Applying Logic and Fallacies in Determining Truth From

You might also like

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 10

Applying Logic and Fallacies in

determining Truth from Option


Logic- is the study of reasoning, or the study of the
principles and criteria of valid inference and
demonstration. It attempts to distinguish good
reasoning from bad reasoning.
Fallacies- are mistakes of reasoning, as opposed to
making mistakes that are of a factual nature. This is a
mistake of reasoning, and a fallacy, since I should not
have believed something inconsistent if my reasoning
is good. In some discussion, a fallacy is taken to be an
undesirable kind of argument or inference.
Truth- the quality or state of being true.
Option- a thing that is or may be chosen.
At the beginning of Tractatus, Ludwig Wittgenstein speaks of
the picture that we can form of reality, and in which, by way
of a model, we represent the existence and non existence of
state of affairs.
Ludwig Josef Johann Wittgenstein was an Austrian philosopher who
worked primarily in logic, the philosophy of mathematics, the
philosophy of mind, and the philosophy of language. From 1929 to
1947, Wittgenstein taught at the University of Cambridge.
Born: 26 April 1889, Vienna, Austria
Died: 29 April 1951, Cambridge, United Kingdom
Tractatus identifies the relationship
between language and reality and to
define the limits of science. It is
recognized as a significant philosophical
work of the twentieth century. It is in the
possibility of agreeing or disagreeing with
reality, thus being true or false, that the
meaning of the picture lies.
The same thoughts occur later when
Wittgenstein describes spoken and written
language, that is, propositions, as one of these
pictures and defines its meaning in terms of its
capacity for being true or false. The limits of
what can be said, therefore, are defined by the
logical rules. The logic of language shows how
elements fit states of affairs in wider
constellations can be linked together; we can
decide on the basis of this logic.
Moreover, Wittgenstein argues that the world
consists of states of affairs not of things. These
constellations can be reproduced in a picture,
rather as a course of events in a car accident for
example, it might be retracted in a court of law by
use of models. It is a case projection in a picture,
says Wittgenstein. Wittgenstein also stated that
everyday language reproduces actual situations
but there are extremely complicated and often
opaque when seen through an impure use of
words.
Over the years, in an author’s view, the purpose of
news reporting and journalism had irrevocably
changed. If the purpose of a sentence is to inform
or state a fact, some of its words must refer to
things, events or properties. In other words, some
of its words must refer to things , events or
properties. In other words some of its words have
cognitive meaning. However, words also have
emotive meaning.
• Cognitive meaning is related to cognition which
means the mental action or process of acquiring
knowledge and understanding through thought,
experience, and the senses".
• Emotive meaning sometimes called “the slanting of
language,” is described with examples and exercises.
... Emotive words are words that carry
emotional overtones. These words are said to
have emotive significance, emotive
meaning or emotional impact. The language is
sometimes described as being loaded.
Con artists take advantage of the emotive side of
language in two very important ways. First, they use
emotive meaning masked as cognitive meaning to
whip up emotions so that reasons gets overlooked.
Secondly, they use emotively neutral terms of
euphemisms to dull the force of what they say and
thus, make acceptable what otherwise might not be.
The fallacy of the use of emotional words happens
when one carefully employs words and images that are
heavy with emotional connotations in order to secure
the sympathies of others.
THANK YOU FOR LISTENING

You might also like