Introduction To Politics: Lectures Session 7 Multilevel Politics: Subnational Politics and Transnational Regionalism

You might also like

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 17

INTRODUCTION TO

POLITICS
LECTURES
SESSION 7
MULTILEVEL POLITICS: SUBNATIONAL POLITICS AND
TRANSNATIONAL REGIONALISM
INTRODUCTION

• THE POWER OF NATION STATES ARE EXTERNALLY UNIFIED BUT


INTERNALLY FRAGMENTED
• DIVISIONS EXIST BETWEEN CENTRAL GOVERNMENT AND LOCAL
GOVERNMENT
• DIVISIONS ARE SHAPED BY THE CONSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK OF A
PARTICULAR NATION (EITHER UNITARY OR FEDERAL)
• EACH DIVISION ESTABLISHES A PARTICULAR TERRITORIAL
DISTRIBUTION OF GOVERNMENT POWER
• THIS DETERMINES CENTRE-PERIPHERY RELATIONS AND
INTERACTIONS
CENTRALIZATION OR DECENTRALIZATION

• A KEY CHARACTERISTIC OF MODERN STATES IS THAT THEY ARE DIVIDED ON A


TERRITORIAL BASIS
• THIS DIVISION TAKES THE FORM OF CENTRE (NATIONAL) AND PERIPHERY
(REGIONAL, PROVINCIAL AND LOCAL) INSTITUTIONS
• CONSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORKS DETERMINE CENTRE-PERIPHERY RELATIONS IN
TERMS OF:
• THE DISTRIBUTION OF FUNCTIONS AND REPONSIBILITIES BETWEEN LEVELS OF
GOVERNMENT
• THE MEANS BY WHICH PERSONNEL ARE APPOINTED AND RECRUITED
• THE SCOPE AND POWER OF THE CENTRE AND THE EXTENT OF THE
INDEPENDENCE OF PERIPHERAL BODIES
• IN ALL THIS, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT PLAYS A CRUCIAL ROLE
THE IMPORTANCE OF A CENTRAL
GOVERNMENT

• KEY ACTOR IN WORLD STAGE (ENTERS INTO AND NEGOTIATE


ALLIANCES, TRADE AGREEMENTS)
• GAINING REPRESENTATION AT INTERNATIONAL SUMMITS AND
BECOMES MEMBER OF SUPRANATIONAL BODIES
• RESPONSIBLE FOR A STATES EXTERNAL RELATIONS BY ITS CONTROL
OF FOREIGN, DIPLOMATIC AND DEFENCE POLICY
• MEDIATES BETWEEN PERIPHERAL BODIES TO ENSURE COPERATION
• CONTROLS THE STATES ECONOMIC LIFE
CENTRALIZATION AND ITS ADVANTAGES

• IS ‘THE CONCENTRATION OF POLITICAL


POWER OR GOVERNMENT AUTHORITY AT
THE NATIONAL LEVEL’ (HEYWOOD, 2007)
• ENGENDERS NATIONAL UNITY
• FACILITATES UNIFORMITY
• ENHANCES EQUALITY
• SPURS PROSPERITY
LIMITS TO CENTRALIZATION: THE CASE FOR
DECENTRALIZATION

• NATURE OF MODERN STATES LIMITS THE EXTENT OF


CENTRALIZATION
• POSES CHALLENGES FOR BUREAUCRATIC EFFICIENCY AND CAN LEAD
TO ‘DISECONOMIES OF SCALE’
• HENCE THE NEED TO VEST DOMESTIC RESPONSIBILITIES WITH
PERIPHERAL INSTITUTIONS
• DECENTARLIZATION INVOLVES THE TRANSFER OF RESPONSIBILITIES
AND DECISION-MAKING POWER FROM CENTRAL TO PERIPHERAL
BODIES
• THIS, HOWEVER, HAS ADVANTAGES FOR EFFECTIVE GOVERNANCE
DECENTRALIZATION AND ITS ADVANTAGES

• IS THE ‘EXPANSION OF LOCAL AUTONOMY THROUGH THE


TRANSFER OF POWERS AND RESPONSIBILITIES AWAY FROM
NATIONAL BODIES’ (HEYWOOD, 2007: 165)
• ENCOURAGES PARTICIPATION
• ENSURES RESPONSIVENESS
• STRENGTHENS DEMOCRATIC ACCOUNTABILITY
• GUARANTEES LEGITIMACY
• PROTECTS LIBERTY
CENTRE-PERIPHERY RELATIONS

• HISTORI-CULTURAL, GEOGRAPHICAL AND POLITICO-ECONOMIC FACTORS SHAPE THE BALANCE


BETWEEN CENTRALIZATION AND DECENTRALIZATION
• MOST PROMINENT AMONG THIS IS THE CONSTITUTIONAL STRUCTURE OF THE STATE AND
LOCATION OF SOVEREIGNTY
• CONSTITUTIONLA STRUCTURE PROVIDES THE FRAMEWORK WITHIN WHICH CENTRE-PERIPHERY
RELATIONS ARE CONDUCTED
• FEDERAL AND UNITARY SYSTEMS ARE TWO OF THE MOST COMMON FORMS OF TERRITORIAL
ORGANIZATIONS IN THE MODERN WORLD
• A THIRD, BUT MOSTLY UNSUSTAINABLE FORM, IS CONFEDERATION
• THESE ARE ‘QUALIFIED UNION OF STATES IN WHICH EACH STATE RETAINS ITS INDEPENDENCE,
TYPICALLY GUARANTEED BY UNANIMOUS DECISION MAKING’ (HEYWOOD, 2007: 165).
• CAN, IN THE ABSENCE OF EFFECTIVE CENTRAL BODY, METAMORPHOSE INTO FEDERAL SYSTEMS
OR DISINTEGRATE ALTOGETHER
FEDERAL SYSTEMS

• REFERS TO THE LEGAL AND POLITICAL STRUCTURES THAT DISTRIBUTE


POWER TERRITORIALLY WITHIN A STATE
• LIES BETWEEN A UNITARY STATE AND A CONFEDERATION
• HOWEVER, MORE COMMON THAN CONFEDERAL SYSTEMS
• EXAMPLES INCLUDE USA, BRAZIL, NIGERIA, PAKISTAN, SWITZERLAND ETC
• CENTRAL FEATURE IS SOVEREIGNTY IS SHARED BETWEEN CENTER AND
PERIPHERY
• ENSURES THAT NEITHER CAN ENCROACH ON THE POWERS OF THE OTHER
• BASED UPON A COMPROMISE BETWEEN UNITY AND REGIONAL DIVERSITY
AND BETWEEN THE NEED FOR EFFECTIVE CONTROL AND THE NEEDS FOR
CHECKS ON POWER
WHY FEDERALISM?

• CERTAIN COMMON FEATURES CAN BE FOUND IN FEDERAL STATES


• THIS SUGGESTS THAT FEDERAL PRINCIPLE IS MORE APPLICABLE TO
CERTAIN STATES THAN OTHERS
• HOWEVER, FEDERAL SYSTEMS COME ABOUT AS A RESULT OF THE
FOLLOWING FACTORS:
• THE DESIRE FOR ESTABLISHED POLITICAL COMMUNITIES TO FORM A
POLITICAL ORGANIZATION YET MAINTAINING THEIR AUTONOMY
• THE EXISTENCE OF AN EXTERNAL THREAT OR A DESIRE TO PLAY A MORE
EFFECTIVE ROLE IN INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS
• GEOGRAPHICAL SIZE
• CULTURAL AND ETHNIC HETEROGENEITY
FEATURES OF FEDERALISM

• EACH FEDERAL SYSTEM IS UNIQUE


• HOWEVER, THEY ALL SHARE CERTAIN COMMON
FEATURES:
• TWO RELATIVELY AUTONOMOUS LEVELS OF
GOVERNMENT
• WRITTEN CONSTITUTION
• CONSTITUTIONAL ARBITER
• LINKING INSTITUTIONS
UNITARY SYSTEMS

• THE MOST COMMON FORM OF GOVERNMENT IN THE CONTEMPORARY


WORLD
• SOVEREIGN POWER IS VESTED IN A SINGLE, NATIONAL INSTITUTION
• CENTRAL GOVERNMENT DECIDES HOW POWER IS SHARED AND DISPERSED
• TWO DISTINCT INSTITUTIONAL FORMS OF PERIPHERAL AUTHORITY EXIST
IN UNITARY STATES
• LOCAL GOVERNMENT (SPECIFIC TO A PARTICULAR LOCALITY)
• DEVOLUTION (THE PASSING DOWN OF POWERS FROM HIGHER
AUTHORITY).
LOCAL GOVERNMENT

• GOVERNMENT SPECIFIC TO A PARTICULAR LOCALITY


• HAS NO SHARE IN SOVEREIGNTY
• ARE POLITICALLY RELEVANT, ADMINISTRATIVELY
NECESSARY AND INTELLIGIBLE
• ITS PRESERVATION RELIES ON POWERS GIVEN FROM
THE CENTRE
• HOW MANY LOCAL GOVERNMENT UNITS ARE IN THE
GAMBIA? 8? Banjul, Basse, Brikama, Janjanbureh,
Kanifing, Kerewan, Kuntaur AND Mansakonko
DEVOLUTION

• THE STATUTORY GRANTING OF POWERS FROM THE CENTRAL


GOVERNMENT OF A SOVEREIGN STATE TO GOVERNMENT AT A SUBNATIONAL
LEVEL
• CREATED IN RESPONSE TO INCREASING CENTRIFUGAL TENSIONS WITHIN A
STATE
• DIFFERS FROM FEDERALISM AS POWERS ARE TEMPORARY AND RESIDE WITH
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
• DEVOLVED ASSEMBLIES CAN BE REPEALED BY CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
• YET THEY ARE HARD TO WEAKEN AND ABOLISH
• THOUGH THEY HELP ABATE CENTRIFUGAL PRESSURES, THEY CAN LEAD TO
STATE BREAK-UP.
TRANSNATIONAL REGIONALISM

• REGIONALISM IN GENERAL TERMS IS THE PROCESS THROUGH WHICH


GEOGRAPHICAL REGIONS BECOME SIGNIFICANT POLITICAL AND/OR
ECONOMIC UNITS
• TWO FACES CHARACTERISE REGIONALISM:
• SUBNATIONAL- PROCESS OF DECENTRALISATION THAT TAKES PLACE
WITHIN COUNTRIES
• TRANSNATIONAL- PROCESS OF COOPERATION OR INTEGRATION BETWEEN
COUNTRIES OF THE SAME REGION
• AN ONGOING PROBLEM WITH REGIONALISM IS LINKED TO THE CHALLENGE
OF ESTABLSIHING THE NATURE AND EXTENT OF A REGION
• THUS, WHAT IS A REGION: A GEOGRAPHICAL AREA? A SOCIO-CULTURAL
ENTITY?
TYPES OF REGIONALISM

• SECURITY REGIONALSIM
• POLITICAL REGIONALISM
• ECONOMIC REGIONALISM
TEST: ANSWER ONLY ONE QUESTION(NOT
MORE THAN ONE PAGE!!!!)

1. POLITICS IS CONSIDERED AS A PARTICULAR MEANS OF RESOLVING


CONFLICT THROUGH COMPROMISE, CONCILLIATION AND NEGOTIATION.
USING THIS DEFINTION OF POLITICS, CRITICALLY DISCUSS AND PROPOSE
A SOLUTION TO THE CURRENT ETHNO-POLITICAL TENSIONS IN THE
GAMBIA.
2. AT THE HEART OF SOCIAL DEMOCRACY IS A COMPROMISE BETWEEN, ON
ONE HAND, AN ACCEPTANCE OF CAPITALISM AS THE ONLY RELIABLE
MECHANISM FOR WEALTH GENERATION AND, ON THE OTHER, A DESIRE
TO REDISTRIBUTE THIS WEALTH IN ACCORDANCE WITH MORAL RATHER
THAN MARKET PRINCIPLES. IN LIGHT OF THE ABOVE, DISCUSS

You might also like