Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Language Assessment Scenario
Language Assessment Scenario
Assessment
Hello!
We are group 6
Mai Lan,
Bao Trinh &
Vy Nguyen
2
1
In our
presentation…
1. Scenario Overview
● Assessment goals: Assessing students’ achievement of the
contents they have been taught in 3 units (Grade 11; MOET’s
new textbook)
● Assessing contents: Vocabulary & Grammar
● Assessing conditions:
○ Time: 30 minutes
○ Students’ age: grade 11; 17 years old
○ Students’ level: B1 of the CEFR
4
2a.
Assessment
Purposes
“The assessment serves the
summative purpose in order to
evaluate students’ achievement on
grammar & vocabulary, assign
grades & provide feedback after
learning 3 units”
● Formative and Summative assessment purpose
Formative assessment
Summative assessment Main purpose
● Teaching and learning purposes
Diagnostic assessment
Assigning grades
Progress
Selection
Placement
Providing feedbacks
● System improvement purposes
Reflectives for teaching and learning
Assigning
grades
Progress Diagnostic
assessment
Teaching and
Learning
purposes
Selection Placement
Providing
feedbacks
Assigning Providing
Progress
grades feedbacks
11
System improvement
purposes
MCQs
Assessing
vocabulary
Constructed
Gap-fill
Response
18
Assessing Vocabulary: Cloze
Students match the word in one column with the part of sentence in the other to
complete the sentence (there are more words than needed → distractors)
20
Assessing Vocabulary: Gap Fill
Ss fill in the blank with a word that they’ve learnt
E.g: There are two types of family: nuclear family and ________ family. → extended
Assessing Gap-fill
vocabulary Constructed
Response
Combining
Sentences
23
Assessing Grammar :
Matching
Students select items in 1 list that match the ones in the other.
28
3b.
Selected
Assessment
Methods
“ Assessing Grammar
• MCQs
• Matching
Assessing Vocabulary
• Cloze
• Gap-fill
• Gap-fill
• Combining
Sentences
30
Assessing grammar
with MCQs Justification
31
Assessing grammar
with Matching task
Assessment target served Justification
Recognize structure of cleft The matching task (match 2 sentence parts starting
sentences (It is/was...that…). with it is/ it was… & that…) perfectly matches the
assessment target
32
Assessing grammar
with Combining sentences task
33
Assessing grammar & vocabulary
with Gap-filling task
Assessment target served Justification
Grammar: Recall verbs of “the user input is word plus word sense. Much of their
perception (seem, be) and use effort is spent on dis-ambiguating the key in potential
them correctly in context. carrier sentences in order to find a carrier sentence in
Vocabulary: Recall the meaning which the key is used in the intended sense.” (Smith et
of vocabulary items from Unit 1, al., 2010)
2 & 3 (topic Generation gap,
Relationships & Being Suitable to help Ss recall some verbs of perception
independent) and use them and topic-related vocabulary with intended meaning
correctly in context. indicated by the suggested part of sentence.
34
Assessing vocabulary
with cloze task
Assessment target served Justification
Vocabulary: Recall the meaning
of vocabulary items from Unit 1, “Allows more items to be tested within the same
2 & 3 (topic Generation gap, amount of time” (Ur et al., 2018)
Relationships & Being
independent) and use them
correctly in context. “Reduce the amount of work designing distractors
compared to MCQs” (Ur et al., 2018)
35
4.
Test
Specification
References
● Paxton, M. (2000). A Linguistic Perspective on Multiple Choice Questioning.
Assessment & Evaluation In Higher Education, 25(2), 109-119. doi:
10.1080/713611429
● Smith, S., Avinesh, P. V. S., & Kilgarriff, A. (2010). Gap-fill tests for language
learners: Corpus-driven item generation. In Proceedings of ICON-2010: 8th
International Conference on Natural Language Processing (pp. 1-6). Macmillan
Publishers.
● Ur, P., Haim, O., Kluska, M., Plavin, S., Shlayer, J., Steiner, J. & Timna, L. (2018). A
practical guide for teaching vocabulary. State of Israel
● Bloom, B.S. (Ed.). Engelhart, M.D., Furst, E.J., Hill, W.H., Krathwohl, D.R.
(1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook I: The Cognitive
Domain. New York: David McKay Co Inc.
37