The document discusses several logical fallacies:
1. Relative privation - comparing a situation to the best or worst case to make it appear better or worse.
2. Righteousness fallacy - assuming someone has the facts on their side just because their intentions are good.
3. Scapegoating - unfairly blaming someone else to ignore the real problem, which can be done individually or in groups.
4. Shoehorning - force-fitting current events to fit one's personal agenda.
5. Tokenism - interpreting a token gesture as an adequate substitute for meaningful action.
The document discusses several logical fallacies:
1. Relative privation - comparing a situation to the best or worst case to make it appear better or worse.
2. Righteousness fallacy - assuming someone has the facts on their side just because their intentions are good.
3. Scapegoating - unfairly blaming someone else to ignore the real problem, which can be done individually or in groups.
4. Shoehorning - force-fitting current events to fit one's personal agenda.
5. Tokenism - interpreting a token gesture as an adequate substitute for meaningful action.
The document discusses several logical fallacies:
1. Relative privation - comparing a situation to the best or worst case to make it appear better or worse.
2. Righteousness fallacy - assuming someone has the facts on their side just because their intentions are good.
3. Scapegoating - unfairly blaming someone else to ignore the real problem, which can be done individually or in groups.
4. Shoehorning - force-fitting current events to fit one's personal agenda.
5. Tokenism - interpreting a token gesture as an adequate substitute for meaningful action.
better or worse by comparing it to the best or worst case scenario. Example: Son: I am so excited! I got an “A” on my physics exam! Dad: Why not an “A+”? This means that you answered something incorrectly . That is not acceptable! Righteousness Fallacy
- assuming that just because a
person’s intentions are good, they have the truth or facts on their side. Example: The president wants to bomb that country because he thinks they are preparing to launch a nuclear attack against us. I know the president wants to do the right thing for the good of the American people, so if he says there have nukes, they have nukes! Scapegoating
- refers to a process by which a
person or group is unfairly blamed for something that they didn’t do and, as a result, the real source of the problem is either never seen or purposefully ignored. The are four different ways in which scapegoating takes place and scapegoats are created: 1. Scapegoating can be a one-on-one phenomenon. Example: I know I got drunk, slapped the waitress on the behind, then urinated in the parking lot from inside the restaurant, but that was Satan who had a hold of me. 2. Scapegoating also occurs in a one-on-group manner. Example: The leader is blaming his group member because they got a low grade which in fact he is the one who is irresponsible. 3. Sometimes scapegoating takes a group-on-one. Example: Members of a sports team blame a player who made a mistake for the loss of a match. 4. Scapegoating that is group-on-group. Example: Section A blames section B for their lost books. Shoehorning - the process of force-fitting some current affair into one's personal, political, or religious agenda. Many people aren't aware of how easy it is to make something look like confirmation of a claim after the fact, especially if the source of the confirmation is something in which they already believe, like Biblical prophecies, psychic predictions, astrological horoscopes, fortune cookies, and more. Example: After the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon on September 11, 2001, fundamentalist Christian evangelists Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson shoehorned the events to their agenda. They claimed "liberal civil liberties groups, feminists, homosexuals and abortion rights supporters bear partial responsibility...because their actions have turned God's anger against America." According to Falwell, God allowed "the enemies of America...to give us probably what we deserve." Robertson agreed. The American Civil Liberties Union has "got to take a lot of blame for this," said Falwell and Robertson agreed. Federal courts bear part of the blame, too, said Falwell, because they've been "throwing God out of the public square." Also, "abortionists have got to bear some burden for this because God will not be mocked," said Falwell and Robertson agreed. Tokenism
- interpreting a token gesture as an
adequate substitute for the real thing. Example:
The presidential nominee has
been accused of being racist. But he recently stated that he really liked the movie, “Roots,” so I guess he isn’t racist.