strokes acute costs (+ early rehab) 375 £937,500 374 £935,000
Maximum acute bed occupancy 16
Thrombolysis add costs @ 4% ischaemic 0 £0 15 £12,210
Baseline of Rehabilitation
Activity ALOS Est bed days Max bed occupancy
Stroke unit rehabilitation 140 22 3080 13
Other rehabilitation 171 26 4446 20
7526 33
Early supported discharge team in place
Activity ALOS Est bed days Max bed occupancy
Stroke unit rehabilitation 186 22 4092 14
Other rehabilitation 38 26 988 7
Early supported discharge 85
Reduction in average bed days: 2400
Outcomes
Baseline Intervention Reduction
Expected institutionalisation 65 55 -15%
Expected early deaths after treatment 87 80 -8%
Baseline Intervention
Activity Cost Activity Cost
Inpatient Strokes acute costs (+ early rehab) 501 £1,252,500 501 £1,252,500
Maximum acute bed occupancy 20
Thrombolysis add costs @ 4% ischaemic 0 £0 14 £11,396
Baseline of Rehabilitation
Activity ALOS Est bed days Max bed occupancy
Stroke unit rehabilitation 224 22 4928 16
Other rehabilitation 184 26 4784 22
Total 9712 38
Outcomes
Baseline Intervention Reduction
Expected institutionalisation 89 72 -19%
Expected early deaths after treatment 107 101 -6%