This document discusses effective assessment practices and presents a framework for designing effective assessment. It covers 4 topics:
1. Categorizing effective assessment practices such as anecdotal, systematic, and formal assessments.
2. Core principles of effective assessment including enhancing learning, clear expectations, authentic tasks, and choice.
3. Repositioning the role of assessment so it guides students' approaches rather than being an afterthought.
4. A 16-point framework for effective assessment design that ensures alignment between objectives, teaching, and assessment. The framework recognizes the multiple roles assessment plays in the learning process.
Original Description:
Describes a framework for developing approaches to assessing examination answers.
This document discusses effective assessment practices and presents a framework for designing effective assessment. It covers 4 topics:
1. Categorizing effective assessment practices such as anecdotal, systematic, and formal assessments.
2. Core principles of effective assessment including enhancing learning, clear expectations, authentic tasks, and choice.
3. Repositioning the role of assessment so it guides students' approaches rather than being an afterthought.
4. A 16-point framework for effective assessment design that ensures alignment between objectives, teaching, and assessment. The framework recognizes the multiple roles assessment plays in the learning process.
This document discusses effective assessment practices and presents a framework for designing effective assessment. It covers 4 topics:
1. Categorizing effective assessment practices such as anecdotal, systematic, and formal assessments.
2. Core principles of effective assessment including enhancing learning, clear expectations, authentic tasks, and choice.
3. Repositioning the role of assessment so it guides students' approaches rather than being an afterthought.
4. A 16-point framework for effective assessment design that ensures alignment between objectives, teaching, and assessment. The framework recognizes the multiple roles assessment plays in the learning process.
NED University of Engineering & Technology, Karachi 3rd to 15th December, 2007 The Idea Behind this Discussion Assessment practices have traditionally been considered a routine activity. Typically, the composition and structuring of the assessment handouts/papers involve little creative effort. This event attempts to bring on board all faculty members of IMD to share their views on this issue. Presentation Outline
This discussion involves the
following major topics: 1. Categorizing Effective Assessment Practices 2. Core Principles of Effective Assessment 3. Repositioning the Role of Assessment 4. A Framework for Designing Effective Assessment Practices 5. The Learning Experience via Internet Topic 1
Categorizing Effective Assessment
Practices The Definition of Assessment Assessment is the process of identifying, gathering, and interpreting information about students’ learning. The central purpose of assessment is to provide information on student achievement and progress and set the direction for ongoing teaching and learning. Anecdotal Opportunities to Collect Evidence of Learning
Purpose To encourage students to experience
success, and to make immediate design modifications, if necessary. Documentation Typically, planned in the head and & Recording delivered verbally; does not result in a recorded assessment judgment. Timing & Typically, on a needs’ basis many Frequency times with a number of students.
Teacher’s Role Monitor progress and provide
feedback if warranted by students. Systematic Opportunities to Collect Evidence of Learning Purpose To provide meaningful feedback to all students as to what they need to do to improve.
Documentation Is specified in the unit of course plan but
& Recording does not necessarily involve written student handouts. May result in a recorded assessment judgment. Timing & At regular monitoring points across the Frequency term. Teacher’s Role Identifies a variety of opportunities to systematically judge students’ achievements of outcomes. Expectations about behavior and performance have been clearly stated to the students. Formal Assessment Tasks Used for Reporting Purposes Purpose To collect valid and reliable evidence that can be used to report about students’ levels of achievement of the outcomes, at key points. Documentation Is thoroughly documented and provided in & Recording advance to students. Includes focus on outcomes for assessment, and assessment criteria. Timing & Less frequently and are informed by the Frequency institution’s assessment and reporting policy. Teacher’s Role Teacher must systematically plan a small number of different tasks across the course that samples achievement of the outcomes. NED University’s Learning and Assessment System Structure
The Course Plan is distributed
across the term as follows: Minimum of 54 classroom lectures. Minimum of 27 practical sessions. 6-week summer internship in the Third Year. Final-Year project. NED University’s Learning and Assessment System Structure cont...
The Assessment System is structured
around both theory and practical content as follows: Theory Assessment
Final Exams (80 marks) Sessional Awards (20 marks)
expectations, establishes a reasonable workload, and provides opportunities for students to self- monitor, rehearse, practice, and receive feedback. Assessment is an integral component of a coherent educational experience. Three Objectives for Higher Education Assessment
1. Assessment that guides and
encourages effective approaches to learning. 2. Assessment that validly and reliably measures expected learning outcomes. 3. Assessment and grading that defines and protects academic standards. What Students Value in Assessment
In relation to achieving assessment
goals and objectives, students emphasize three aspects particularly. Unambiguous Expectations Authentic Tasks Choice and Flexibility What Students Value in Assessment – Unambiguous Expectations
Students value, and expect transparency
in the way their knowledge will be assessed; they wish to see a clear relationship between lectures tutorials, practical classes and subject resources, and what they are expected to demonstrate they know they can do. They also expect timely feedback that: 1. Explains the grades they have received 2. Rewards their achievement; and 3. Offers suggestions for improvements. What Students Value in Assessment – Authentic Tasks
Students value assessment tasks they
perceive to be ‘real’: assessment tasks that present challenges to be taken seriously, not only for the grades at stake, but also for the nature of the knowledge and skills they are expected to demonstrate. Students are anxious to test themselves and to compare their performance against others. What Students Value in Assessment – Choice and Flexibility Many students can express a strong preference for choices in the nature, weighting, and timing of assessment tasks. Providing higher education students with options in assessment – in a carefully structured way – is worth considering in many higher education courses though it is not a common practice. Encouraging students to engage with the curriculum expectations in this way should assist them in becoming more autonomous and independent learners. Topic 3
Repositioning the Role of Assessment
Perceptual Gaps in the Traditional Assessment Practices
Capturing the full educational benefits of
well-designed assessment requires many of the conventional assumptions about assessment in higher education to be reconsidered. To appreciate this, one needs to have an idea about: How academic staff view teaching and learning? How students view teaching and learning? The Academic Staff’s Perspective What course content should be taught? What should students learn?
What teaching and learning methods
are appropriate?
How can student learning be assessed?
Assessment can be the final consideration for staff in
the design of the teaching and learning process. The Academic Staff’s Perspective cont.
A carefully designed course that
focuses on the theory/design interface. Typically involving a substantial amount of practical work. Typically focusing on analytical and problem-solving skills. The Students’ Perspective In what ways am I going to be assessed? What do I need to know?
What then are the learning
objectives? What approaches to study should I adopt?
Assessment is usually at the forefront of students’
perception of the teaching and learning process. Re-positioning Student Assessment Academic Staff Students
What course content In what ways am I
should be taught? going to be assessed? What should students What do I need to learn? know?
What teaching and Repositioning What then are the learning
learning methods are student objectives? appropriate? assessment What approaches to study as a strategic tool should I adopt?
How can student
learning be assessed? The Assessment Design Challenge
Designing assessment to influence students’
patterns of study in positive ways can present significant challenges. The overall cycle of student assessment (from the design and declaration of assessment tasks, to the evaluation and reporting of student achievement) must not only guide student approaches to study and provide feedback, but also must determine their readiness for the next level, judge their fitness to practice, and ultimately protect and guarantee academic standards. Topic 4
A Framework for Designing Effective
Assessment Practices 16 Indicators of Effective Assessment 1. Assessment is treated by staff and students as an integral component of the entire teaching and learning process. 2. The multiple roles of assessment are recognized. 3. There is a faculty/departmental policy that guides individuals’ assessment practices. 4. There is a clear alignment between expected learning outcomes, what is taught and learnt, and the knowledge and skills assessed. 5. Assessment tasks assess the capacity to analyze and synthesize new information and concepts rather than simply recall information previously presented. 16 Indicators of Effective Assessment cont... 6. A variety of assessment methods is employed so that the limitations of particular methods are minimized. 7. Assessment tasks are designed to assess relevant generic skills as well as subject-specific knowledge and skills. 8. There is a steady progression in the complexity and demands of assessment requirements in the later years of course. 9. There is a provision of student choice in assessment tasks and weighting at certain times. 10. Student and staff workloads are considered in the scheduling and design of assessment tasks. 16 Indicators of Effective Assessment cont... 11. Excessive assessment is avoided. Assessment tasks are designed to sample student learning. 12. Assessment tasks are weighted to balance the formative and summative roles. Early low-stakes, low-weight assessment is used to provide students with feedback. 13. Grades are calculated and reported on the basis of clearly articulated learning outcomes and criteria for levels of achievement. 14. Students receive explanatory and diagnostic feedback as well as grades. 15. Assessment tasks are checked to ensure there are no inherent biases that may disadvantage particular student groups. 16. Plagiarism is minimized through careful task design, explicit education and appropriate monitoring of academic honesty. The Learning Experience via Internet
As primary beneficiaries of rapid advances
in IT, students today have easier and quicker access to more information than any previous generation of students. However, having access to such an abundance of information has just as often led to information overload. The question, then, arises whether their ability to acquire knowledge is matched by their ability to use it?