This document summarizes a case between Alicanto and Ravisia concerning Ravisia's military intervention in Alicanto. It provides background facts on the countries and events leading up to the intervention. Ravisia intervened after the Security Council refused to authorize intervention. Ravisia claims its presence is justified to protect Alicanto's people, while Alicanto argues it is an illegal occupation. Both countries request the Court make rulings on the legality of Ravisia's conduct and the status of a fugitive held by Ravisia.
This document summarizes a case between Alicanto and Ravisia concerning Ravisia's military intervention in Alicanto. It provides background facts on the countries and events leading up to the intervention. Ravisia intervened after the Security Council refused to authorize intervention. Ravisia claims its presence is justified to protect Alicanto's people, while Alicanto argues it is an illegal occupation. Both countries request the Court make rulings on the legality of Ravisia's conduct and the status of a fugitive held by Ravisia.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
This document summarizes a case between Alicanto and Ravisia concerning Ravisia's military intervention in Alicanto. It provides background facts on the countries and events leading up to the intervention. Ravisia intervened after the Security Council refused to authorize intervention. Ravisia claims its presence is justified to protect Alicanto's people, while Alicanto argues it is an illegal occupation. Both countries request the Court make rulings on the legality of Ravisia's conduct and the status of a fugitive held by Ravisia.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
FACTS: ALICANTO FACTS: NEW BENNU FACTS: Change of Alicanto’s Government FACTS: New Bennu and the New Parliament FACTS: SC INTERVENTION (UNMORPH) FACTS: SC INTERVENTION (UNMORPH) FACTS: SC INTERVENTION (UNMORPH) FACTS: The Introduction of Talonnic Law FACTS: Talonnic Law Caused Violence FACTS: The Death of PM Simurg Facts: Ravisia’s Intervention Excerpt from the Speech of the Ravisian President: “With confidence that I am acting in the best traditions of our nation and in the best interests of all nations, I hereby declare to the world that if the Security Council will not authorize the international intervention that we are proposing, our beloved Ravisia will itself honor its responsibility to protect the good, valiant, and innocent people of Alicanto, to whom history has bound us. I will not shirk that duty: I cannot. I call on all of goodwill to join us in our mission, but we will complete it in any event. That is my solemn vow.” Facts: Defeat of Ravisia’s Propositions Bilateral Negotiations (Alicanto v. Ravisia) Bilateral Negotiations (Alicanto v. Ravisia) OPERATION PROVIDE SHELTER OPERATION PROVIDE SHELTER Arguments Alicanto Ravisia requests that the Court: requests that the Court: 1. declare that the occupation of Alicantan 1. declare that the presence of the territory by Ravisian armed forces since 1 Ravisian military forces in Alicanto August 2008 has been and continues to be has been and continues to be fully a violation of international law, and order justified under international law Ravisia to remove its military personnel 2. decline to call upon Ravisia to from Alicanto at once; produce its classified intelligence 2. to produce the intelligence that was 3. find that Ravisia’s conduct at Camp delivered to the Secretary-General Tara at all times has been entirely 3. determine that the conduct of Ravisian lawful soldiers at Camp Tara, including the 4. hold that the Alicantan citizen broadcasting of offensive radio Piccardo Donati need not be programming and the sexual exploitation repatriated to Alicanto, where he of Alicantan children, are violations of will be subjected to judicial international law execution in violation of 4. order Ravisia immediately to deliver to international law. Alicanto the fugitive Piccardo Donati “Talonnic Law for our Times.” Two of its chapters, “On Women’s Rights” and “On the Death Penalty,” immediately drew criticism from international human rights organizations, including ILSA. The chapter “On Women’s Rights” provided that local registries would not record ownership of real property or businesses in the names of women, unless they occupied their residences or operated their businesses.
The History of the Abolition of African Slave-Trade by the British Parliament: Account of the Rise, Progress, and Accomplishment of the Abolition of Slavery